Sunday cycles has rebranded itself to Sabbath, it appears due to some legal threat from some septic's;
[url] http://www.sundaybicycles.co.uk/whyRebrandFromSundayToSabbath.php [/url]
Now I've been shoving bits of cash away over winter, as I really fancied on of the silk road pro frames, and finances were just about getting there. But I just cannot warm to the new name 🙁 Sunday was homely, felt british and I just liked it. Sabbath is a bit dramtic. I'm not angry just disappointed, tell me Sabbath is just as good 😳
May be more to do with the fact that [url= http://www.sundaybikes.com/v3/ ]Sunday[/url] is already an established BMX brand.
[i]Sunday was homely, felt british and I just liked it. Sabbath is a bit dramtic. I'm not angry just disappointed, tell me Sabbath is just as good.[/i]
Good excuse to order a black one if you ask me [img] 
[/img]
😆 would have to swap my classy black lycra for lurid spandex!
on a similar note, how come superstar components is allowed when theres already a superstar BMX brand.
TINAS, you answered your own question there - Superstar "components" don't sell BMX frames, or any frames for that matter. Both companies also seem to be small operations which can't afford to blow money on lawyer's fees.
Superstar "components" don't sell BMX frames, or any frames for that matter.
[url= http://superstar.tibolts.co.uk/index.php?cPath=43&osCsid=070f6498c27f5ef4b03f18a040460306 ]Eh?[/url]
Both companies also seem to be small operations which can't afford to blow money on lawyer's fees.
If I win the Euro Million's (never enter it so not much chance) I might lend some money to Superstar BMX
😉
Superstar "components" don't sell BMX frames, or any frames for that matter.
It's all Class 12 though innit.
Superstar - http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ohim?ohimnum=E5740493
Sunday - http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ohim?ohimnum=E5676044
Think both names are guff.
It's all Class 12 though innit.
Interesting, that. I always thought that if you weren't likely to be confused, you could have the same name as [url= http://www.ononesoftware.com/ ]another company[/url], but apparently not. 😉
I think there are quite a few examples of the Superstar/Super Star scenario though, where neither company really treads on each others' toes so they don't bother duking it out. I doubt anyone is going to confuse this:
[img] 
[/img]
with this:
[img] 
[/img]