Community

Forum menu
Daily Mail correcti...
 

[Closed] Daily Mail correction (with no link)

Posts: 251
Full Member
Topic starter
 

No idea what the substance of the original story was but there can't be much left of it after this;

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 10:28 am
Posts: 34474
Full Member
 

Im looking forward to the new royal charter and the press having to post a retraction of equal prominence to the original story

so headlines would now read have to read' Chris Jeffereies did not murder joanna yates and we are all arseholes!'


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 10:31 am
Posts: 23491
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 10:34 am
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

Why are they still going after Brown? such a hatefull rag.


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 10:40 am
Posts: 23491
Full Member
 

Im looking forward to the new royal charter and the press having to post a retraction of equal prominence to the original story

The thing is - as well as publish the minimum of correction what the daily mail does is it also deletes the original story - so while this correction now exists the story that it corrects has now vanished


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 10:55 am
Posts: 34474
Full Member
 

The media assassination of Brown was probably the most viscous and concerted attack on any politician I can think of!


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 10:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The thing is - as well as publish the minimum of correction what the daily mail does is it also deletes the original story - so while this correction now exists the story that it corrects has now vanished

isn't that a bit 'brave new world'? Funny* how alarmingly accurate both George Orwell and Aldous Huxley actually were.

*not in a good way


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 11:01 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
Topic starter
 

For balance sometimes newspapers report the important stuff;

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 11:07 am
Posts: 3524
Full Member
 

I liked this one from last week...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 11:17 am
Posts: 4097
Free Member
 

The media assassination of Brown was probably the most viscous and concerted attack on any politician I can think of!

tbf, he's done himself no favours continuing to draw his MP's salary while hardly ever attending parliament, and referring to himself last week as an "ex-politician".


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 11:23 am
Posts: 3729
Free Member
 

That may be true, however he has given up his ex-PM pension and gives all the money he makes from speaches etc to charity so it seems a bit harsh to attack him for keeping the MP salary bit.


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 11:31 am
Posts: 23491
Full Member
 

and referring to himself last week as an "ex-politician".

Most MPs aren't politicians - so he's correct in that respect. An MP's role to represent their constituency. A politician - someone who seeks to influence policy - is something else.


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 11:37 am
 igm
Posts: 11869
Full Member
 

Is anyone else starting to think Brown was a better bet than the self serving toads we have at the moment?

Go on Jamie, Photoshop someone, say Gove, Osbourne or the like, as a toad. Or is that just too easy?


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 12:12 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

Is anyone else starting to think Brown was a better bet than the self serving toads we have at the moment?

I'm with Russell Brand on this. He was a liar, serving multinationals, rather then the electorate who wore a different colour tie


 
Posted : 07/11/2013 12:20 pm