MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch
No idea what the substance of the original story was but there can't be much left of it after this;
[img] 
[/img]
Im looking forward to the new royal charter and the press having to post a retraction of equal prominence to the original story
so headlines would now read have to read' Chris Jeffereies did not murder joanna yates and we are all arseholes!'
[img] 
[/img]
Why are they still going after Brown? such a hatefull rag.
Im looking forward to the new royal charter and the press having to post a retraction of equal prominence to the original story
The thing is - as well as publish the minimum of correction what the daily mail does is it also deletes the original story - so while this correction now exists the story that it corrects has now vanished
The media assassination of Brown was probably the most viscous and concerted attack on any politician I can think of!
The thing is - as well as publish the minimum of correction what the daily mail does is it also deletes the original story - so while this correction now exists the story that it corrects has now vanished
isn't that a bit 'brave new world'? Funny* how alarmingly accurate both George Orwell and Aldous Huxley actually were.
*not in a good way
For balance sometimes newspapers report the important stuff;
[img] 
[/img]
I liked this one from last week...
[img] 
[/img]
The media assassination of Brown was probably the most viscous and concerted attack on any politician I can think of!
tbf, he's done himself no favours continuing to draw his MP's salary while hardly ever attending parliament, and referring to himself last week as an "ex-politician".
That may be true, however he has given up his ex-PM pension and gives all the money he makes from speaches etc to charity so it seems a bit harsh to attack him for keeping the MP salary bit.
and referring to himself last week as an "ex-politician".
Most MPs aren't politicians - so he's correct in that respect. An MP's role to represent their constituency. A politician - someone who seeks to influence policy - is something else.
Is anyone else starting to think Brown was a better bet than the self serving toads we have at the moment?
Go on Jamie, Photoshop someone, say Gove, Osbourne or the like, as a toad. Or is that just too easy?
Is anyone else starting to think Brown was a better bet than the self serving toads we have at the moment?
I'm with Russell Brand on this. He was a liar, serving multinationals, rather then the electorate who wore a different colour tie