Forum menu
Show me your lightw...
 

[Closed] Show me your lightweight XC speed machine

Posts: 36
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜› had to use sapim leader spokes as that was all that was in my spares bin.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 8:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bang on 20.....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 8:52 am
Posts: 4506
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]

22.5 lbs


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 9:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Scott Scale, bang on 20lbs.

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8380/8631256940_d8a0f47030.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8380/8631256940_d8a0f47030.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/22563264@N05/8631256940/ ]20120619_095600[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/22563264@N05/ ]yampydog[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 10:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How is there only 2.5lbs difference between a hardtail carbon Scott 29er with tubs, carbon rims, and XX, verses a FS Giant 26er with 3*9XT?

Stunning bike there Riverdog!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 10:41 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Stunning bike there Riverdog!

+1, that's lovely! Although you're penalised for taking photos of the non driveside of the bike!

What's the saddle? Is it a Becker?

No way is that 2lbs heavier than the Scalpel!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 10:53 am
Posts: 5689
Free Member
 

Some ludicrous weight claims on here ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 10:55 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I'm sure we've discussed that Anthem before!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 10:58 am
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Got a 20lb Soda. It's a bit to light. Fast thought. If I was not totally incompetent I'd post a picture.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:11 am
Posts: 25
Full Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

23lbs with pedals


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mrs Blobby's Anthem is over 2lbs heavier than that and it's the teeny tiny ladies size, very similar to that build and with lighter tyres.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Dunno what it weighs. Not a lot, probably less if it didn't have a flower pot built into the front rim.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Riverdog, that is very nice indeed. Why Rebas and not SIDs?


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:25 am
Posts: 4506
Full Member
 

Those Nics are only 2.1s and actually I can't remember if it had Nics or Ralphs on when I weighed it. Come and weigh it if you like ๐Ÿ™‚

Also, since it's last appearance it has lost a fair amount of weight.
SLR saddle (160g) replacing Bel Air (268g) -108g
KCNC rotors replacing Shimano -120g
KCNC ti skewers (47g the pair) replacing DT Swiss -90g

that's 3/4 of a pound just on those bits. It's also gone tubeless and now has a KCNC BB and seat QR.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That weight was before it went tubeless???? ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:29 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I'm assuming he's saying the 22.5lbs is as specced now, not as photographed? Ie it was 23.3lbs (ish) when photographed? I'm still struggling a bit, but I'm sure he's not making it up, so those desirable scales are out there somewhere!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Blimey, I wonder how light it would be without all those stem spacers? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:37 am
Posts: 172
Free Member
 

Haha, if that Anthem is 22.5 lbs then my SC Blur xc Carbon with full XTR / XO, Easton EC90, Syntace F109, tubeless RaRa Evo 2.1's on Roval Control SL's must be about 18 lbs on his scales... I'll take that! ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:37 am
Posts: 25
Full Member
 

The anthem really is that weight - I ride with him have seen/compared it myself.

Very impressive for a FS bike.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:46 am
Posts: 4506
Full Member
 

The 2009 Anthem X1 was 25lbs out of the box. Losing 2.5 lbs isn't a big ask.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The 2009 Anthem X1 was 25lbs out of the box.

Manufacturers claimed weight...? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thanks for the comments on my Scott.

Saddle is a Tune.

Why Rebas? They came new on the bike before it was upgraded, the budget wouldn't stretch to Tubs and new Sids. The wheels at 1200grms gave me more real benefits in terms of speed & stiffness than 200g saved on a fork upgrade.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 12:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Interesting. Was holding out for SIDs for a lightweight 29er build but I can find much better deals on the rebas, for the weight saving I may just go reba and spend the extra on wheels.

How have you found the tubs for XC racing?


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 1:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I need the DTSwiss Tubs in my life...Want


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And I thought my scales were optimistic. As long as I have a hole in my arse that anthem doesn't weigh 22.5 lbs. Not a prayer. It's running XT cranks for a start...

