[Closed] On one fatty first impressions (anyone)

You surely don't expect folk to actually ride those things?

I thought fatbikes were just bought by people that don't actualy ride.

oh

If I'd realised that, I'd have pre-ordered 🙁

Not for sand, so I've heard.

Understated launch, not seen many reviews. Given on one couldn't be bothered to respond to my emails "I'm out"

[quote=Mantastic ]Understated launch, not seen many reviews. Given on one couldn't be bothered to respond to my emails "I'm out"
AFAIK, they all sold out before arriving so I'm not sure that any "launch" was worthwhile. I expect there to be some magazine review in time for the next lot of orders? The weather has been shit all week - and it's dark at nights. Maybe those that got them haven't had a chance to ride them yet.

Still - looks like the Mukluk is actually a better deal anyway. Lighter, better quality parts, higher spec gearing and a proven design.

They were pretty good answering my couple of queries tbh

Tempted as a ctw option but can't do that til march

Calling

(anyone)

Its a very different riding experience.
I got one for technical off piste climbing/techy slow descents + exploring some of the sandy rocky stuff locally and riding places it was otherwise be impossible/pointless to. I also wanted it to the winter filthbike niche left by having to get rid of my singlespeed.

It appears to do all of this stuff well. Being able to ride crazy off camber rock, pebble/scree and squeeze traction out of anything is a proper hoot. Handling is great, doesn't feel slow + sluggish like the Pug I tried a few years ago. Bit like a 29er in that it takes a bit to get it wound up to speed, but it holds it very well. Wheelies, manuals and jumps pretty well, until it comes to landing... Had a few moments going faster than was wise down steps + off a couple of rocky drops when I had to remember that it was an un-dampened rigid bike. I think you could probably hurt yourself going crazy fast on trail centre descents, but for me this is the opposite of a trail centre bike. Seems way better at coping with mud (upland peaty, don't have much clay here) than a cross bike.

Theres some very experienced fat-bikers on here who can give you more informed opinions.
This'll make me go riding when I might not otherwise and explore where I wouldn't have.

Mal
Would you say it was a sit and grind bike or one that you can stand and mosh up hills

Druidh, contacted them 9 months ago about some ideas and met some of them at Malvern- no response to emails is just rude.

Pop. I've done both. Slightly limited by the 1 x 10 set up. I think with a double up front you'd be able to sit, grind + thrutch your way up some crazy stuff.

Is 32 lb about typical for a fatty these days, or is that light?
I'm a bit behind the times - weren't the first ones properly heavy, like well over 40?

By all accounts the 32lbs quotes were a little ambitious- closer to 35-36 is what I've read

Lots of Fatbikes are now getting sub-30lbs these days. My 9:zero:7 is about 31lbs and there's nowt special about that build.

I'll stay out of commenting on the ride, other than, I've been waiting to here about what other people think about how they ride and everyone just talks about the weight. FWIW the 32lb people keep quoting was the weight of the pre-production small build that On-One had. Production is a bit higher as the spec is a bit different. You can buy lighter bikes for a grand, but for a fat bike, especially one with chunky tyres, I think it is pretty good.

My first impression is that its taking forever to get here! Fedex had a Dec 22 delivery date since it was shipped; it just changed to the 26th! 🙁

FWIW It seems like great VFM. Parts'll get upgraded as they wear, + rims'll probably get drilled at some point but all the essential kit appears to be good. Right off to ride it into the teeth of a howling southwesterly in the pssing rain.

We raced the pre production On One at Oktoberfest alongside 2 Pugs. It did everything very well. It climbed happily, it descended the rocky section quickly. Nothing fell off, including us. This was on the man made trails and I love it, it adds another dimension.

Mantastic/anyone...

If you use the word "brant" in any of your emails to on one, I get a copy automagically.

Happy to hear your thoughts. Sorry if you have had no response to date.

Brant.

Is there a bead lock on your rims?

Have you attempted to tubless them yet?

When will they be available to buy?

stu - what's a bead lock look like?

I assume there's an extra "lip" on the inside (?) of the bead seat? My salsa rims are expressly not to be used with tubeless set ups ( I assume that applies to ghetto) so I assume something like a Stans rim has a minor but technically important difference in its profile to be able to keep a bead sat more securely?

I've only put around 40km on mine so far, but have had a whole pile of fun on it. I bought it as something a bit out of the ordinary and to act as a simple(r) bike for winter riding. It's my first fat-bike, so the first thing I noticed was the vastly different weight distribution to a normal bike. The Fatty has most of its weight in the wheels which seems like it gives a low centre of gravity and makes for a very stable ride.

