Forum menu
As above, anybody know?
Once you start looking you've already bought it.................. 😉
[url] http://www.nukeproof.com/frames/mega-frame [/url]I guess the angles etc are based on 160mm forks?
except they wont be ready till summer if that doesn't go back
heckler top of the list so far
I suppose that would make sense as its for a 150 to 170 fork.
But i would like to know for sure.
Plus there's no rush. Only one wage coming in at the mo and the Hemlock ain't done nothing wrong 
The PDF states that "Geometry based on
558mm axel to crown", which corresponds to a 170mm fork with semi-integrated headset.
So with a 160mm fork it would be a little bit steeper and the BB would be even lower. I think the 13,7" is even low for a 170mm fork.
However I think a BB height relative to the axle measurement would be more helpful, because we don't know which tires were used to measure this.
Too bad that it's available in June, I'm also very interested in one.
I've just measured my Cotic at 14.2" with the forks at 160
And I've just ragged it round my local moor and I aint changing it 😉