Forum menu
Ultimate 140mm ligh...
 

[Closed] Ultimate 140mm light-weight trail bike

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#571235]

After the Alps its time to pass on the RFX frame to a new owner and think about going back to a 140mm steed.

I want to build something really light weight but burly enough for a 15 stone owner!

Is it possible to get a Blur LT below 26lbs?

To get really light do I need to go carbon?

Would like to stay with a 4 bar set up if poss as it suits my riding style and weight.

So STW know it alls, give me some advice!

:mrgreen:


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What's the weight limit on a Blur XC Carbon? i.e. do you really need 140mm?


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Was thinking the carbon LT2 as would like 140mm but guess they will cost a fortune and no chance of getting one of those bad boys second hand any time soon!


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lapierre 914 of any interest to you? Or a 714 if you dont have the bunts?


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

never considered the Lapierre, time for some research!


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Is it possible to get a Blur LT below 26lbs?

[url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/somebody-pimped-their-blur ]I would imagine so, as you can get the ordinary Blur below 19lbs....[/url]


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah I think the carbon LT2 would be perfect, but then it's a £2299 frame 😯 ! Having said that, I'm in the market for my dream trail bike this year & I reckon that is it.


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 166
Free Member
 

Ibis MOJO SL all the way 🙂

they just make it all sooo easy. I liked my 4 bar FSR titus but the mojo is as good. stiffens slightly under acceleration and sucks up anything downhill. also corners like its on rails, mine is 26 pounds with really normal trail kit.

[img] ?t=1234462766[/img]

🙂


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MSC Zion Carbon. I know of two sub 25lb builds that are raced DH.

http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/category/bikes/mountain/product/zion-carbon-r-32381


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

that IBIS looks a bit sweet!


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 8:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chumba VF2, 4 bar, carbon rear end, light enough and super stiff, Chumba pride themselves on building some of the siffest frames on the market.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Love the build on that Chumba, Si.


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 9:10 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

Hope mine will scrub up that nicely...

(definitely looks good in white)


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 9:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

metalheart, you ordered a black VF2?


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 10:25 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Looking for the same bike myself
Either La Pierre Zesty 514/714 or Ibis Mojo/Mojo sl
trying to find bikes to demo in a large is a nightmare
Also not sure the mojo sl is worth the extra over the syandard
worried about the low bottom bracket on the Ibis


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

Steve Jones from Dirt got his Orange 5 down to around 25 pounds.


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 10:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hitman, if you fancy a VF2 mail me, i have a few frames at REALLY good prices...


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Nicolai Helius CC or swap your RFX for a new 5Spot. Just had my DW Spot up in the Peak this last weekend and it was excellent (but is a bit porky although pedals lighter than it weighs if you know what I mean). My Helius (130, but I believe going up to 140) runs in at 25.5 lbs, so light enough, stiff and a four bar. Ticks all your boxes (but it'll cost I'm afraid).


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 10:43 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

#
si_brodiebikes - Member

metalheart, you ordered a black VF2?

Yup. Looks good in white as well...

😀


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Gotta be a Mojo, even the standard one, or the SL if you have the cash. I really want one!


 
Posted : 21/05/2009 11:23 pm
 Spud
Posts: 361
Full Member
 

Titus Motolite or FTM?


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 12:00 am
Posts: 10634
Full Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

26lbs in this guise. New Dt 150s would remove another 250g, ghetto tubeless another 500g, loose the Joplin, another 350g you're at 23.8lbs

Give me a few days and I'll be there...


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 12:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think my LT2 is 26.5 lbs but I could probably loose 0.5lb if I went for Stans & some lighter tyres. I wldnt change anything else I dont think..

FYI the finishing kit is XTR, Easton combo of seatpost, stem & bars w Hope M4 brakes & Hope hoops w High Rollers. Forks are Fox Talas.

So yeah I do think it can be done..


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 1:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Orange 5 is 26.2lb! No expensive carbon in sight. I do however have a real itch for a MOJO it's about the only bike i'd replace the 5 with.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 7:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why is it so important to get a light bike when you weigh 15 stone? 😛


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 7:55 am
Posts: 303
Free Member
 

Surpised no one has mentioned the Yeti 575, slightly more travel but not difficult to build to 26 lbs, The half carbon version is almost as light as the carbon Blur LT2 and considerably cheaper.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 8:20 am
 ajc
Posts: 212
Free Member
 

Grumm thats exactly what i was thinking. And how long is a really light weight 140 travel bike with a 15 stoner on board going to last.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 8:23 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

At the risk of getting flamed I reckon there are some very optimistic weights being published here. My Blur LT2 with air Pikes, RP23, DT4.2 rims, Easton Monkeylight, Truvativ cranks, Hope Mono Minis, SRAM X9 comes in at 29lbs according to the bathroom scales. It is the most fantastic AM bike, and built for taking reasonably big hits, so not desouigned to be a racing snake. The LT2 carbon only arrives in June, saves probably 1lb in weight, and the frame alone will be about £2500.