As mentioned above the monster truck wheels need a bit of work to get them up to speed, but once there it flows the trails very well and seems to be able to hold a line in the corners very nicely. With all that rotating weight it does seem to need quite a lot of input to get it to turn in, but just throw your weight into the corner and it's all good. In boggy trail conditions the huge tyres did a great job of floating over the gunk and holding the speed.

It took me a while to get used to riding full-rigid off rode again after 7 years of riding full-suspension but you soon learn to loosen up and let the bike do its thing. I'm rather enjoying the simplicity of the 1x10 gearing. It's a bit of a grind on the hills, but my theory is that it will help be build fitness over the dark months.

Overall I'm very happy and glad I bought it.

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8079/8296916238_cc067bc788.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8079/8296916238_cc067bc788.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/egg_n_bacon/8296916238/ ]Fatty![/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/egg_n_bacon/ ]jwrfooo[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8080/8296919788_7ba3e0374c.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8080/8296919788_7ba3e0374c.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/egg_n_bacon/8296919788/ ]Fatty![/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/egg_n_bacon/ ]jwrfooo[/url], on Flickr

I keep talking myself out of wanting one but then these threads come along and get the wanting nerve all a jangle again

Stoner - Member

stu - what's a bead lock look like?

You pretty much have it - the tyre bead squeezes onto a step by the rim sidewall, rather than being gripped by the hook on the sidewall.

Brant.
Is there a bead lock on your rims?
Have you attempted to tubless them yet?
When will they be available to buy?

Shaggy knows. He'll be here soon.
Will get sorted in new year ordering spares. Drilled rims and wheelsets etc.
So April.

Ta.

this is apprentely a stans rim cross section - tubeless happy
[img] [/img]

and this is a salsa gordo - tubeless sad
[img] [/img]

I dont get the difference?>

and I'd like a SS frame only option please Santa / Brant........

Stoner.

There are a few people who have tooblessed the Gordo.

I think Salsa are just covering their own arses.

You can get most things to work with a bit of trial and error.

This has been running for ages toobless with 6psi in it.

(flaps now trimmed off) 😉

[url= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7219/7090784141_a29acdfe47_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7219/7090784141_a29acdfe47_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/stu-b/7090784141/ ]tubeless Nate on Large Marge.[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/stu-b/ ]singlespeedstu[/url], on Flickr

Slsa are probably covering their ass...but the step on the stans rims makes tubeless tyres a tight fit, so it must be accurate/a tight tolerance.

I tubelessed a Gordo Stoner and ran it for quite a while with no issues(Kenda Nev)

25mm Fibreglas strapping tape, stans valve and away you go 🙂

The fatty is a great deal but the lack of a granny put me off. I've ridden SS, 1x9, 1x10 for years now on my 'normal' bikes but find I use the granny on my Mukluk a lot.
Not that a hugely big deal, but the quoted weights floating around for the fatty look like they were a touch ambitious 😉 Easy enough to knock some off though. I lost a pound and a half of rotating weight from my Muk the other day just by tubelessing it.
It was done for performance reasons rather than weightweenieness but the weight loss is welcome nonetheless.

Q: I'm currently running a 29er steel frame rigid, with a 2.35 Hans Dampf on the front. How would the fattie differ? Just tyre contact patch and pressure?

On the flip side my bike (SS) is coming in at the 22lb mark. When I stand on the pedals, it goes. We're talking about another 10 pounds or more for a geared fattie it looks.

[quote=mattjg ]Q: I'm currently running a 29er steel frame rigid, with a 2.35 Hans Dampf on the front. How would the fattie differ? Just tyre contact patch and pressure?
Pretty much, yes.

Pretty much, yes.

Yeah. An important variable tho.

I remain fairly fattie/Krumpus curious, would love a go on one for our (currently very soggy) XC and trail riding.

I ride a pugsley or moonlander in the forests of UK. With the right tyres (nates) these things excel in the mud. Looking forward to the delivery of the new moonlander mud tyres (bud and Lou) Charlie the bikemonger getting some in soon, although they may all be pre-orders. Through the summer, riding with endomorph and larry's instead of nates, is superb. Your only pain is getting your tyre pressures correct, once correct you just clatter of anything in your way. Forget worrying about the correct line, just ride over it.

