Forum search & shortcuts

bird-slicing eco-cr...
 

[Closed] bird-slicing eco-crucifixes

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#5286982]

gosh, that pillock Delingpole finally got something right:

[url= http://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/top-stories/birdwatchers-see-rare-bird-killed-by-wind-turbine-1-2980240 ]they're even rarer now...[/url]


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:00 pm
Posts: 33983
Full Member
 

The turbine lobby would have us believe there's no evidence that turbines are a threat to wildlife, birds in particular.
Well, there is now. A shame such a beautiful creature flies all this way, and its a human construct that causes its death.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm sure it would have otherwise flown into a window or been killed by a domestic cat, like the hundreds of thousands of birds that meet that fate each year.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:12 pm
Posts: 43964
Full Member
 

The most recent figures are from the Mammal Society, which estimates that [b]the UK's cats catch up to 275 million prey items a year, of which 55 million are birds.[/b] This is the number of prey items that were known to have been caught; we don't know how many more the cats caught, but didn't bring home, or how many escaped but subsequently died.

The most frequently caught birds, according to the Mammal Society, are probably (in order) house sparrows, blue tits, blackbirds and starlings.

No evidence
Despite the large numbers of birds killed, there is no scientific evidence that predation by cats in gardens is having any impact on bird populations UK-wide. [b]This may be surprising, but many millions of birds die naturally every year[/b], mainly through starvation, disease, or other forms of predation.


http://www.rspb.org.uk/advice/gardening/unwantedvisitors/cats/birddeclines.aspx


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So? Do they taste good?


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes. What we must do is continue to use non-renewable sources of energy so a few birds don't die.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

probably a bit like pigeon...

(is my guess)


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:23 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Evolution. Only birds that don't fly into things will survive


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:27 pm
Posts: 16221
Free Member
 

Gosh, I'd better cover up my French doors, seeing as one of the few garden birds not eaten by a cat managed to fly into it.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:28 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Surely the best thing would be to nail a cat to the top of each turbine? Bird have evolved to keep away from cats as a natural preditor, by putting a cat on each turbine, the birds would automatically associate a turbine with Danger...............


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:30 pm
Posts: 13
Free Member
 

That rare bird was already thousands of miles off course. It didn't exactly have a track record for paying attention did it?


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:32 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

It was seen by birders fly straight into the turbine. It is ironic that after waiting so long for this bird to turn up in the UK it was killed by a wind turbine and not a natural predator,

Cars drive into trees and the drivers get killed so it obviously the fault of the tree


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

it's the spinning blades that are the problem, you'd need a cat nailed to the end of each blade.

(make sure each cat is wearing a bell - to be sure)


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:33 pm
Posts: 43964
Full Member
 

[quote=slugwash ]That rare bird was already thousands of miles off course. It didn't exactly have a track record for paying attention did it?
😆


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:33 pm
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

they're even rarer now...
except, they aren't rare at all, are they? They are in the lowest tier of threat level. It's rare [i]to see them in this country[/i] but that's not the same thing at all.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:34 pm
Posts: 3273
Free Member
 

The White-throated Needletail - the world’s fastest flying bird - was thousand of miles off course

Not a good start...

after over 80 twitches flocked to Harris - with scores more on their way

So it can have a peaceful rest and get back on its way...

others were coming from all over the country

Well, not that peaceful

It is ironic that after waiting so long for this bird to turn up in the UK it was killed by a wind turbine and not a natural predator

So it probably wouldn't have made it out anyway

Some people will have lost the cost of their flights

The crux of the problem.

So basically it was a lost, possibly sick bird that didnt stand much of a chance, and having been chased into a turbine by the twitchers, they take their grievance out on the fact that the turbine was there 🙄


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 10966
Full Member
 

maxtorque - if the cats were nailed on so they were upside down on the downstroke then you could also harvest the energy from them trying to spin round to land on their feet.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

That rare bird was already thousands of miles off course. It didn't exactly have a track record for paying attention did it?

Thank you sir ,a perfect Friday LOL


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:37 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
 

Some ace comments there. Lunch all over the keyboard. 🙂


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:41 pm
Posts: 2432
Free Member
 

it's the spinning blades that are the problem, you'd need a cat nailed to the end of each blade.

(make sure each cat is wearing a bell - to be sure)

- if the cats were nailed on so they were upside down on the downstroke then you could also harvest the energy from them trying to spin round to land on their feet.

Perpetual motion may no longer be a myth!
I don't think that bells would be neccessary, a nauseated spinning cat would probably be an audible enough warning for even the most ****-witted of birds.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:49 pm
Posts: 3685
Free Member
 

The White-throated Needletail - the world’s fastest flying bird - was thousand of miles off course

I thought the Peregrine Falcon was fastest, able to do the Kessel Run in under 12 parsecs.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:50 pm
Posts: 3544
Full Member
 

if the cats were nailed on so they were upside down on the downstroke then you could also harvest the energy from them trying to spin round to land on their feet.

