Forum menu
Which road bike cas...
 

[Closed] Which road bike cassette

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4259887]

As a keen MTB'er who loves using his granny ring I'm unsure which cassette to go for on my new road bike, do I go for an 11-32 or a 12-25? I'm not sure why you'd choose the 12-25 as you can have your cake and eat it with the 11-32. Both options come with a 54-34 front end. Any comments?


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

54-34? you sure? I'll assume you mean 50-34

I'd prefer the 12-25. 11-32 will have bigger steps between the gears which can be a pain when riding on the road. Obviously what suits you will depend on what you ride, style, fitness, etc.


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:29 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

What he said. It's a road bike, not an mtb.


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:30 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

I'd go with 12-27 or 11-28. Chances of it coming with 34/54 up front are pretty much zero though.


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:31 pm
Posts: 119
Free Member
 

It's a very personal thing.
I'd never use anything wider than 12-25
And prefer 12-23 or even 11-21

But that's just me


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:33 pm
Posts: 25939
Full Member
 

11-32 would need a mtb mech

up to 28ish works OK though

(wot they said - if it's a compact chainset it'll be 50/34)


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks guys, just checked, you're all correct 34-50 up front


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:36 pm
Posts: 119
Free Member
 

Some of the lastest road mechs will
Work up to 32 t but not all


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 10:38 pm
Posts: 25939
Full Member
 

34-50 and 11-32 would be a big stretch in capacity. You'd have to be careful not to use certain combinations I'd have thought


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 11:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

32 on a compact? Youll be reet with a 25,im sure.


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Very personal choice based on fitness and what kind of hills you ride. I had 12-25 originally but changed to a 12-27 for the Fred Whitton ride. Those two teeth make quite a difference!

Unless you are frequently riding steep stuff (more than 15%) then 12-25 should suffice, but again it's very much a personal choice.


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 11:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You will get the usuall willy wavers saying how nothing less that 53-11 biggest gear and all that utter push. Personally I have an 11-28 with compact front. That was on the bike when I got it, when I change then it's a 12-28 or 12-27. You can spin a 50x12 at 40mph, and I don't see many on here doing that on the flat.

Be awar that not all rear mechs will take a 32 big cog.


 
Posted : 14/08/2012 11:55 pm
Posts: 119
Free Member
 

My preference for a close block is more about liking just a small step in each cog
But it's it's not often I go up hills that need a granny ring

If I was somwhere proper hilly it would be differant
But a compact and 32 rear block is a very low gear unless your touring


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 7:20 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

11-27 or 11-25


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 7:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You haven't said where / what type of riding you are doing, if hilly, then a 11-28 or 12-30 makes sense, as you have low gears, and the ratios aren't too spread out, also you can use a short cage mech, a 11-32 gives an even lower gear but will require a GS mech and has some big jumps in the ratios; unless you are going up really steep inclines, carrying excess weigh, would leave this for tourers.

If flat land riding, a 11-25 /12-25 or 12-27 make more sense as they have closer ratios, and will give a nice smooth transition in the ride.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 7:26 am
Posts: 8751
Full Member
 

12-27 is my preference with some decent hills around here, could get away with a 25 but would be out of the saddle more and already get back wheel slipping on some of the climbs. An 11 is pretty pointless unless you're racing and even then it's not essential (assuming you can keep up a better cadence than Bert Grabsch)


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 8:29 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

12-27 is my preference with some decent hills around here, could get away with a 25 but would be out of the saddle more and already get back wheel slipping on some of the climbs.

Better tyres required. Must admit the one time I used a cheap winter tyre it was utter toss, span all over the shop. Decent tyres and it never happens.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

12-25 & you'll be fine.
I run a 50/34 & a 12-27 when I'm going to the Alps, Pyrenees etc. other than that I stick to the 25 as I don't like the big gaps between the gears, leaves you hunting to find the right one.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 9:06 am
Posts: 0
 

Look at 12-25 and 12-27 9-speed carefully.

Ultegra 6500 9-sp 219g 12-13-14-15-[17-19]-[21-23-25]
Ultegra 6500 9-sp 227g 12-13-14-15-[17-19]-[21-24-27]

Only diffrence is at the 23+25 or 24+27.

I would go for the 27T and enjoy the flexibility.