I have ventured to the beach a number of times which is great fun.

So in summary, fat is superb in the forests. Just get your tyre selection sorted.

druidh - Member

mattjg » Q: I'm currently running a 29er steel frame rigid, with a 2.35 Hans Dampf on the front. How would the fattie differ? Just tyre contact patch and pressure?

Pretty much, yes.

This is sarcasm, yes? Huge difference.

No.

I was referring to druid's post, not yours.

The rims don't have a real bead lock but the fit is better than some others. I haven't tried these tubeless. Mainly because when I have done it on other fat wheels it's been less reliable than tubes and weighed more.

cheers on the tubeless/salsa/gordo tips guys.

Having made some crests/rocket rons tubeless I fancy having a go on my "main" front wheel - Gordo + 2.4" RR. 61mm of low pressure fatness 🙂
I think I'll take a stab at it.

Mine Just arrived!!! 2 huge boxes.

Fedex delevered it today, even thought they updated the expected delivery date to Dec 26 late last night. They done good! 😀

So I was a little premature with my "taking forever" post above. 😳

Fat bike, fat box(es)....... 😉

So, still unboxing and weighing stuff, but here's my thoughts:

- The tires are HUGE! The tread is HUGE! Mine weigh 1444g and 1516g.
- I like the skewers. Levers look neat and the machined aluminum nut with the captured spring is a really nice touch. F 58g, R 59g
- Tubes weigh 593g each. If the orange decals weren't bad enough, the valve caps are orange as well! 😀
- Front wheel 1722g w/ rotor & rim tape, w/o skewer.
- Rear wheel 2293g w/ rotor & rim tape & cassette, w/o skewer. 30 pt freehub engagement = 12 degrees.
- Rims are pinned, not welded (not a worry to me). I'm concerned that the profile of the rim bead seat might make it tough to go tubeless, as the shelf isn't very wide.

More to follow...

keep going Joe. Oh, and pics, or it isnt happening!

Ooh excited for you joe- we need photos

Looks like real weight saving on tubes to be had with a DH tube

Update #1

Well, I already had to make a trip to the LBS. The socket type Park BB tool I had won't fit the Howitzer BB as the spindle is in the way. 😳 LBS was nice enough to lend me a wrench type one. The crank and BB that come on the bike are massive. They could handle the fattest of the fat IMO!

And by some miracle, the Race Face Evolve 24-36-bash crankset fits!!!

But there is only one mm of clearance between the chainring and the chainstay! 😯 So I need a 34. But I don't see 34s on the Race Face website! 🙄 So, asked LBS to look into and order one if possible. Comment on [url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/how-much-chainring-to-chainstay-clearance-do-i-need?replies=1#post-4494238 ]this thread[/url] if you'd like to.

More weights:
- Big Nose Saddle 290g. I wonder why they called it that. It looks kinda odd to me. The front part of it is much wider than my regular saddle. 😉 Saddle shell says Velo, the mfr I guess.
- Twelfty seatpost 282 grams. 31.6x 350. Wondering who the little cartoon guy on the back of it is supposed to be. Customer? Designer?
- Cassette 391 g SRAM 11-36
- QR seat clamp 37g.
- Howitzer BB 430 g.
- Truvativ Holzfeller crank (170 mm, 32T) 687 g.

Only issue so far is that there was not a chaingiude on the bike as per the specs. Its not a big deal to me as I am going 2x anyhow.

I will post photos of the complete bike, but the garage is not lit well and is a complete mess. And I know the response that a messy garage would get on STW!

Any bets on whether another LBS trip will be needed today or not? 😐

Joe. Did your bike come from the US store, or the UK?

Brant - Thanks. Mine is from the US location in Portland, OR.

Update #2

IIRC, the website said that the bike was supposed to come with white bars. My bars are black, and I'm glad! However, the gold print on the bar looks out of place with the rest of the bike as there is no other gold anywhere. Oh, and these bars are 30 inches wide! 😯 My regular bike is 26.5 inches wide. There are some real narrow gaps between trees where I ride, so if I like the wide bars, I may have to go cut down some trees! 😀

As far as headset concerns expressed by someone, I took the fork off, and the headset bearings were nice and smooth. The cups were greased when put into the frame as there were gobs of red grease squeezed out around them. I couldn't figure out how to get the bearings out of the cups, though. 😳 I didn't try sharp tools or a hammer, though because I wanted to keep the seals intact. 😉 So I just added a little grease to the top and bottom of the cartridge bearing and reassembled things. On-one provided a 5, 15, 15, and 20 mm spacer on the steerer.

