[Closed] De-published article in The Guardian

well thats you on an NSA watch list countzero

guardian probably being too cavalier with the D notice issued when Snowden first started singing. They'd had a warning.

http://www.andmagazine.com/content/phoenix/13003.html

It warned British media not to publish information on "specific covert operations, sources and methods of the security services, SIS and GCHQ [the NSA's British counterpart], Defence Intelligence Units, Special Forces and those involved with them, the application of those methods, including the interception of communications and their targets; the same applies to those engaged on counter-terrorist operations."

They googled the bloke they got the info from and found out he's a world-class nutter - it wasn't Snowden.

They googled the bloke they got the info from and found out he's a world-class nutter - it wasn't Snowden.

<tinfoil hat>
Ahh, but inept churnalism of a story based on claims by a nutter is just what [b]They[/b] want you to believe
</tinfoil hat>

A little more on the story...

http://order-order.com/2013/06/30/observer-pulls-splash-after-source-turns-out-to-be-911-trutherread-pulled-story-in-full-here/

disappeared from the google cache now. Anyone know of a mirror?

I wonder how much of the news is governed by D notices? Tony Blair apparently has a rich history of D notices...

Strange how no mainstream sources have picked up on Russ Tice, who 1st blew the whistle on the NSA in 2005:

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-nsa-spied-on-barack-obama-2004-russ-tice-2013-6

also seems the 9/11 truth movement has some pretty compelling evidence:

http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130608-901635.html