PaulD


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 9:51 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

I've a compact and 12-27, it's fine. I've got a spare 11-25 for when I'm living down south and the biggest hills are the surrey 'hills', or chiltern 'hills', neither of which really justify the title!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 10:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Were you to do 50/34 and a 11/32 on a road bike, you will also have to make sure you wear clown shorts and have a peak in on your helmet ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐Ÿ˜†

Unless you have spaghetti legs and live at the bottom of cliffs / the Alps, 50/34 and up to a 28 [i]should[/i] be more than sufficient for most of the UK.

All personal preference of course


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 10:32 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Plenty of decent hills in the Surrey Hills, not long I'll admit, but plenty of steep stuff, which is where the low gears are useful after all!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 10:33 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

Plenty of decent hills in the Surrey Hills, not long I'll admit, but plenty of steep stuff, which is where the low gears are useful after all!
They see me trollllinnnnnnnnnn........they hateinnnnnnnn ๐Ÿ˜›

I see your Box (mole) Hill and raise you Rossendale Chimney.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 10:47 am
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

double post glitch


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 10:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i'm a scrawny pathetic weakling.

i found a 34-25 a bit much on the steeper hills of the peak district, especially with tired legs, so now i've got a 28t cassette - it's just a little bit easier.

if you're more scrawny and pathetic than i am, AND live somewhere hillier than the peak district, then you MAY need something easier than 34-28

i doubt this will be the case...


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 11:26 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I see your Box (mole) Hill and raise you Rossendale Chimney.

Box Hill is not one of the climbs I was thinking. I can comfortably ride that in (53t) big ring in the saddle, it's a nice gradient, but tough it certainly isn't!

Steepest climb I can see around Rossendale that's of a decent length is [url= http://app.strava.com/segments/974612 ]this one, 1.2 miles, 6.2%[/url], couple of bits at 12%.

[url= http://app.strava.com/segments/974612 ]This one[/url] is 0.9 miles at 9%, with a fair few sections over 20%.

Just sayin like, snot all flat here.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 11:39 am
Posts: 8751
Full Member
 

Better tyres required. Must admit the one time I used a cheap winter tyre it was utter toss, span all over the shop. Decent tyres and it never happens.

Not really (I use Ultremo ZX's or Conti GP4seasons), mostly it's case of the rider not getting the weight distribution right but leaves/bit of mud etc. can be a PITA on a steep climb (15%+) so if I know the road is a bit crap I prefer to try and stay sat down but know I'd struggle doing that on a 25 a lot of the time


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 12:06 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Fair enough! I know when I used Hutchinson Equinox (I think they were) I could spin the back in the dry, was ridiculously annoying! Not had it on GP 4 Seasons, even in the wet, so yes, perhaps weight distribution issues going on!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 12:19 pm
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

http://www.climbbybike.com/climb.asp?col=Rosedale-Chimney-Bank&qryMountainID=8699

Average: 11.9 %
Length: 1.47 km
Height start: 137 m
Height top: 312 m
Gradient: 175 m
Maximum: 33 %

Almost certainly the steepest section of road in Britain, Rosedale Chimney Bank is often included in the Tour of Britain as it is a true 1 in 3 climb at one point............a very steep second corner and unforgiving section after it. The climb then relents to about 20% before easing off to the top

Anything that ends with "eases to about 20%" wins the steep hill argument ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 12:24 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Beastly! Still plenty of decent climbs down here though, which was the point, Box Hill just isn't one of them!

Edit: out of interest I looked at the toughest in the UK on that 'climbbybike' website - it reckons "Fish Hill" in Berkshire (although it actually seems to be Worcestershire) is 23.4% for 2.7km, shirley not?


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 12:31 pm
Posts: 4306
Free Member
 

If your a "keen mtber" as stated in your first post, you have a decent level of fitness already?

At that point, I'd go 11-25 for the tighter spacing. Road bikes are supposed to be fast, not easy. Unless you live in the lakes or wales, that will be more than low enough to deal with the odd 1 in 4 or 1 in 5. Working harder in a higher gear will do your mtbing fitness no end of good too.

I'm another "scrawny pathetic weakling" - 5'10" and 10stone and can just about cope with 53/39 and 12-25 in the Peaks. I can get up everything, but spend far more time standing than I should. A lower gear would probably be more efficient, but if it ain't broke, don't fix it... If I ever decide to take the roadie to some proper mountains i'll be investing in some lower gears though!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 12:42 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Had the same dilemma quite recently when switching to a compact for the first time. In the end I went 11-23 but as everyone says it depends upon how powerful you are. In the future when power meters come as standard on high end bikes, perhaps manufacturers will start to recommend cassettes according to an individual's functional threshold power - would make a lot more sense.
njee - thanks for the info re:climbbybike ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 1:23 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

In the future when power meters come as standard on high end bikes, perhaps manufacturers will start to recommend cassettes according to an individual's functional threshold power - would make a lot more sense.