If you want something with 140mm it is going to come in around 28/29lbs because a 140mm travel full suss will be built to take hits. If you want 26lbs you will be looking at a 100mm to 120mm pure XC machine


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:31 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I think CaptainMainwaring talks sense. Do you really need something that light? Why have do you have such a specific requirement for wieght?


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Titus FTM

http://titusti.com/titus09/bikes/trail_ftm.php


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:40 am
Posts: 35036
Full Member
 

carbon Blur has no weight restrictions on it.

Why not have a light bike? There are no rules that say you have to have a bigger heavier bike just because you weigh more.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Id defo check the MSC Zion out, i've ridden one twice and it's brilliant for trail duties.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

CaptainMainwaring - Member

At the risk of getting flamed I reckon there are some very optimistic weights being published here

Wot he said.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The LT2 carbon only arrives in June, saves probably 1lb in weight, and the frame alone will be about £2500.

Probably splitting hairs at this price point, but according to the pdf available on the UK SCB website, the LTc frame will be £2299, which makes it the same price as a Mojo SL. Admittedly, I was also expecting it to be a bit more than that based on the price of the XC carbon. Links to the PDFs at the bottom of [url= http://www.santacruzbikes.co.uk/bicycles/pricing/blurLT.html ]this page.[/url]


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

New Scott Genius Carbon - 25lb easy


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:48 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I don't think it's as easy to say 'an all mountain bike will weigh x', and I don't think a 26lb bike will be a "pure XC machine", I'd happily build up a 140mm travel bike with the kind of kit that would get it under 25lbs, but I'm not a hard rider, and I'm under 11 stone.

I do agree with the optimism of some of the weights though!


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:50 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Why not have a light bike? There are no rules that say you have to have a bigger heavier bike just because you weigh more.
[/i]

Not what I said. I was asking why look for something around a specific wieght. Why 26lbs? I dont know the weights of my bikes just that one is heavier than the others as it has more springs and pivots.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:52 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Gary Fisher Roscoe


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

IMO generally these types of bikes are better when they weigh a bit more. What i mean by that is weight on the types of frames mentioned here are pretty similar, it is things like wheels and forks that make a difference, and very light wheels and forks on 140mm bikes just don’t make sense imo.

I think 28lb-30lb on a Mojo/575/VF2 etc is the ideal compromise.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I'm with Si on this. My Mojo was initially built up as light as possible (Pace forks, full XTR etc). It gradually got heavier (Marz Z1 Lights, Joplin, bigger tyres) and to my mind got better and better. Slightly slacker angles and the extra weight meant it held it's lines much better on rocky descents, steep drops, jumps etc. Sure it was a bit slower up hill, but in the scheme of things was still good. Sadly now sold.
Same thing happened with my 5-Spot - started as light as possible (e.g. Maverick forks) but got better with Push rockers, bigger forks etc.
If you want something lightweight, why not buy a hardtail, and keep the full-suss slightly burlier?


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Roscoe's aren't light, but they aren't heavy either - and they certainly don't "ride" heavy. Best of all is that they are a good neutral easy-handling bike that feels invincible at speed too. I reckon you ought to try one.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 10:24 am
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Yup. I weigh 15stone and wouldnt dream of getting lightweight parts unless I won the lottery. My heckler rides much better with beefier parts, after all a 140mm bike is built for proper riding not fairy prancing fireroads and racing in circles round a grassy field.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 10:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

built for proper riding not fairy prancing fireroads and racing in circles round a grassy field.

Quote of the day!


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 10:30 am
 ajc
Posts: 212
Free Member
 

Light weight wheels on 140mm travel + rock garden + full spead ahead * 15 stone = pringles


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 10:31 am
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

If you want a bike that weighs 26lb but still has build kit, wheels and tyres that can take a pasting, hardtail.

Oh and that Blur on the other thread is the carbon one. And I bet it rides like a spastic giraffe.


 
Posted : 22/05/2009 10:40 am
Page 1 / 3