More weights:
- Stem 145 g, 31.8x60 mm. Looks nice. The steel steerer tube is exposed at the rear of the stem, so I need to figure out how to stop it from rusting.
- Fork 1300 g with ginormous crown race attached
- Ancho bar, 316 g, 30" wide
- Grips 124 g w/ plugs. I will put Ergon grips on mine, but keep these around.
- Front brake - 333 g with 34" brake line
- Headset spacers (5,10, 15, 20 mm) 21 grams

Now I'm getting hungry. I don't think that I've eaten anything all day, which is not normal. More to follow...

Try it before you cut down the bars. I always change cockpit setups but after getting the height right haven't touched this. Rides very well + the extra leverage is great for thruch moves.
Improvised some mudguards after getting properly soaked riding in the permapuddle filth.

Mal-ec - Yes, I'm going to try the bars as the designer intended me to; 30" wide! 😯 And I never mentioned cutting the bars; I said that I would cut down trees if I had to! 🙂

Update #3

Question - is it humanly possible to remove a non-removable (black) SRAM 10 speed powerlink from a chain? I've used the 8 speed (removable) ones forever and love them. I spent a embarrassing amount of time trying to get this 10 speed one undone. Bare hands, needle nosed pliers, etc. And both LBS close at 6 on Saturday! So the second LBS trip of the day was not possible. Grrr! Then, finally I figured out the answer:
[img] [/img]
Luckily, I already bought a 6 pack of KMC reusable 10 speed ones off of Amazon! Whew! 😉

Then I notice, there is no derailleur hanger on the frame! 😯 WTF! Panic; look through boxes, etc. Oh no, I won't be able to do anything till next week! Run around, curse, etc. 😥 And as above, LBS closed till tomorrow. Then, I notice that it is still attached to the rear derailleur that I had already removed from the bike as I'm going to put on a Shimano one. 😳 Disaster averted.

The frame was masked where the derailleur hanger attaches to the bike, so its not painted there. There was a bit of paint that squeaked in under the rear edge of the mask, though and it was really thick. Enough to cause the hanger to be misaligned? I dunno, but it was easy to scrape off with a razor blade.

And I found that I needed to run the front brake line in a different way than I've ever done before. It seems to route well when its right beneath where the head tube and down tube join. If I put it out in front of the head tube, it was much too long and twisted around all weird. I don't have a bleed kit for DOT brakes, so shortening the hose isn't possible for me right now.

So, stay tuned for another exciting chapter of [i]Joe Builds a bike.[/i]

Update #4

What others have said about the tire beads being loose is true. You know how you can usually use a tire lever to sweep the tire bead onto the rim when they're not too tight? I was able to use my finger instead of a tire lever, that's how loose they were. 😯 It does make it easy to align the tire logo with the valve stem, though! 🙂 And when I got the tire mounted and started pumping it up, I think that it took 5 psi or so before the tube contacted the tire tread. Before that, I could feel space between the tire and the inflating tube with my hand on the tread area. I do realize that the pump gauge isn't real accurate at this low of a pressure.

BIG PROBLEM! ❗ The hub logo is not visible through the valve hole, FFS!* 🙁 Isn't the wheelbuilder aware of this rule? Do you know how expensive it will be for me to have the wheel rebuilt to align said logo and hole?

Both tires have a noticable "hop" (to use the wheel truing term) to them when mounted on the bike and and spun. The bead is seated fine as far as I can tell. I ran them up to 20 psi, the max on the sidewall, and will leave them overnight. Maybe they're still a little stiff from being folded up for who knows how long since they were made.

I also noticed that the seam on the rims is at a bit of an angle; it is not parallel to the hub axle. I never noticed this on other wheels, but I never really looked, either. My guess is that at least some other wheels are like this too, but that the width of the rims makes it more noticeable. It is not a concern to me at all, just pointing it out.

There are no logos or stickers on the rim. IMO, it needs at least a little something to dress it up. And the rim needs a name, like the Surly and Vicious ones, too. On-One names everything else that they make, why not the rims?

Oh, and the plastic trim pieces underneath the saddle aren't held on with regular phillips or slotted screws; they use a hex key. No real value, but it does look really nice.