A 2011 Anthem X4 out the box is 'apparently' 28lbs. And I think that's probably on the generous side...


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 1:43 pm
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

Love all the "I saved X grams here" then quoting the final loss in pounds ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 1:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

RE: that anthem - Because I'm bored I looked at manufacturers given weights and for just the frame, fork, cranks, wheels, tyres and cassette it puts you at 22.5.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 2:00 pm
Posts: 1178
Full Member
 

It might not be 22.5 but it could easily be sub 23. I have an anthem with a similar spec which weighs in at sub 23lbs on a mate's digital scales.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 3:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Tubs are great for a race bike. I'm sure youre aware of the limitations when you don't have a Scott Swisspower support crew at your race, but the wheels are the revelation for me, they are silly light but the real advantage is they are so stiff. I have always found light 29er wheels floppy, but I think the deep carbon rims are what make the difference.
The tyres roll super fast but it takes some nerve to run them at 20psi. Goes like a cross bike on the fire roads and a soft-tail on the rough stuff. I did try TUFO tyres first, they roll just as fast, but the Dugasts have much more gripand are a bit bigger volume which I like better.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They fastbirds or rhinos?

Interesting comments re Tufo's as that seems to hold true when talking about their cross tubs as well. I think the extra grip comes from the more flexible sidewalls.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 3:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mine are Fastbirds.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sure this isn't you riverdog?
[img] [/img]

Pure class at this weekends XC season opener.


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 7:35 pm
Posts: 5689
Free Member
 

The picture is full of epic!!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 7:36 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Even cooler when you're winning a World Cup. Top bloke!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 7:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

18.4 lb a little disappointing.
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 8:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

disappointing

That ain't bad for non carbon rims and a full range of gears!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 8:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Niner AIR 9.

Dont know the weight but it's light enough.

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 8:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh I wish!!!
The look on those kids faces says it all!


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 8:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8406/8622511658_637ce95b46.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8406/8622511658_637ce95b46.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/10286353@N03/8622511658/ ]SDC12401[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/10286353@N03/ ]jcabuckley1974[/url], on Flickr

Under 22Lbs and raced this for the last 2 and a half seasons but building a 29er now so frame, fork and wheels will soon be available to buy.......


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 8:41 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

That ain't bad for non carbon rims and a full range of gears!

Agreed! Maxxlite 310s though? Loses points for non useable tyres ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 08/04/2013 11:30 pm
Posts: 4506
Full Member
 

I really don't know why I'm arguing with flange about this, but anyway...

I think he has a problem with his adding up. Here are some manufacturers quoted weights

Frame 2300
Wheels 1463
Forks 1498
Crankset 820
Cassette 280
Tyres 952
Stem 92
Bars 130
Bar ends 46
Seatpost 165
Skewers 44
Saddle 160
Rotors 146
QR 23
Grips 80
Brakes 650
Shifters inc inners 283

which add up to 9132g or 20.1lbs.
What's left - outers, headset, valves, Stan's fluid?


 
Posted : 09/04/2013 12:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's late so I could be wrong, but aren't you missing:

Front and rear Mechs
Chain
Pedals
Spacers
Rotor bolts?


 
Posted : 09/04/2013 12:24 am
Posts: 916
Free Member
 

I'm racing an onone whippet.
Not weighed it but fairly light
Built up with Rebas and American Classic wheels.
Most of other kit fairly middle of the road stuff
Frame is 1300g
http://www.industryimage.com/photo17672540.html


 
Posted : 09/04/2013 8:03 am
Posts: 4506
Full Member
 

remoterob, it was late but you weren't wrong.

Rear mech 181
Front mech 155
chain 290
rotor bolts 24g
spacers 10g

660g - total 9792, 21.5lbs


 
Posted : 09/04/2013 9:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Here's my 20" Whippet. 10KG/22LB as pictured in current 2x9 setup.

[IMG] [/IMG]

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 09/04/2013 3:27 pm
Page 3 / 5