Brilliant.

Perhaps alternating upside down cats and buttered toast on the blades...


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Loving the thread title. That's one to be proud of.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I get about 5 birds a week fly into my 2mx3m large living room window FWIW. only ever had to go out out and physically pickup a baby pigeon once in the 2.5 yrs I've been here and that seemed stunned for longer than 20 minutes coz I was worried a cat would come by (as they do quite reguarly).

Article said that bird is a fast bird ... anything flying into a blade/pylon, esp at 30-40 mph or more isn't going to survive. Figures prob not out there but I'd be interested to see how many birds mown down on roads by cars or in the air by aircraft as % vs green energy generation!!


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 12:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And of course, no birds have ever died due to pollution from fossil fuels, oil spills etc....no bird habitats have ever been displaced in order to mine for coal/drill for gas.... 🙄


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:02 pm
Posts: 7368
Free Member
 

baby pigeon

Are you sure? [i]Really[/i] sure?


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:02 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

So, it's a "fast flying bird" How come it manged to hit one of the blades? The "turbine disc" isn't solid, in fact, it's much much more air than blade. Only by flying slowly was the lazy bird likely to get hit.............


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:06 pm
Posts: 3685
Free Member
 

So, it's a "fast flying bird" How come it manged to hit one of the blades?

It was distracted by a crowd of binocular-fetishists.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

littlemisspanda - Member
And of course, no birds have ever died due to pollution

They do but it's not as instant as hitting a turbine and no-one wants to sit around watching things eat garbage and then slowly die.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:10 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Just one? pff, oil is much better at killing http://dailydeadbirds.com/


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:11 pm
Posts: 10966
Full Member
 

It was distracted by a crowd of binocular-fetishists.

Or deafened by the sound of miaowing and ringing bells and blinded by hot butter dripping into its eyes.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
 

it is ironic that after waiting so long for this bird to turn up in the UK it was killed by a wind turbine and not a natural predator

Surely it is coincidence, not irony? 😕


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:13 pm
Posts: 14293
Free Member
 

It is said to be the fastest-flying bird in flapping flight, with a confirmed maximum of 111.6 km/h (69.3 mph).It is commonly reputed to reach velocities of up to 170 km/h (105 mph), though this has not been verified.

And it couldn't avoid a turbine blade? Darwin.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Coyote - Member
baby pigeon
Are you sure? Really sure?

Not really .. something like that though!

EDIT: i.e. something young and pigeon/dove-esque


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fastest flying bird is actually an Eider Duck. Strange but true. Fastest dropping bird is a Peregrine. Might just apply to UK birds.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:24 pm
Posts: 7368
Free Member
 

"World's fastest bird" or not it should never be flying beyond it's limits to brake safely and under control. Bird is wholly at fault.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:24 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I wonder if any of those birdwatchers hit anything in their car as they flocked to Harris?

Birds die when they crash into all sorts of things. Numbers are the issue. So far we have ONE confirmed kill don't we?


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

it's a bit more than one...

[img] [/img]
(photo from spain)

[img] [/img]
(photo from Denmark)

[img] [/img]
(photo from Brighton)


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surely the best thing would be to nail a cat to the top of each turbine

If it could not see the turbine baring in mind the size of the buggers its got no chance seeing a cat on it.

"Worlds fastest flapping bird,with worlds worst eyesight"

Tis a shame still.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:42 pm
Posts: 7368
Free Member
 

Not wanting to be skeptical but the turbine would have to have exceptionally sharp blades and be rotating at a fair old pace to slice the head clean off a seagull.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:44 pm
Posts: 2432
Free Member
 

Not that they don't deserve it, Cougar! 😉


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:46 pm
Posts: 10966
Full Member
 

awhiles - so what would be an acceptable level of avian mortality to generate energy using less environmentally damaging/more sustainable means than fossil fuel?


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:47 pm
Posts: 3685
Free Member
 

You know how James Dyson 'revolutionised' office fan design with that deformed albino hula-hoop thing, could the design not be reversed to make a bladeless wind turbine?


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:49 pm
Posts: 3685
Free Member
 

Or we could simply burn seagulls to fuel power stations, they're oily enough. Imagine the smell.


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:52 pm
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

Planning regulations stipulate that blades of wind turbines must;

be able to maintain sufficient sharpness so that when bird strikes occur... the dispatch of avians would be be considered humane and prevent uneccessary suffering or distress

-UK planning portal


 
Posted : 28/06/2013 1:53 pm
Page 1 / 2