Forum search & shortcuts

Nomad 4?
 

[Closed] Nomad 4?

Posts: 21027
 

I think this makes sense, if you already have a trail bike, such as a 5010 (i.e. Something that [i]could[/i] get you down a DH track, but not quickly or gracefully) but you want to not have to push a 40lb lump back up the hill. Or (like me) the speed at which you need to ride a proper dh sled to make it work (warp 9+) over the terrain said sleds are designed for scares the shit out of you. (My mk3 does this very well, so would replace that with it, but not if it was my only bike)

Wouldn't buy one to replace a selection of bikes though.


 
Posted : 01/06/2017 5:56 pm
 poah
Posts: 6494
Free Member
 

jonnym92 - Member

Anyone spotted the GX eagle on the US site too?? Interesting..

Click Nomad C and then the 's' build..

yes, on the first page lol


 
Posted : 01/06/2017 6:08 pm
Posts: 172
Free Member
 

I find it intriguing that SC are being quite clear in not advertising the N4 as their new Enduro race bike.

I suspect that their marketing will be quite different for the release of the new Hightower LT 29. This will likely have the EWS badge attached to it and a focus on out right Enduro race pace.


 
Posted : 01/06/2017 6:21 pm
Posts: 794
Free Member
 

I'm a fan of having the expensive slidey bits mounted good and high up (not a fan of inverted forks either!) rather than in the line of grime.

Inverted forks actually work really well in the slop - seals don't get crud building up on them, and they're out of the line of fire from shit flying off the tyres. More mud clearance too.

When an oil seal blows you'll know about it though!


 
Posted : 01/06/2017 6:21 pm
Posts: 3926
Full Member
 

It's a Santa Cruz. They are the latest clit bike, therefore they'll be all over the place within 12m. At least the don't look exactly the same as a Bronson or 5010 anymore.


 
Posted : 01/06/2017 7:09 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

teethgrinder - Member
It's a Santa Cruz. They are the latest clit bike, therefore they'll be all over the place within 12m.

Guaranteed to get the haters out?


 
Posted : 02/06/2017 1:07 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I was expecting this thread to be about the cost, and instead it's mostly full discussion about whether mountains exist, or are needed. 🙂

I sold on a Nomad mk 3 because it was too much for my middle-aged mincing. But I'm glad bikes like this are a thing. For anywhere without uplifts, a full-on DH bike seems like a bit of a curse.


 
Posted : 02/06/2017 3:03 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

yeah and for those of us outside the bubble...
It would be a blast
here
http://bluedirt.com.au/mtb-bookings/
here
http://maydenabikepark.com/the-trails/
here
https://www.vertigomtb.com.au/uplift-shuttles
be something to whinch up my local mountain, to haul up and down the lakes at times and many more places.

I was expecting this thread to be about the cost

Problem these days is the prices are on par with specialized...
I can see how a bunch of bike packing roadies don't get it though.


 
Posted : 02/06/2017 3:14 am
Posts: 1512
Free Member
 

I think it's an interesting idea and a fairly bold move from SC to not make the N4 squarely aimed at the enduro market, which would surely of led to greater sales of one on a their flagship bikes (that could be a very uk perspective though). Saying that SC always seem to like to try a break a bit of new ground when it comes bigger burly bikes - when I bought my N2 there wasn't really much else around widely available in of a 160 travel, do it all, take it anywhere, pedal it up hills bike - the competition was mainly heavy free ride bikes and the orange alpine 160 hadn't been realeased (there's now a slew of these bikes) - so I guess this is a natural progression of their ethos?

Will also be interested to see how different it actually is to ride and how much is marketing fluff. Other than moving the shock (which admittedly is a big change) and 20mm longer reach, it's not wildly different from the N3, so will the N4 actually stop being the all round enduro bike the N3 is? If the answer is no, I think you'll see a lot of them around and it's probably more of a strategy to differentiate the line up and widen the gap with the bronson. If yes, then like others, it would be a bit niche for my riding and I'd stick to my N3


 
Posted : 02/06/2017 6:50 am
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

Given the amount of capras I see at enduros, I can't see an extra 5mm at the back putting folks off.


 
Posted : 02/06/2017 7:20 am
Posts: 18233
Full Member
 

I think Josh and Loose kind of like it.


 
Posted : 02/06/2017 8:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

'Yes, yes, that's what I heard too... all big travel bikes are rubbish, dumb down the trails and take away the fun factor... we all should be riding short travel bikes'

[img] ?w=615[/img]


 
Posted : 08/06/2017 3:05 pm
Posts: 2795
Full Member
 

Well as times gone on so grown to like this more!! I'd love to ride one. I think it was pink bike or GMBN said it would be a great enduro bike for someone starting outracing and who didn't want to be out of their depth!!

Too rich for my blood though! SC tax is crazy!!!


 
Posted : 08/06/2017 4:24 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Worth a look at the Radon Swoop wookster, remarkably similar angles and also 170mm travel.


 
Posted : 08/06/2017 4:28 pm
Posts: 9081
Free Member
 

I think it looks awesome, totally on point bike for hucking and shredding.

Have you just time machine'd in from 1999 Canada?


 
Posted : 08/06/2017 5:03 pm
 Leku
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Cedric on one. I may have been partly responsible for the hangover on the last day.


 
Posted : 08/06/2017 5:42 pm
Posts: 2795
Full Member
 

Thanks Chakaping! But my inner chimp has his heart set on a Nicolai...not that I'd do either justice... 🙄


 
Posted : 08/06/2017 11:25 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

At least with the Nicolai you're getting something really different geometry-wise.


 
Posted : 09/06/2017 8:35 am
Page 3 / 3