Pimp ass pedals fro...
 

MegaSack DRAW - 6pm Christmas Eve - LIVE on our YouTube Channel

[Closed] Pimp ass pedals from canfield

44 Posts
21 Users
0 Reactions
98 Views
Posts: 42
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just cruising the websites as you do and stumbled upon these

[url= http://www.progressive-bikes.co.uk/canfield.html ]crampons[/url]

I'd heard of the canfield bikes before, but not their pedals

they look crazy. Anybody had any dealings with these pedals, how do they compare to Crank Bros 50/50 (my last flat pedals) for grip etc?

Apparently there's also a limited offer of 10% off for STW'ers quoting STW.


 
Posted : 13/07/2010 2:43 pm
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

I don't know about the Canfields, but i've had freebie plastic pedals that are grippier than standard-pin 50:50s.


 
Posted : 13/07/2010 2:46 pm
Posts: 41688
Free Member
 

A set went s/h on the classifides not long ago.

Not sure about the convex shape though, when everyone else has seteled on the concave shape.


 
Posted : 13/07/2010 2:50 pm
Posts: 42
Free Member
Topic starter
 

true I ended up putting the longer pins plus the short ones in for some grip


 
Posted : 13/07/2010 2:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's true, Canfield now available courtesy of your friendly bike distributor Progressive bikes!

Anyone who fancies the crampons let me know and you will get a nice 10% discount 🙂


 
Posted : 13/07/2010 6:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a pair and like them a lot. So much so that I find myself preferring them to the clipless pedals I've been using for years

Not found the convex shape a problem


 
Posted : 13/07/2010 11:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

how can you push through at the bottom of the pedal stroke on a platform pedal? on any pedal for that matter! clipped in, you would be pulling at the bottom.
so how can this design make it a more efficient pedal? its late and i am too tired to look further than my nose right now so feel free to make me look stupid here..


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 12:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sweet ass looking pedals right there. gotta get me some of those. My head seems to be able to get the convex shape, I cant explain why though. Maybe looks are everything...


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 12:19 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

convex shape makes sense to me


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 1:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The fact that your foot is so close to the axle means when at the bottom of the stroke you can wrap your foot around the pedal
more enabling you to keep contact with the pedal stroke longer, or something like that 🙂


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 7:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also, the latest pedals don't have as much bulge near the inner side of the pedal axle, which used to annoy some.


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 7:11 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Bought the pair off here a few months back. Didn't get on with them as just didn't seem to have the same control as with my Straitlines. Sold them to a mate and got a pair of Podiums. He's now sold them too, and bought Podiums as well. For my money, Podiums are much better for grip and control, up there with the Straitlines but slimmer and lighter.


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 7:12 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

i can see it for more reasons than that si


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 9:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's the reason I said 'something like that' cos in sure there is more to it, I just don't understand it 🙂


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 9:51 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

🙂
i reckon stiff soled shoes may rock about on them though.


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 9:53 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

convex shape makes no sense to me


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 9:55 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

convex fits into the arch of your foot and gives easier foot rotation .
in my mind it works. will have to try a set maybe to check. but certainly it fits with me.


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 9:58 am
Posts: 41688
Free Member
 

Hmm, I ride with my foot in about the same position as I would with SPD's, anything else gives me cramp and just feels wrong (this may be more to do with being used to doing this though) so the convex shape of flat pedals is cupping the concave shape of my foot at that point.


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:03 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

your feet should NOT be in the same place as spds


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why, Mr Jedi?


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Even for long distance riding?


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:11 am
Posts: 11622
Full Member
 

Oof! Flying in the face of conventional wisdom/experience there Jedi!

SPDs place the ball of your foot over the pedal axles, for the same riding on flats, why would you want it any different?


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:13 am
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

SPDs place the ball of your foot over the pedal axles, for the same riding on flats, why would you want it any different?

because your feet will fall off.

on flatties, for grip in technical terrain, I'd have thought pedal axle should be in line with arch of foot.

Last time I used flatties though, I fell off and broke my collarbone 🙂


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:18 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

because when your brain thinks you are in the air (drop/jump and even sometimes just front wheel unweights) yourfeet always point down, thus kicking the pedals away from your feet. that's why your feet slip pedals.

hows convention now? 🙂


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I see. Pretty rubbish for pedalling though?


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:26 am
 jedi
Posts: 10238
Full Member
 

er no!


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why would it be bad for pedalling?


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:33 am
Posts: 34069
Full Member
 

but are they any better than these
[img] [/img]
which i got a few weeks ago on offer at 33 quid?


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:41 am
Posts: 11622
Full Member
 

Convention is doing me fine thanks Jedi, I could understand using the arch of the foot if you're anticipating big hits, but otherwise it seems like a good way to reduce sensitivity and feel.

The OP's Canfields aside, why else would pedal manufacturers make the pedal concave, to fit the natural er... arch of the arch of your foot?

(actually, I'm just going to pre-emptively accept I'm wrong, I haven't ridden flats in years, obviously the technique has changed since then...)


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Less efficient?

I've got these pedals and with a thin pair of trainers I was flying along at the weekend! But with the ball of your foot on the axle, the convex shape means your foot does roll a little bit.

