More Lakes vandalis...
 

[Closed] More Lakes vandalism ๐Ÿ™

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

This is on the sweet tree-lined singletrack that runs up from Troutbeck church and comes out near Robin Lane. Most of the trees on the north side have been felled, and some of the surface filled in with gravel ๐Ÿ™ I noticed a new hut has been built in the field beside, but for the life of me I can't see why the trees were chopped down.


 
Posted : 14/06/2009 7:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh dear ๐Ÿ™ I love that bit ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 8:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There was a death from a falling tree branch a year or so ago. Think it was on Nat Trust land and a school kid on a field trip was killed while sat under a tree.

Since then all the councils/landowners seem to have massivly increased tree felling adjacent to ROW and roads. Round Ladybower/Houndkirk/Sheffield parks there has been months of tree felling/cutting back. Even on quite health looking trees.

Guess it's been flagged as a H&S risk by some jobsworth.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 11:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Guess it's been flagged as a H&S risk by some jobsworth.

but about 30 trees have been cut on one side of the trail, leaving all the trees on the other side (2 metres away) intact. If the above were true wouldn't this mean all forest trails would have to be clearfelled for the height of the trees on either side ?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"a school kid on a field trip was killed while sat under a tree"

That's tragic

"but about 30 trees have been cut on one side of the trail"

But that's vandalism


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 12:40 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Perhaps it was harvesting of a locl resource. Maybe thats why they were planted in the first place, after all the area is a work place that some people use to make a living not just a place of recreation.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Perhaps it was harvesting of a locl resource. Maybe thats why they were planted in the first place, after all the area is a work place that some people use to make a living not just a place of recreation.

But I always thought that the Lakes was just Disneyland for the weekend warrior? ๐Ÿ™

It does seem a shame though, but then, it ain't there for us alone.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Perhaps it was harvesting of a locl resource.

this was a sweet leafy path from the hamlet to the church, not some commercial forestry ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:21 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

chestnut trees (especialy) shed branches for no apparent reason. Perfectly healthy trees that have stood for hundreds of years will drop a perfectly healthy looking (even to an expert) leaf covered branch, even if theres no wind!

What anoys me is the shear number of families who ignore the roped off bit arround old trees and the signs saying "for your own safety.......". Do they think it there for someone else?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Perfectly healthy trees that have stood for hundreds of years will drop a perfectly healthy looking (even to an expert) leaf covered branch

best stay indoors then ?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 2:37 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

no, but is someone's said that they could be a problem they'd be bonkers to leave them up there!

Can you imagine the courtroom if it went wrong and someone was killed/injured:

"so you were advised that the branches may be about to fall down but did nothign about it"

"yes thats right, some mountainbiker on a forum would have winged"


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Simon - is it not possible the trees belong to someone who cropped them? It doesn't have to be commercial forestry in the usual sense for the landowner to consider the trees as a cash crop.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Simon - is it not possible the trees belong to someone who cropped them?

that doesn't stop it being vandalism. Isn't property theft ?

someone's said that they could be a problem they'd be bonkers to leave them up there!

none of them were chestnuts, and half the trees are still there...

This is the track:
[url= http://148.88.53.14/rides/2007/22sep/_DSC0152.jp g" target="_blank">http://148.88.53.14/rides/2007/22sep/_DSC0152.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:44 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Are that track, those track are never long enough. I think you'll find that the trees may formerly have been a hedge. Perhaps the owner has a plans to return it to a hedge. You never know.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 3088
Full Member
 

Going by that pic, they are as mt suggests, former hedgerow trees. Too big to lay now so coppice and restart, overhanging the field (tractor cab clearance, shading) or about to replace the fence and they're in the way/ likely to fail on new fence


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:00 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

timber - Member

Going by your name I'll take thats sorted.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 8655
Free Member
 

Get a chain saw and rebuild it ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:17 pm