Pace 405, am I comm...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Pace 405, am I committing to 2 obsolete technologies?

12 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
47 Views
 FOG
Posts: 2992
Full Member
Topic starter
 

My search for a new 26" frame continues after a 2nd hand purchase fell through . I noticed Pace still have a few 405 frames for sale new. I really liked the look of them back in the day but am wondering if the design is just too old and I should hang on for a better second hand 26er? And yes I know about Pace's reputation.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 2:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had one and the seat tube cracked


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 2:50 pm
Posts: 370
Full Member
 

just put my well used large frame in the classifieds !!!!!


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 2:52 pm
Posts: 8826
Free Member
 

Once when riding with BWD of these parts, I'm sure he said he had one with a slackset etc fitted and it was a bit of a weapon. To the point it stuck in my mind when I was frame shopping last year and I was very tempted but went with a Five instead.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had one. It didn't crack and I bloody loved it until it was nicked. Was slightly too short (my fault for buying a medium not a large) but the suspension was great, especially climbing.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 3:00 pm
Posts: 646
Full Member
 

It was great until I chainsucked a whole intto the frame. Going 1x10 would cure that problem.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 3:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For that money, why not get a Nukeproof Mega TR brand new? Old wheelsize, but modern everything else.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 3:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Didn't get on with mine, certainly wasn't a 5 star bike as all the reviews said. Paint quality was rubbish as well. Looked cool though.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 3:41 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

Salsa a la carte?


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 3:56 pm
Posts: 926
Free Member
 

I've got one, it's very very nice. Perhaps a bit heavy though.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 4:07 pm
Posts: 1197
Full Member
 

I used to really enjoy riding mine.

[url= https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5500/14542700232_ac103d453a_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5500/14542700232_ac103d453a_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/oa697U ]IMG_1263[/url]


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 4:08 pm
Posts: 11394
Full Member
 

I had one, liked it lots at the time, got Ragleyfied, started to find it a bit twitchy. Stuck a slack-set on it - as DBW says - which improved it, but never quite felt right, so I ended up selling it. Bought a Blur 4x off eBay while my Ragley Ti was being fixed under warranty and it's a better frame for what I do with it.

I thought it made a nice all-round trail bike, but I have to admit that I don't really miss it and I've come to prefer a slacker head angle. On the plus side it has a 44mm headtube, so you can use tapered steerer forks but I found anything more than 140mm made it a bit wandery on the climbs. And yes, it's a little on the heavy side, from memory the actual weight was a little more than Pace said on the spec.

Depends what you're looking for I guess.


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the more 26" bikes you buy the less obsolete they become


 
Posted : 30/06/2014 4:48 pm