Forum search & shortcuts

Abergeldie Castle -...
 

[Closed] Abergeldie Castle - could it be saved from the Dee?

Posts: 14485
Free Member
 

.but love Jeremy Clarkson?

Yeh, STW is a full blown unanimous Clarkson circle jerk


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think Clarkson is funny. I also think it'd be funny if his house fell in a river.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 10:42 am
Posts: 46139
Full Member
 

Or a mutual.

Hang on, didn't we sell most of them off?


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 10:43 am
Posts: 14485
Free Member
 

bencooper - Member

I'm happy for public funds to be used to help out an A-listed building - as long as the public gets to own the building afterwards.

Pretty much this for me.

And I dont hate him, but I dont have any more sympathy for him than anyone else losing their home in this.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 10:43 am
Posts: 7513
Free Member
 

Flood insurance is for spreading [i]risk[/i] not for transferring predictable costs.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 10:50 am
Posts: 46139
Full Member
 

How is it going metalheart? Looks like a more prolonged rain but less intense??


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 11:45 am
Posts: 3068
Full Member
 

meh..he may lose just one of his houses.
I feel sorry for those who lose their only home and don't have other easy options available to them.

Recycle the stone into a modern building that doesn't gobble up resources trying to keep it warm for (I'm guessing) a couple of people.
I'm really not sentimental about these buildings and what they often represent.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 11:49 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

How is it going metalheart? Looks like a more prolonged rain but less intense??

Ironically much more rain locally (A93 here to halfway into Aberdeen has localised flooding, all the way across in a couple of instances) but the seems to have less impact on the river itself (at least here).

The river is about 3/4 - 4/5 of lasts weeks peak. This was previously thought to be be roughly the high point as recently (i.e. Within the the last 30 years). And it's taken 36 hours to get this high (as opposed to 6). Last time at this point you could see height rising within 15-30 minutes. With more rain forecast it'll likely rise further. Fingers crossed that it's gradual and not as high!


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 12:16 pm
Posts: 4136
Full Member
 

That looks incredibly perilous. I can't see any way of driving piles to protect that building. Localised placement of rock could stop the immediate problem, a long term solution would involve work from within the watercourse and that could take a while.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 1:03 pm
Posts: 818
Free Member
 

karma always seems to have a way of catching up with you...


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 1:38 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

Quite a few houses owned by ordianry people have been demolished with all their furniturre inside due to previous flooding, absolutely nothing different fot this house, cost of repairs versus cost of letting it fall down.

Lets just hope us the tax payer dont have to fund anything to save it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-24864996


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 1:47 pm
Posts: 1554
Free Member
 

Its not much of a castle.
This is a proper castle.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 3:50 pm
 irc
Posts: 5332
Free Member
 

Indeed, but the whole point is that risk should be spread amongst policy holders for the benefit of the policyholders

But insurance only really works for low risk high cost events. If recent experience shows that flood risk have been underestimated and some houses have for example a 1:20 risk of flooding each year. Say a big claim is £40k. The insurance co needs to charge 2K a year just to break even. Multiply that for cases where houses have flooded twice in 10 or 15 years.

High flood risk houses need high premiums and excesses. Just like low risk drivers don't pay the same premium as drivers with numerous convictions, if they can get insured at all.

It isn't spreading risk if the owners of high risk houses are insured from the premiums paid by those who choose not to buy houses in areas with a known flood risk.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 3:59 pm
Posts: 10980
Free Member
 

Is the house of any real architectural or historic interest? Wiki says there's another almost identical building. Surely the best solution for the owner, if he can bear the loss of social standing, is to knock it down and use the stone to build a modern place further up the bank with decent insulation, solar water and PV, huge glass windows and all mod cons and turn it into a money-spinning B&B rather than a massive financial drain that will hang like a millstone around the necks of future generations of his family.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 4:35 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Is it only me now whose logging into this thread to see if it's fallen over yet 😕


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 4:43 pm
Posts: 456
Full Member
 

No, not just you 😐


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 4:57 pm
Posts: 818
Free Member
 

ditto 🙂


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 5:19 pm
Posts: 12536
Full Member
 

Maybe it's possible to protect the bank.

Bit academic, though. Would you put your hands up to work in that river, within toppling distance of that place?


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 5:53 pm
 tomd
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bit academic, though. Would you put your hands up to work in that river, within toppling distance of that place?

Not a chance in hell, but I think the other huge problem will be finding a civils contractor who could do that sort of work. I think they'll all be pretty busy for a while doing easier work for bigger clients.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 6:02 pm
Posts: 12536
Full Member
 

On the insurance front - no-one wants to pay any more than they need to for insurance, and the insurance industry is extremely competitive.

If you've got the choice between buying an expensive policy from insurer a) who takes on everything and anyone for the same premium, regardless of risk, or a cheaper policy from company b) that's a bit more selective and precise, and able to offer insurance at a price more in line with your level of risk, which would you choose?

insurance company a) will end up attracting only the worst risks, leaving company b) with the pick of the better risks.

