Forum menu
In my shop library is a massive tome entitled "Bicycle Accident Reconstruction for the Forensic Scientist" - the general opinion of that book is that helmets are of more use for their visibility effects (bright colours, etc) than for their impact protection.
The problem really is understanding the difference between helmet wearing and helmet compulsion. Wearing a helmet might well be sensible for a lot of people - especially riding off-road where you travel slower and are more likely to fall off, or for young people. Helmet compulsion, on the other hand, makes no sense - it causes a reduction in cycling (and hence an increase in heart attacks etc), and it shifts the emphasis to blaming the victim not solving the safety problems.
(I do think it's weird that kneepads don't have the same acceptance as helmets- the protection is actually higher, knees are pretty bloomin delicate, and IME they take a lot more solid hits than heads)
Good point. Looked at dispassionately, it's effing ridiculous that on most rides I wear a helmet but no knee pads, based on my personal injury history.
I wear a helmet mostly through social compulsion. If there were none of that, I'd wear it a lot less often.
I'd be staggered is a helmet didn't help if you come off and glance your head off a rock, tree, road etc, but i conceed I think most the times it would be useful would be in accidents of my own making...
I'm not so sure its going to help when a lorry rides over me at a junction...but then I don't think anyone on here is really claiming that...
It's clearly an example of someone using their credentials as evidence for their claim - as jedi pointed out, it's one of the lowest forms of evidence going.
Really whacked my head on a low branch - fail to see how it would have been better not wearing a helmet?
Over the bars, landed on head, crease marks from helmet impact on my scalp, plus friction marks/ reddening from helmet impact.
Are the non helmet wearing people really telling me I'd be better off not wearing a helmet?
If this is dismissed as merely 'anecdotal' - I'm fine with that, my helmet may or may not have saved me a trip to a neurosurgeon - but surely some nasty cuts and bruises, for which I'm thankful I wore a helmet.
I can only imagine that the helmet deniers have not had any kind of crash where they landed on their head and had to get a nasty gash stitched up. I can only imagine a helmet denier who's had a head wound stitched up (hours wasted at A&E pain, X-rays etc, returning to have stitches removed etc) who continues to not wear a helmet (I can't imagine the reason why not) must have some un-diagnosed brain damage!
I wear knee pads too.
Really whacked my head on a low branch - fail to see how it would have been better not wearing a helmet?
I had a branch get caught on my helmet causing me to almost crash. I'm 100% certain I would have flown past it without it touching me had I NOT been wearing a helmet!
Are the non helmet wearing people really telling me I'd be better off not wearing a helmet?
I don't think the argument is about being better off I think it's about having or not having a fatal head injury. And I think it's possible that in certain conditions a helmet would make very little difference.
How often is the difference between a fatal and non fatal head injury small enough that a helmet can make the difference?
Highclimber - Is that going to stop you wearing a helmet, if not, why not?
Nah, I always wear my helmet. I was just alluding to the point that anecdotes can go both ways. Not trying to denigrate your point at all.
I can't see the benefit of not wearing a helmet. I can see the benefit of wearing one.
If you're not better off not wearing a helmet - why would you not wear one??
I don't see what I've got to gain by not wearing a helmet- enlighten me please.
What is it that's so good about not wearing a helmet, that it's better than a possible trip to A&E? I've yet to hear a compelling case set forth.
I used to ride without a helmet, I even did 2 alps holidays without one. Then I started wearing one and crashed, put a huge dent in the side of the helmet on a rock and was still concussed, If I hadn't have had it on I am quite sure I would not have gotten up and got home on my own legs. This is proof enough of what an idiot I was not wearing one.
futon river crossing - Member
I can't see the benefit of not wearing a helmet.
Try reading the thread or any of the others on the topic.
OK I'll start you off - rotational injuries, risk compensation, less space from drivers, narrow range of collisions in which it makes a significant difference...
(I wear one mostly BTW, I'm just not going to blindly tell others they should).
Yet you'd still wear a helmet? Why?