I also discovered that it is absolutely impossible to mount a disc wheel when the brake caliper still has the little plastic travel block between the brake pads. 😳 Front wheel or rear wheel, it doesn't matter. Its amazing how easy they go in after it is removed, though. 🙂 Why on earth did Avid make them out of black plastic? They should be a bright color so that you notice them. Its kinda hard to notice a black plastic block in a black brake caliper. Magura uses yellow, which you can actually see.

The brakes drag ever so slightly as well. I loosened the tri-align bolts, squeezed the levers, and tightened the bolts again while holding the levers. I did this 2 or 3 times and its still the same. There is not enough drag to slow the wheel (they spin forever) but I can just hear a little rub. Hopefully this will go away once the pads bed in.

I got one of those Problem Solvers direct mount adapters to mount my front derailleur on. It attached to the seat tube in the area where it is bent. The seat tube is not perfectly round at this spot; I've tightened the clamp but can still see daylight between the front of the clamp and the seat tube. I bet that at least a gram of dirt will accumulate there adding unnecessary weight to the bike! 😉

I'm tired and going brain dead. i can't make sense of how to attach the cable to the front derailleur. So, tomorrow will be cable time. Front derailleur, rear derailleur, KS Lev dropper seatpost.

To be continued.

* I may or may not not give a sh1t about this at all...

Come on JoeG get the bloody camera going we want pics too please 😉

Pictures needed, you would have been able to undo a ten speed power link with mastelink pliers and probably re use it, fair play with a dremel! There seems to be a lot more information coming to light from customers on this bike now on both here and mtbr. Some similar issues amongst them too. Perhaps it's been a little rushed this project and launch of a bike. Then again how much is to be expected quality and weight wise with a day bike that's £999 when everything else is above this price point.

Tbh- nothing identified so far as made me think I wouldn't bother

Any component choices will always be a silt of budget but my view is that you would just replace with better quality as they wear out

There seems to be a lot more information coming to light from customers on this bike now on both here and mtbr. Some similar issues amongst them too. Perhaps it's been a little rushed this project and launch of a bike. Then again how much is to be expected quality and weight wise with a day bike that's £999 when everything else is above this price point.

I don't understand your point. I am not seeing issues.

I bet Brant loves answering emails from people like joe up there. 😆

Joe.

You sound like you should have gone to a bike shop and ordered a custom built bike and had them set it up for you as you seem incapable of doing it yourself.
Might have cost you a bit more than a grand though...

I took mine to Sherwood Pines yesterday. First job was to take it to the shop to get both brakes bled though 🙁 (I'd put <50 miles on it prior to this on flat bridle path stuff). The front cones were also loose, but I'd fixed that myself.

As others are noting, my 20" version is coming in at 36lb with M520s.

I'm used to a 20lb XC bike (Whippet), so it did take a while to get dialed in to the extra effort of the Fatty going up. The rewards were there on the descents and the vast traction going round the corners.

The Fatty feels much less skittish than the Whippet, so even though the conditions were truly horrible (puddles over the BB in a number of places) the extra confidence + massive grip from those tyres meant I was going faster in some places than I would in much drier conditions on the XC bike.

One of the sections is up through a peaty, densely wooded, stretch. Here the soil was pretty much washed away, leaving a rats nest of slippy roots. On those 4.0" tyres it rode just like a canal path 🙂

Now Sherwood is far from steep, but I found I was extensively using the lowest 3 gears. Personally I think a granny ring would be a good idea for anything much steeper. It just suits the bike's character IMHO to sit and plod your way up the hills on a moderate spin.

I will be replacing the brakes, though they do now stop thanks to the guys at Sherwood Pines. (XTs to match my other bikes so I can use common pads and bleed kits).

I will be going 2x10.

I might see what is reasonable to do weight-wise, but TBH it's not for racing, so I'll see how I get on by adding some gears first.

FWIW I did 2 laps of the Red, each of them just squeezed in under the hour. I guess the most important thing is though I had a great time.

Si

Wake up Joe we/I need some pictures I have the impression that you are enjoying faffing with fatty :wink:hope it is fettled up soon. By the way any pics?

Still - looks like the Mukluk is actually a better deal anyway. Lighter, better quality parts, higher spec gearing and a proven design.

I take it you don't mean buying from [url= http://www.damianharriscycles.co.uk/prod/har_0002_sb/Salsa/Mukluk ]HERE[/url] 😯

Loving Joe's stream-of-building-consciousness, keep it up.

Woody- loving the finance deal on that 😯

I'm back at it again, everyone.