I might try the arch of my foot on the axle, if dhing with my fivetens. I can see it would help you push through the axle. But last advice I got for dh was to put your feet normally, and keep your heels down.


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 10:51 am
Posts: 8672
Full Member
 

Biomac shoes are interesting to :p
http://www2.trainingbible.com/joesblog/2007/02/biomac-shoes.html
http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=/tech/2009/reviews/biomac_bio-mxc2shoes09

I always setup my road and MTB shoes to have the cleat as far back as possible now (rather than over the ball of your foot), feels better IMO once you get used to it.


 
Posted : 14/07/2010 11:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

with racing bmx as a kid and using flat pedals for about the first 22 years of biking i remember riding on the arches of my feet.

having moved onto spds from that point onwards and then using both flat pedals and spds up until this day.. i have found that i now race on flats using the ball of the foot at a bmx track.I start off placing the foot over the axle on the gate definately with the ball over the axle.if a foot comes off then it would probably get throw back on closer to the arch but with what im aware of.. nowhere near bang on over the arch like when i was a kid.

i like the feel of first straight sprints on the ball of the foot over the axle on flat pedals. it feels like you can wrap the foot at the lowest point of the stroke to aid the upstroke.this feels crap when you try it on the arches.. probably because the amount of movement between the ankles pivot point(?!) to the axle under the arch.. in comparison to the ankle pivot point to the ball of the foot is quite a diffrence in such a short distance.

try this: place yer index finger across the arch of the foot and move the ankle up and down thru its limits..

now try it with the finger over the ball of the foot and work the ankle. see how much more scope you have?

you were given ankles.. use them!


 
Posted : 16/07/2010 11:43 pm
Posts: 84
Full Member
 

I thought conventional wisdom was arch of the foot over the axle for flats? Common knowledge no?
Anyway i have the crampons but if im honest I cant really tell the difference between any of the major brands of pedals there all as grippy as each other even with pins missing. The crampons do however have about a million pins per pedal and there very narrow and sharp so watch out for your shins if you get some. Do like the thinness of them though, looks good, which is what's really important


 
Posted : 17/07/2010 12:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have never used SPDs... always flats in 30 odd years of riding.. I ride with the ball of my foot over the axle like I was taught to by my old man.. It works for me although sometimes in the air or over rough stuff I do have to make adjustments.. but that's intuitive and I don't notice it happen..

I was out riding the other day on some new flats that I haven't used before... (Wellgo Mags) and I noticed that under certain pedalling conditions where a lot of weight is on the pedals my foot was defintitely curling round the edges of the pedal... obviously creating a convex shape at the soul of my foot..

So I think even in the SPD position your foot is concave.. thus making a convex shaped pedal more anatomically correct..


 
Posted : 17/07/2010 7:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

^ agrees with that first part.i wont get into the other part of it.never tried both convex/concave back to back so i wont bother! :O)


 
Posted : 17/07/2010 11:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

New Canfield pedals now in stock, in two new colours too!

18 bikes shouldn have some stock soon or buy from here 🙂 [url] http://www.progressive-bikes.co.uk/canfield.html [/url]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oooh you cheeky canfield bros....that gold would look crazy on my remedy

What's different, thicker? Still got to fit all the fuggin pins yourself?!


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

very nice Si, I'm using Outlands at the moment and they are fantastic, always fancied a set of canfields though 🙂


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pins have a stop now to they don't go all the way through. Slight change to inner pedal shape buy still as thin as before.


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ta, cheers. 2 lots of threadlock still haven't stopped a few pins coming loose on mine.

Looks like those little pyramids would stop the infernal squeak I get when I use my new fivetens...


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:23 am
Posts: 129
Free Member
 

Fuzzywuzzy
Biomacs are interesting.........but 500 euros for a pair of shoes 😯

The Canfields are lovely, as they should be for that price!


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:29 am
Posts: 4229
Free Member
 

Thing is, i just can't spending *that much* on something that is going to spend it's life getting battered into rocks, and will still break just like any other pedal. To me, pedals are essentially a consumable item like tyres.

The £50 Wahwahs I've got, are about as much as I can justify spending on a flat pedal. They're decently thin, pretty damn grippy and have survived 2 years so far, although one has got a mildly bent axle.

Is paying 2.5x as much really going to work or last 2.5 times better/as long?


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the thinness and sheer surface area of the crampons were a big plus to me, but then I used xmas money so classed them as a treat 🙂

Yes they get battered, but when out of the saddle they are 50% of your contact points, and they revolve many times, so design is important.


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if the pedals are worth the premium (and they are not the most expensive pedals on the market) is relevant to yourself.

Chris Canfield says that the pedals are more efficient by allowing you to lean back and push through the normal “dead spots” at the top and bottom of your pedal stroke. I have recently been using the pedals and they certainly feel more like an SPD type pedal at the bottom and top of the pedal stroke.

He also says that the platform also allows for more balance and stability because you are standing on the side of the spindles instead of the top.

Chris and Lance both race DH so know what they want from a pedal and seem to have come up with something uniquely different.


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just found out i will be getting some in ano grey colour too, sweet!


 
Posted : 17/08/2010 4:31 pm