If i'm bimbling about on my local trails (sometimes with the dog) i don't wear a helmet, in fact i don't think i've wore my helmet once this year and that included a week up at Aviemore with my mtb and my tripster cross/roadie, however these days i ride at a snails pace compared to how i rode a few years ago. If i took a 30 min drive to my local trail centres such as Dalbeattie/Kirroughtree then i'd wear a helmet but i've not been near them for a year.
I used to get through a few helmets per year (and i guess they contributed to prevention of serious injury) but that was more to do with a riding style where i had to push it 10/10ths every time i went out but i can no longer ride like that so i just bimble these days.
[img] 
[/img]
[img] 
[/img]
I figure that would've hurt without a helmet.
I'm not telling anyone to do anything - I'm asking for the compelling reasons/benefits for not wearing a helmet, I'm thinking primarily for off-road as that is all I do.
Because in lots of situations, for me, it probably makes a small positive difference, and I'm just used to it.
What is it that's so good about not wearing a helmet, that it's better than a possible trip to A&E? I've yet to hear a compelling case set forth.
If you live in a world where wearing a helmet means that going to A&E is not a possibility then I'd imagine it may well seem a sensible choice for you.
I'm not telling anyone to do anything - I'm asking for the compelling reasons/benefits for not wearing a helmet, I'm thinking primarily for off-road as that is all I do.
There's no real compelling reasons. The main benefit I can see is that you don't have to go through the process of worrying about not wearing a helmet if you're not wearing a helmet. So I'm about to go to the nearest shop to buy some crisps, I'll be cycling off-road and not wearing a helmet. I won't be crashing*, so wearing a helmet for this journey offers no benefits, so why would I?
*Of course I can't guarantee that I won't crash, just as I can't guarantee the sun's going to rise tomorrow, but I'm happy with the odds and the consequences.
I'm not telling anyone to do anything - I'm asking for the compelling reasons/benefits for not wearing a helmet, I'm thinking primarily for off-road as that is all I do.
For me, it's because I do a bunch of different things which could cause head injuries - drive a car, climb trees, do DIY on the roof, etc. It doesn't make sense to me to single out one activity to wear a helmet - if head injuries worried me that much, I'd wear one for lots of activities.
FWIW I rode a flat traffic free offroad route with my kids and everyone - lets be kind and call them occasional cyclists- looked at us like we were taking our lives into our own hands
One father even spoke to me about it and how dangerous it was whilst hi skids ran around the playground with no helmets on - I said there would be more injuries here than on the route we rode.
I'm asking for the compelling reasons/benefits for not wearing a helmet, I'm thinking primarily for off-road as that is all I do.
Risk perception??
Would you ride everything you do without a helmet? If the answer is no it makes you reckless
FWIW I wear a helmet for any ride that is not an off road pootle
I agree horaAnything that LESSENS is better than finger in the wind/winging it. Agree?
I'm actually happy to have the choice and always choose to wear a helmet, I rarely pootle and often bounce on my bonce, so my odds of it making a difference are quite high 😀
I just want to avoid compulsion, because the evidence is inconclusive and as can be seen on any cycling forum devisive.
Just got back. Did have one amusing incident. Going along the final lane a Mercedes got impatient at having to wait 10 seconds to a passing space, and decided when it accelerated past to make full use of it's horn - toad of toad hall style, only to then have to immediately stand on the brakes because of an on coming car.
I have an old school bicycle horn like this on my bike
[img] 
[/img]
Which I took great delight on tooting away on while he tried to get past the other car 😀
I figure that would've hurt without a helmet.
Pictures of a broken helmet or two are not really evidence that you would have sustained a major injury (though I suspect it would have hurt without it as you point out). As such, this is possibly the only reason to wear a helmet - not because it will prevent serious injury but that it effing hurts when you bang your head!
Helmets are rigid polystyrene i.e. not the strongest of materials. I reckon I could break one with my bare hands.