As far as ple and pop's comments above, I have not come across anything so far that would stop me from recommending the Fatty to anyone. I'm quite pleased with it, actually. The only real structural change that I would lie to see would be better chainring clearance for up to a 36 middle ring. There is tons of tire clearance on the chainstays, so another 5 mm looks easily doable.

However, I have only tried the stock rims and tires. What looks like excessive clearance now might be just adequate with wider rims and or tires. And there is only so much room around the BB to put everything, so there will be compromises, especially on fat bikes. It looks like Brant leaned heavily toward tire and wheel clearance at the expense of the middle chainring. Some riders will agree, other will not. Its not a showstopper for me so far,

The bike brands have to balance consumer wishes against cost on every build. And fat bike parts like hubs and cranks are still a pretty small part of the market, so there aren't a lot of choices and the parts are costly. Shimano isn't in the fat bike market at all, and SRAM's offerings for cranks are their older Howitzer line. So my guess is that Brant chose to go with a single ring crank to save a few bucks. Maybe some of those bucks were put into the hydraulic disc brakes (instead of mechanical ones), 120 tpi tires, and such.

Some of the upgrades that I am making to my Fatty are just preference, as well. I prefer Shiman over SRAM, so I'm replacing the shifters and rear der and shifters.

I chose the Fatty over the Muk and Pugs that I could have got at a LBS because I thought I would like the Fatty's slacker head tube and higher BB. Also, the Muk and Pugs have 27.2 seat tubes; I went dropper this year and that really limits choices. And lots of people have Surly and Salsa fat bikes; few have On-Ones, at least in the US!

I almost had a heart attach when I first started working on the bike this AM. I spun the cranks w/o a chain, and heard a clicking sound like a rear freehub! 😯 WTF! Did it again, and again. Took a minute or two, but I found the cause. 🙂 It was that little plastic sticker that they put on there to help you align the front derailleur with the chainring. The sticker was hitting the chainring teeth making the clicky noise when I spun the cranks. 😳 In my defense, the sticker was hidden behind the bash ring so wasn't easy to see.

So, I figured out the front cable routing. I found out that I don't need to use the cable stop that is on the frame seat tube. So, pretty close on that, just need to fine tune the limit screws and cable tension.

Rear derailleur won't go onto the largest cog, though. I'll recheck the limit screws, cable tension, etc. after I finish eating.

I put that rubber electrical tape on the chainstay to protect the paint. I've read about it, but never tried it myself. The tape is 1" wide, and it takes 2 widths to cover the top and inside of the chainstay. Unfortunately, the seam is right on the corner. So, I'll have to try and find some 2" wide if I'm happy with it.

Joe, I so would have been out on a few rides *before* all your fettling and improvements....Pics and a ride pleeeeease...

Let's face it.
Joe has spent his grand on a bike and couldn't afford a camera.

[b]The bike is COMPLETE!!![/b] 8)

[b]36 lbs, 15 oz. [/b] 😯

Going out to the park or somewhere to take some photos now. 🙂

I may not be able to ride today at all. :(The water is shut off. The municipal authority has had a crew at my neighbor's house since 10 this morning. They have a backhoe digging in the front yard.

Still not riden it joe.

Says a lot that does. 😆

^^
Ride it? Who buys a bike to ride it? 😆

No, I have not ridden it yet. My butt has never been on the saddle. 🙁

Just got back from taking some photos. So, should I upload the photos or go for a ride? 😉

I don't think anyone cares anymore.....

ignore that chunky grumpy bollocks, host the piccies then go for a spin.

lovin" the write up!

I'd like to see detailed pictures to show how many degrees the hub markings are out from the valve hole...

I'd also like a vid of the wheel builder laughing all the way to the bank when you ask him to rebuild the wheels.

I don't think anyone cares anymore.....

Aha, the old reverse psychology...

Handling is great, doesn't feel slow + sluggish like the Pug I tried a few years ago.

This is a more and more used quote i would love to see put into practice... 🙂

The bike
[img] [/img]

Rear wheel and drivetrain
[img] [/img]

Big Nose saddle and KS Lev dropper seatpost
[img] [/img]

Race Face Evolve crankset, Shimano XT front der
[img] [/img]

Front wheel and fork
[img] [/img]

Head on
[img] [/img]

Rear hub and brake caliper
[img] [/img]

Front brake caliper
[img] [/img]

The controls
[img] [/img]

Nondrive side
[img] [/img]

BB area showing tire chearance
[img] [/img]

Top tube(s)
[img] [/img]