Even if you had that information it'll depend on your riding style anyway, things are never straightforward, nice to have the choice!

njee - thanks for the info re:climbbybike

TINAS linked to it, first time I've seen it! Interesting, if of dubious accuracy!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 1:37 pm
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

Fish hill is 'only' about 200m, someones got fr and m mixed up by the looks of it, the sumit might be 920ft above sea level rahter than 920m from bottom to top?

The chimney really is as steep as it describes though, and the cattle grid is an absolute f***er


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

The notion that wide ratio cassettes are not for road bikes seems to be peculiarly British one - continentals gear their bikes down for hill/ mountain riding, even the pros. If you can't get up the hills near you on a 34/25 then there's your answer.

As for top end, 50/11 is more than enough for everyone except Cav.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am holidaying near honiton in Devon and riding an 11-32 (should have been 12-34 but the seller sent the wrong item) and the 32 is useful for when you have been climbing for ages and then come up to a 20 precenter. Allows you to sit and spin the 32 where you would normally be standing in the 28, and if you are knackered then the variety is good.

The new midcage shimano mechs work fine with that cassette.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 2:50 pm
Posts: 41848
Free Member
 

The notion that wide ratio cassettes are not for road bikes seems to be peculiarly British one - continentals gear their bikes down for hill/ mountain riding, even the pros. If you can't get up the hills near you on a 34/25 then there's your answer.

You missed the important point that.......

UK Hill
[img] [/img]

Continental Hill
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


As for top end, 50/11 is more than enough for everyone except Cav.

Wrong, 50x14 is probably enough for most. 50x12 if you are a cat1 rider. 50x11 is just for pub talk. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 2:59 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

You missed the important point that.......

You missed the important point that UK hills are often much steeper than Alpine climbs. They are of course much shorter, which is such an obvious point that I didn't think it needed to be said. If you can't get up them with your existing setup then change it, and ignore the tragic people.

Wrong, 50x14 is probably enough for most. 50x12 if you are a cat1 rider. 50x11 is just for pub talk.

I said that "50x11 is [u]more[/u] than enough".


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 3:10 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Wrong, 50x14 is probably enough for most. 50x12 if you are a cat1 rider. 50x11 is just for pub talk.

Really? 50/14 at 90rpm is only 25mph, I'd certainly not want to be in top gear at that point and starting to spin! Up to 30 is nice for those times when you've got a tailwind!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 3:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it reckons "Fish Hill" in Berkshire (although it actually seems to be Worcestershire) is 23.4% for 2.7km, shirley not?

youre right, its not. Its the A44 so a trunk road. It IS a riot on a motorbike on the way up though (unless its raining and covered in dirt as it was this morning).

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 3:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wrong, 50x14 is probably enough for most. 50x12 if you are a cat1 rider. 50x11 is just for pub talk.

Really? 50/14 at 90rpm is only 25mph, I'd certainly not want to be in top gear at that point and starting to spin! Up to 30 is nice for those times when you've got a tailwind!

Yes really!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 6:59 pm
Posts: 4389
Full Member
 

I have a 50/39 with a 13-23 cassette. Its hilly here and the first few weeks i was coughing up my organs at the top of the hills. Now, the gearing has forced me to ride faster and stand up more on hills. As a result my average speed has been increasing nicely.

So i'd go for the 12-25. You may struggle at first but you will get fitter.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 7:07 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Yes really!

Ok, good luck with that, I'd be considerably slower if I had a 50/14 top gear and I'd go through a lot of 14t sprockets! Even 50/12 could be spun out reasonably easily, it's not like an MTB where I'm happy to just coast, I've got fast descents round here where I'm pedalling over 40mph.

Admittedly my 53/11 doesn't get used very much, but it does get used!


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not sure what luck has do do with anything.

Show me 100 riders and you would pick out 1 who could use a 12 sprocket the other 99 are delusional.

Not really much benefit to pedal at 40

It always makes more sense to err on the side of lower gears, that here you make up more time, well it was when I raced and time trialed.


 
Posted : 15/08/2012 9:09 pm
Page 1 / 2