They are actually quite tough to break, I had to jump on my last damaged one to finish it off.
I wear a cowboy hat and cowboy boots. I look completely mad.
And then he opens his mouth and proves it.
I had to jump on my last damaged one to finish it off.
And had it been on a dome shape rather than a floor, it would have survived that too.
I was a motorcyclist in the 1970s. Same bunch of stupid arguments.
I was a motorcyclist in the 1970s. Same bunch of stupid arguments.
And did that change the injury statistics much?
I've only had one cycling partner carted off to hospital (with his skull exposed), and he wasn't wearing a helmet.
In my experience helmet wearers have more successful crashes.
I wasn't wearing a helmet for my most recent crash and it resulted in 5 stitches in my forehead and part of my ear being ripped off but no concussion. For this accident a rugby scrum cap would have been far better than a bicycle helmet. My reasoning is that the first body part that hit the ground was my shoulder which absorbed most of the impact before my head hit the ground. Had I been wearing a helmet the first part of my body to hit the ground would have been my head. Whilst some of the impact would have been absorbed by the helmet I'm not sure it would have been enough to avoid brain injury.
I think that modern bicycle helmets increase the size of your head far too much and can result in unnecessarily hard impacts to the head because they don't allow more of your body to hit the ground first and absorb the impact. I'd like to see designs that minimize the profile, especially for kids helmets. For young children helmets can almost double the size of the head.
One thing that does surprise me is people's reactions when I tell them the full story about the accident. The reason I crashed was a combination of riding home in a force 9 gale after having drunk 8 pints at the pub. People aren't particularly critical of the fact that I was very drunk in conditions that were dangerous but do think that not wearing a helmet was very irresponsible. To me that just shows how twisted people's attitudes to bicycle safety have become thanks to the ridiculous focus that helmet wearing is given in both the cycling and mainstream media. Helmet use should be topic number 93 in the debate and yet sometimes it seems like the be all and end all.
I still don't wear a helmet when riding on the road (I do off road) but I have stopped riding drunk.
I don't understand why wearing or not wearing a plastic hat so bothers some people. WGAF..if you like em wear one, if you don't, don't.
The objections come when a cyclist is considered 'irresponsible' for not wearing a helmet after being hit by a badly driven multi-ton vehicle.
I wear a helmet to ride off road - I'm tall so I tend to hit my head on things, plus I ride stuff that tests me technically so that I'm likely to run out of ability and come off occasionally and in an uncontrolled way.
Secondly, in winter it keeps my head warm (with something underneath) and in summer keeps the sun off.
I don't wear a helmet to ride to the shops - i'm not doing anything dangerous that I'm going to come off the bike due to my own actions and in the event that someone runs me over a plastic hat is not going to make an appreciable difference.
^ This
Certainly need this debate. Hasn't been on the forum for a good few months.
Carry on!
I find interesting the apparent claim that drivers treat cyclists differently if wearing a helmet or not .
Where can I get a cycle helmet similar in graphic design to the one pictured and would it make a difference.
[img] 
[/img]
I think that modern bicycle helmets increase the size of your head far too much and can result in unnecessarily hard impacts to the head because they don't allow more of your body to hit the ground first and absorb the impact. I'd like to see designs that minimize the profile, especially for kids helmets. For young children helmets can almost double the size of the head.
I tend to agree with this. I've bashed my head a couple of times (albeit not too hard) and I'm fairly sure I wouldn't have had I not have been wearing a helmet. I also once caught my helmet on a low hanging branch, pulling my head back, which could have been more serious if I was going faster. I'm not necesarilly saying it outweighs the benefits, but a helmet does seem to make your head a bigger target area, making it more prone to hits. It could be an area for helmet design to improve.
The problem with the neurosurgeons argument is that there will be some crashes where wearing a helmet has meant the rider never becomes one of his patients.
He doesn't and can't know of these incidents so taking an assumption that helmets are useless is just plain wrong - but then that's the Daily Mail for you.
