Australia to lose a...
 

[Closed] Australia to lose a game of cricket??

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looks that way - all the rubbish forgotten if England manage a win.

Back to being World beaters!


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 11:34 am
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Listening on the radio. It's not proper cricket though is it.


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 11:36 am
Posts: 24778
Free Member
 

we're making tough work of it........


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:01 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

I ain't heard no fat lady....


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:02 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Oh dear god....


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:04 pm
Posts: 24778
Free Member
 

12 to win, last over, 8 off first two balls. Hmmm.....


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FFS etc


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:06 pm
Posts: 163
Free Member
 

I think someone spoke too bloody soon!


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:06 pm
Posts: 1144
Full Member
 

Gutting.
RM.


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:06 pm
Posts: 24778
Free Member
 

right now if they fell into a barrel of tits, they'd come out sucking their thumbs.


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 12:11 pm
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

Bad tactics in the last 2 overs. Stokes bowls 2 yorkers both dot balls. Bangs it in, goes for 6. No more Yorkers, ball whistles to boundary repeatedly.


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But it's ok, it was all KP's fault, right?


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 5:57 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

You must be the only person getting a harder time right now than him
must be tough being in oz right now

Diabolical


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 5:59 pm
Posts: 283
Free Member
 

We would have won if not for the dodgy 6 that turned into a 2. The guy was yards outside the rope but jumped in the air and palmed it back onto the pitch. Seems some confusion on the rules..


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 7:44 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50558
 

I was going edit the title to put spoiler in but I'll leave it as a nice surprise.


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 7:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The guy was yards outside the rope but jumped in the air and palmed it back onto the pitch. Seems some confusion on the rules..

No confusion whatsoever. If the fielder is not touching the rope or the ground beyond the boundary when he handles the ball, it's not a boundary until such a time as he does.

We'd have won if Cook had focussed on the matter in hand to take the last few wickets quickly, rather than thinking "that's a high enough score", and letting them get back in. Captain clueless strikes again.


 
Posted : 17/01/2014 11:38 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

[pedant]

We would have won if not for the dodgy 6 that turned into a 2.

It's actually the other way round - given as two runs during the innings, changed to a 6 in the interval. Because the last point of contact the fielder had with the ground before he touched the ball was outside the field of play, he's classed as being over the boundary. If he'd jumped from inside the pitch, pushed the ball back over and landed over the rope, that wouldn't've been a boundary

[/pedant]


 
Posted : 18/01/2014 10:49 am
Posts: 17263
Full Member
 

Let's not forget our proper cricket team.
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 18/01/2014 11:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That was a properly ace game of cricket to watch last night! Honestly gave us no chance once Johnson got out leaving just Faulkner and Mckay, just one mistake and it was all over, but those two (primarily Faulkner of course) just did an amazing job, was brilliant to watch (maybe not so much for Mr Cook and co ha ha ๐Ÿ˜ˆ ).


 
Posted : 18/01/2014 12:15 pm