New 2011 Boardman R...
 

[Closed] New 2011 Boardman Range

Posts: 11381
Free Member
Topic starter
 

http://www.boardmanbikes.com/


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:19 am
Posts: 6745
Free Member
 

I spent ages building my "perfect commuter" and now Boardman have released 3 of them in the form of those CX bikes! They've even got the rear disc in the right place


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:20 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

An 18.1lb cabon HT with carbon rims?

Well, that's the cheap and cheerful tag blown out of the water then!!

No price yet though...


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:24 am
Posts: 4167
Full Member
 

The full-suss bikes look interesting. At 130mm they look a lot more 'trail bikey' than the previous 100mm(?) ones. Need prices though...


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:36 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Very interesting direction. Lots of carbon, big wheels and loads more hardtails.

New FS bikes look nice. Need to make a 150mm or 160mm bike though!


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:43 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Boardman have released 3 of them in the form of those CX bikes! They've even got the rear disc in the right place

That's scuppered my plans on building a cross bike for this season. Might have to re-think my I-don't-need-discs-yet strategy....

Good work, CB.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm a sucker for internal cable routing. Beyond all the useful stuff that is the first thing I noticed, may need to find one to stroke.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The range looks to have gone upmarket, does anyone know if they will still be exclusive to Halfords or will there be other outlets.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:46 am
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

The Team alu road bike w. BB30 looks like a CAAD10 rival. I had one last year, it was a great stiff, light frame.

I ended up selling mine because the smallest size fit like a medium (54cm TT), but they're doing an XS this year so it'll suit people under 5'8".


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:48 am
Posts: 6745
Free Member
 

Theres some prices mentioned on twitter. The CX Team (mid range cyclocross with discs) is 850 pounds with sram apex groupset. Sounds quite reasonable!


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:54 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

The CX Team (mid range cyclocross with discs) is 850 pounds with sram apex groupset. Sounds quite reasonable!

If it rides well, doesn't weigh a tonne, then I think my decision has just been made....


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:59 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

A lot of the prices are visible on the site, click "BUY" when looking at the bike you're interested in.

Seem to have gone up a bit. Good value still though.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 10:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Look at the FS geo though - 670mm bars, 90mm stem and 68.5deg head angle on a 130mm bike? No thanks... Shorter, slacker and wider is the way forwards.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 11:00 am
Posts: 24436
Full Member
 

love the Cx bikes, hate the colour apart from the white one, but the white is bottom of the range with out the frame of the higher two

i'd have had one if the colour was better in the upper range


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 11:03 am
Posts: 11381
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm getting the CX Comp and the Urban Pro


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 11:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Arse ! There was me trying not to spend money, and then this happens. Damn you Boardman ! ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 11:11 am
Posts: 17828
Full Member
 

idiotdogbrain - Member
Look at the FS geo though - 670mm bars, 90mm stem and 68.5deg head angle on a 130mm bike? No thanks... Shorter, slacker and wider is the way forwards.

Is that really so wrong/bad/different??

My 2010 Stumpy FSR came with similar width bar, 15mm shorter stem & 68.5 deg. head angle.
Trek Fuel EX has got a 69 deg. HA and more than likely similar components
Zesty has a 68 deg. HA.....

I like the look of most of their stuff. The CX/Road bikes always get me thinking whether I 'need one'.
Even the hybrid looks good.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 11:14 am
Posts: 14524
Free Member
 

Stupid Q:
What are the benefits of a 2x10 drive? Is it better then 3x10 or 3x9?


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 11:21 am
 Twin
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The CX Team (mid range cyclocross with discs) is 850 pounds with sram apex groupset. Sounds quite reasonable!

That's quite heavy. My bike is only about 30 pounds.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 11:39 am
Posts: 24436
Full Member
 

I'm getting the CX Comp and the Urban Pro

Gis a go mister


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Was in Halfords today and they are already on display and look really nice well equiped bikes.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 1:44 pm
Posts: 14902
Full Member
 

They all look pretty nice, apart from this which is pig ugly

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 2:11 pm
Posts: 1925
Free Member
 

the cx bikes looks nice if alitle heavy, should be ace in a year or so when lighter disc brakes are avail


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 2:11 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

the cx bikes looks nice if alitle heavy, should be ace in a year or so when lighter disc brakes are avail

But some sensible upgrades to finishing kit, wheels and the like ought to shed a good couple of pounds. Then lighter brakes and tyou're onto a proper winner.

Very ahead of the game there. I like.


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

full breakown of the range with some prices here too:

http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/boardman-bikes-2011-performance-series-29508

looks like those full bouncers are about ยฃ1600, great deal for the spec


 
Posted : 04/03/2011 3:06 pm