Forum search & shortcuts

Are some people too...
 

[Closed] Are some people too 'anti' for their own good?

Posts: 57422
Full Member
 

Very restrained there Flashy! My salmon was lovely BTW 😀


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 8:32 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Salmon? Do they do a McSalmon now? 😉

Or is it a Fillet-o-Salmon?


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 8:36 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

A burger with fries once in a while is nowhere near as bad as sticky sugary sweet things ingested pretty much every day.

Yes, which is why I was criticising the junk food industry in general, not just McDonalds. Yes kids have long eaten sweets and drunk sugary drinks, just not in the industrial quantities they do now - with a strange correlation between that and obesity, and the massive increase in advertising spend on promoting such 'foods'.

But of course there's no connection.


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 8:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This thread seems to have moved on a bit from its original question - but here's my tuppence worth anyway.

Yes, a lot of people are too 'anti' for their own good.

Nobody bothered with the place before, nobody bothered with it when it was empty and becoming derilict - how can anyone be 'anti' in this specific case?

There are instances where I can understand being 'anti' because of the hyper-aggressive tactics of some chains. For example, Starbuck used to have a policy (according to Naomi Klein) of setting up branches that deliberately cannibalised the sales of their own pre-existing branches as that would 'prove' that they had taken as much of the market as possible in that area and most likely killed off all competition. I doubt this would go down too well with shareholders in the current climate though.

This is erring towards simple bullying of small businesses by a big player - but those small businesses must also move with the times. Perhaps they needed to re-decorate or encourage a sort of localism by marketing themselves as niche, anti-Starbucks, fiercely independent etc.

When it comes down to it, there will always be successful independents - but they will be ones that are well-run (and so profitable), and offer some quality and character. Chains will always struggle to oust these as they are too rigidly rule-driven to adapt.

As a potential customer, if you let a particular business go to the wall by not frequenting it, then you can't expect to have the right to decide what should replace it.


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 8:40 pm
Posts: 13349
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Binners or Grum earlier?


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 9:41 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

WTF is that!?

Whole wheat couscous and roasted vegetables for tea here btw. 🙂


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 10:01 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I have eaten a McD product only once in my entire life; a Big Mac. And it was a crushing disappointment

Don't eat the burgers in McDs, they are awful. I always have something with chicken in it - either a wrap of some kind or chicken selects or something, which is quite nice fried chicken tenders.


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 10:11 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Don't eat the burgers in McDs, they are awful

Snob. 😉

I quite like the 1/4 pounder with cheese. Not a fan of Big Macs at all.


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 10:20 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Fortunately fried chicken is one of my favourite ever things - dunno why, but I could eat it all day 🙂


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 10:24 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

I quite like the 1/4 pounder with cheese. Not a fan of Big Macs at all.

Do you know what they call a Quarter Pounder in France?


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 10:25 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Is it to do with the metric system?


 
Posted : 19/11/2012 10:29 pm
Page 6 / 6