The problem with the neurosurgeons argument is that there will be some crashes where wearing a helmet has meant the rider never becomes one of his patients.He doesn't and can't know of these incidents so taking an assumption that helmets are useless is just plain wrong - but then that's the Daily Mail for you.
that's why it comes bottom of jedimasters pyramid chart on the previous page.
What a ****wit that surgeon is. By definition be's only going to be seeing people with brain injuries. Its the ones he doesnt see that may ir may not have been helped.
Bull Poo.
The Neuro surgeon says it hasn't helped the people he has treated??
Hes a NEUROSURGEON!!!
The people he treated who did wear a helmet would have been dead, the people who he treated who were not wearing helmet wouldn't need a neurosurgeon if they were?!
What a dick.
Of course a helmet will help to some extent if you land on your head. But if you are more likely to be hit if you are wearing one, or you would rather not ride a bike at all if you had to wear a helmet and sit on the sofa getting fat instead, then helmets are definitely worse than useless.
Biking for sport, yes always wear a helmet. But riding around for transport is different. Instead of blaming the victim, try blaming the cr*p driver who hit them
[quote=bencooper ]The problem really is understanding the difference between helmet wearing and helmet compulsion. Wearing a helmet might well be sensible for a lot of people - especially riding off-road where you travel slower and are more likely to fall off, or for young people. Helmet compulsion, on the other hand, makes no sense - it causes a reduction in cycling (and hence an increase in heart attacks etc), and it shifts the emphasis to blaming the victim not solving the safety problems.
It's not even helmet compulsion which is the issue here. Mass wearing of helmets even without compulsion has a lot of the same damaging effects - it makes cycling seem more dangerous than it is (because you apparently need PPE for that, but not other activities), it makes drivers feel your safety is less their responsibility, etc. No compulsion at all required to result in those issues. I'd suggest that there's a good chance of an overall benefit to the health of society from banning the wearing of cycle helmets on public roads.
Of course I still wear one myself (most of the time on a bike, and when riding off road or at speed (Schlumpf) on a uni - I think I've actually got the risk perception about right for the uni).
Oh and as it doesn't seem to have been covered all that well, one answer to why it's reasonable to ride without a helmet is that society agrees it's reasonable to pedestrianise, drive and get in the shower without a helmet - all activities (amongst many others) where more lives would be saved by helmet compulsion than cycling.
Good point - have you read Risk by John Adams? Goes into risk perception a lot, very interesting stuff.
Another problem with helmets is, like fluorescent vests and stuff like that, they make cyclists seem different. A normal person on a bike could be your friend, neighbour or parent. A Lycra-clad, helmeted, fluorescent yellow person is much harder to humanise, so harder for car drivers to look out for.
I find not crashing to be better protection! 😆 seriously though this reminds me I need to buy a helmet, not had one for a few months now. Mind you I still won't wear it all the time, I forget it half the of time, consequence of surviving 25 years without one I'd guess!
Helmets are fine. But I still don't reckon they are the best thing for cycle saftey. Awareness of your surroundings and personal limits are much more important.
This whole argument is useless given it's personal choice.
I won't go down the road without one.
Forty years of serious riding; once slid on a wet diesel covered road. I slid so far I had time to think 'this is alright' then my head hitting the high kerb stopped me, splitting the lid in two.
Three years ago a hit and run driver hit me up the rear at 60mph. I went over the car, it's thought I landed on my head/shoulders. The clothes were ripped off my body and the helmet had worn down to the inner web. Basically 3" of lid got sanded off in the fall. It's likely I'd not be here if I wasn't wearing one.
At the end of the day it's just not an issue, I don't know I'm wearing one it never enters my mind. I just guess it'll be there if I need it like a spare inner tube.
I see helmet threads are as rational and reasoned as usual then.
I've only once been to A&E for a head injury, which was caused by someone lobbing half a brick at my head when I walked down the street. That's why I always wear a helmet for walking now.
I've never once banged my head while riding a bike, regardless of whether or not I was wearing a helmet.