Forum menu
Shortest chainstays...
 

[Closed] Shortest chainstays around

Posts: 1979
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Which bike has the shortest chainstays? of course there has to be rules. min 26er and measured from center BB to center of axle in most forward position (if applicable).
Pictures must be included to claim the phenomenal prize on offer but will take measurements at face value till the top few are decided.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 10:56 am
Posts: 3382
Full Member
 

Elevated chainstay Alpinestars used to be sub 16" -
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:03 am
Posts: 41830
Free Member
 

What Stevet1 said, a thankfully short lived fashion.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:14 am
Posts: 13862
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon - Member
What Stevet1 said, a thankfully short lived fashion.

Trek brought that back for the Stache, pretty much


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:16 am
Posts: 10979
Free Member
 

Shaggys Automatic 29er, a Rizla paper would struggle.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:19 am
Posts: 3824
Full Member
 

Despite being a 29+/29er/650+ bike, the Stache can run as short as 405mm (in 29er or 650+ guise), so still just under 16" in spite of the large wheel/tyres.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:36 am
Posts: 41830
Free Member
 

Trek brought that back for the Stache, pretty much
I meant the chainstay length, not elevated stays.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:39 am
Posts: 10979
Free Member
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

I think the Fisher Montare was even shorter than the Alpinestars

[img] [/img]

15.5" I believe


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:54 am
Posts: 3356
Full Member
 

Ozone Oxygen back in the early 90's used to have sub 16" stays with a machined chainstay yoke.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:55 am
Posts: 234
Free Member
 

As you only state 26inch minimum and no reference to type of bike, this is a BT ninja 365 trials bike, the chainstays are 365mm, although it did run a slightly wider BB to enable it to accomadate 2.5inch tyres:

[img] [/img]

Most 26inch trials bikes now sit around the 375 - 380mm chainstay length whilst using standard 68mm BB shells and are able to accomadate 2.5inch tyres comfortably.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 11:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
394mm (15.5") on a 29er with clearance for proper tyres.Gotta love Walt.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

without committing to the ugly stick* sub 16" with a standard width BB shell and clearance for a 26x2.35 tyre is easily do-able.
Sub 15.25" means compromises to aesthetics are required somewhere to allow for tyre clearance.

*ie. using a continuous straight seattube, useable seat tube angle and chainstays attached to BB shell.


 
Posted : 29/10/2015 2:27 pm
Posts: 3645
Full Member
 

My first 29er frame will go shorter than Walt's.

Photo shows 15.9". Tyre fully forward is 1/4" from touching bb shell so pretty much the practical limit without some weird custom drivetrain / treadle cranks. I've actually seen a very nice treadle powered custom folding bike on the streets of Bristol - I grabbed some spy photos but don't want to post in case he had plans for patents - and I want that prize ๐Ÿ™‚

Before anyone comments, effective seat tube angle is about 72 degrees.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

Shaggy's is very nice, but chainstays aren't necessarily short just because tyre is close to a straight seat tube. The gap between tyre and bb shell tells the truth.

16" is also close to the practical limit for a 1x9 / 1x10 drivetrain - much shorter and the chain is awfully strained / gears can start complaining at the outer extremes.


 
Posted : 30/10/2015 11:25 pm