I just knew someone would post that. 😁
Makes you think.
LOLs
Makes you think.
People constantly underestimate how hard it is to make me think.
The Earth is bombarded with electromagnetic radiation, the sun started doing it a long time after the rest of the universe already had been doing. Gods help them when they discover microwave ovens or radios.
Or a malignant melanoma as a result of UV exposure. That’s Ultraviolet Radiation, which is at the higher end of the spectrum, for those not so familiar with the electromagnetic radiation spectrum.
Just trying to be helpful.
I have a passing knowledge of some of the discussion above - not the technology but how research is commissioned or funded, and whether the results can be trusted as a result.
Of course there can always be outliers and bad apples, but to insinuate that because the Comms companys commission and pay for the work, then it can't be trusted is at best misguided, at worst quite offensive to the integrity of the thousands of researchers that do the work. Which is then reviewed, re-reviewed, then submitted where it is peer reviewed to spot any errors and inconsistencies and then finally published, warts n'all.
In today's litigious society, the thought that the brief is 'if you find anything nasty, sweep it under the carpet eh....' would never get past discussion - my scientists would report this to ethics committees in a heartbeat. The inverse is likely to be true - the researchers will be asked to test at eg: ranges and powers, or in the case of pharma, dosages and frequencies, that are multiples of the intended use rates specifically to find out how far within the safe range things are.
Hush any dodgy stuff up so we can get a massive lawsuit against us in 10 years time...... rarely happens and when it does, dieselgate, etc.
Second point and made previously but I want to extend
It’s impressive how you only have to repeat nonsense long enough and loud enough to have people take it seriously.
It's also impressive how the evidence of someone with an opinion and an internet connection (and possibly a tin foil hat and an axe to grind) is given equal standing to that of someone with decades of research experience and hundreds of peer reviewed papers in serious journals. By all means 'do your own research' but spend some of your research budget on understanding the relative merits of the sources you read.
The irony of "Do your own research" is it is impossible, as that would mean going back to school, uni, getting a PHD in the latest scary topic, and then getting a research lab with millions in funding to actually do some research.
Watching a youtube video of Dorris the nurse who wants to tell us about all the fake covid is not research. It is monetising someone who is at best misguided, or at worst willing to mislead people for money.
I've unfortunately got skin in the game here, with a 'close' relative with a lot going on in terms of health, that's become pretty dependent on another 'close' relative, and who's done their own research and would appear to be systematically converting the other relative to the idea that EMR is an enormous issue that is causing a huge degree of their health problems, and that the house they are in is effectively 'ill' and phones must be off, WiFi is off, smart meters are pure evil, 5g is going to hurt us all, etc etc.
Sadly the second relative is getting on a bit and I feel has lost the strength to be objective about what is being pushed constantly.
It's become impossible for me to convey any idea of objectivity to the subject and I am considered against them now because I talk of self diagnosis being a really unreliable thing for health issues and confirmation bias in 'research' also being a huge issue.
It's absolutely awful to be honest and it's completely splitting my once close family apart.
Completely lost as to what to do.
Trying to make any inroads and challenging anything is met with aggression, or total silence.
The irony of “Do your own research” is it is impossible, as that would mean going back to school, uni, getting a PHD in the latest scary topic, and then getting a research lab with millions in funding to actually do some research.
And even then your research would be based on countless others' research.
20 years working in telecoms and I'm less concerned now about exposure to RF than ever.
Accessing any rooftop with a telecoms site, we now carry a Nardalert and I've never had it alarm.
I'm more worried about the years spent working in construction from the late 80's through to 2001.
Who knows what I was exposed to then with very little regard for H&S.
The irony of “Do your own research” is it is impossible
But the folks that say that are expressly interested in you NOT going to reputable sources for your information, what they mean (even if if they don't say it) is "Read the same horseshit half truths, conspiracy, speculation, and cos-play science that I've been taken in by"
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
https://twitter.com/RottenInDenmark/status/1670885788782051328
