Trek Fuel EX 8 long...
 

Trek Fuel EX 8 longer term review

Posts: 1748
Topic starter
 
wpf-cross-image

We've had the aluminium Trek Fuel EX 8 on test. And we're very pleased with it. Metal is ace.


 
Posted : 13/01/2026 8:30 am
Topic Tags
Posts: 1748
Topic starter
 

What happened to that geo chart?!


 
Posted : 07/08/2025 6:37 pm
Posts: 1748
Topic starter
 

@mtbfix - Oops. Soz. Table display amended now. And a screenshot of the geo chart added too. Because why not? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 07/08/2025 6:45 pm
Posts: 1748
Topic starter
 

Looks like my Roscoe 9 but with a rear shock. I want it!

https://imgur.com/a/bqHccWA


 
Posted : 08/08/2025 5:04 pm
Posts: 1748
Topic starter
 

I wonder if the Slash will be replaced with something more modular that combines it with the Session like new Orbea and Lapierre big bikes. Maybe a Session with swappable link or rear end? Or they might just drop if in favour of the Fuel LX.


 
Posted : 13/08/2025 8:52 pm
Posts: 2429
Full Member
 

I took it to Canada and was extremely impressed by it. It's a very capable descender that saw me going somewhat faster on unfamiliar trails than I normally would. The suspension felt really supple. I could not fault it in any way other than wanting to fit a smaller chainring and I would add a set of higher rise bars as I am a tall fellow and like a higher front end for long days out.

I can't say that I ever noticed the weight of it. It just rode really well.


 
Posted : 13/01/2026 11:25 am
Posts: 9543
Free Member
 

I borrowed one of these recently and was impressed. Too much bike for my local trails (and it had a Fox 38 on the front) but it pedalled and climbed impressively. Concentric pivot rear ends might be my favourite layout - best of both worlds for me as I prefer a good single pivot for pedalling feel and feedback.ย 


 
Posted : 13/01/2026 1:25 pm
Posts: 801
Free Member
 

You know Trek has really upped their game with their full sus bikes. They used to be an eye-sore with those rubbish knock-block non-sense, but now they are actually very sorted looking.

I do think they should stop pushing these hollow-boxes inside the frames though. They must add weight and they definitely add some manufacturing time.

If I'm going out for a short ride I can take a tool and some kit in my clothes, if it is a big ride I can take my bigger bag, if a medium ride I can take my small bag.

Having a box in there is like saying I have to carry a bag all the time. I can't see the issue with just putting some mounts on and you could bolt on a box like Canyon did a few years ago:


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 11:17 am
Posts: 801
Free Member
 

You know Trek has really upped their game with their full sus bikes. They used to be an eye-sore with those rubbish knock-block non-sense, but now they are actually very sorted looking.

I do think they should stop pushing these hollow-boxes inside the frames though. They must add weight and they definitely add some manufacturing time.

If I'm going out for a short ride I can take a tool and some kit in my clothes, if it is a big ride I can take my bigger bag, if a medium ride I can take my small bag.

Having a box in there is like saying I have to carry a bag all the time. I can't see the issue with just putting some mounts on and you could bolt on a box like Canyon did a few years ago:


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 11:17 am
Posts: 4248
Full Member
 

Can someone tell gravity that ride weight is better than real weight when dragging it up the hill


 
Posted : 14/01/2026 2:12 pm