Lucky you if you're a bad risk with company a), as long as they don't go bust before you need to claim.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 6:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

piemonster - Member

bencooper - Member

I'm happy for public funds to be used to help out an A-listed building - as long as the public gets to own the building afterwards.

Pretty much this for me.

Just for balance, would you happy for the state to take automatic ownership of any property they help save? Or does this only apply to social groups you don't like?


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 6:07 pm
 tomd
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think folk's worry is that millions of public money will be spent shoring up one person's, albeit very nice, house. If it was a row of flats they would be condemned as being uneconomic to save without a 2nd thought.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 6:53 pm
Posts: 14485
Free Member
 

@richc

come the revolution youll be first up against the wall 😈

Probably the not that castlse wall admittedly!

More seriously, wot tom said.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 7:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=richc ]Just for balance, would you happy for the state to take automatic ownership of any property they help save? Or does this only apply to social groups you don't like?

Those poor castle owning minority groups. We demand equality for them.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:00 pm
Posts: 7127
Full Member
 

would you happy for the state to take automatic ownership of any property they help save? Or does this only apply to social groups you don't like?

Remind me - what was it that happened to Northern Rock and RBS shareholders in 2008?


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Abergeldie? More like Aber-fell-in-the-Dee, am I right?

(Too soon? Read it again tomorrow)


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:11 pm
Posts: 13815
Full Member
 

[quote=bikebouy ]Is it only me now whose logging into this thread to see if it's fallen over yet

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

not yet, but part of the garden wall has


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:14 pm
Posts: 3314
Free Member
 

I was worried archie was going to be homeless for a moment.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:21 pm
Posts: 46139
Full Member
 

It was quite high...

Normal level
[url= https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5619/21622754065_891c42cbd4_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5619/21622754065_891c42cbd4_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/yWJgsz ]Royal Dee Canoe[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/matt_outandabout/ ]Matt Robinson[/url], on Flickr

The flood level

[img] [/img]

Now.
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:27 pm
Posts: 43974
Full Member
 

Nuke it from orbit.....


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:33 pm
Posts: 13815
Full Member
 

[img] ?oh=7e257ed2d5872ca2aa2aeab44d8e0059&oe=57084269[/img]

Glendoll, Bachnagairn foot bridge up the Moulzie track past the Moulzie Cottage has been completely washed away, so until further notice please be advised NO access to Bachnagairn, the Rangers are checking other foot bridges in the Glendoll area, so please seek advice from the Glendoll Ranger centre on the current conditions of paths and bridges before heading out.
Tel: 01575 550233
email: GlenDollRanger@angus.gov.uk

Oh hum that was a regular bridge for me


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:37 pm
Posts: 43974
Full Member
 

That's on the Capel Mounth circuit so very popular. I guess it'll be less busy thus time of year though.

The bridge at Linn of Quoich survived but it no longer crosses the river which has cut a new line further East of the bridge.

The bridges at the west end of Loch Muick are also no more


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:40 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

That's a real shame about the Cambus. Spent many a happy summer day jumping off that bridge, one of my favourite spots in the world as a result.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:44 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

has it fallen yet


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:48 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Great Pics Matt Oooot NaBoooot.

That river looks monstrous in the second pic... 😯


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:53 pm
 AD
Posts: 1579
Full Member
 

Little bit of a thread diversion but a friend of mine took these of Cockermouth Castle a few weeks ago...

Work is already underway to shore up the missing bank.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 8:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm amazed the Cambus bridge survived - though "survived" may be a relative term looking at the shape it's in.


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 11:00 pm
Posts: 14485
Free Member
 

Gonna be a lot of river crossings this year


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 11:05 pm
Posts: 2344
Free Member
 

Is Ballater cut off?


 
Posted : 04/01/2016 11:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm amazed the Cambus bridge survived - though "survived" may be a relative term looking at the shape it's in.

Being so flexible might have saved it - looks as if the towers are okay, the deck needs rebuilding. A lot of work, but nowhere near as much as rebuilding it.


 
Posted : 05/01/2016 12:26 am
 poly
Posts: 9145
Free Member
 

Is Ballater cut off?

No, the "Aberdeen" and "Tomintoul" roads are open but the road to Braemar is closed (and from the pictures I think will be for a long time).

There was certainly flooding earlier in the Blairgowrie area with road closures, which I think means Braemar is pretty close to cut off.


 
Posted : 05/01/2016 2:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

are there any problems for folks traveling from England up to the Puffer


 
Posted : 05/01/2016 2:48 am
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

Scotroutes; any word on the new bridge at Derry Lodge? Or we back to using the tree( which was a sod with a bike)


 
Posted : 05/01/2016 3:26 am
Posts: 7766
Full Member
 

Found it on Cairngorm Walker,still there!


 
Posted : 05/01/2016 3:53 am
Posts: 2344
Free Member
 

Ta Poly


 
Posted : 05/01/2016 7:02 am
Page 2 / 7