Is a bike a vehicle...
 

[Closed] Is a bike a vehicle?

Posts: 8
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Like it says really


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In the eyes of the law or just generally?


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:03 pm
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

Yes, haven't you ever heard of Human Powered Vehicles?


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its transport ๐Ÿ˜‰ gets you from A-B :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:04 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Eyes of the law really, especially as in 'no vehicles'


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:07 pm
Posts: 6745
Free Member
 

No, its classified separately.


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:08 pm
Posts: 9057
Free Member
 

Legally a tomato is a vegatable.
The law is not always correct.
Although it was proved (at the European Court no less) that Jaffa Cakes are indeed cakes, and not biscuits.


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:12 pm
Posts: 1725
Free Member
 

Not only is it a vehicle, it's the best vehicle.


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:43 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

NO


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:46 pm
Posts: 1562
Full Member
 

Legally, yes but it is not a mechanically propelled vehicle, nor is it a motor vehicle.


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 9:55 pm
Posts: 15433
Full Member
 

No a Bike is an Animal like a Tortoise, Badger or Tank....


 
Posted : 15/09/2011 10:03 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

Depends who is asking.

From a personal tax perspective, neither a bicycle or motorcycle are vehicles. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/09/2011 8:48 am
Posts: 3355
Full Member
 

In Scotland I believe a bike is an aid to pedestrians, so no, not really.


 
Posted : 16/09/2011 3:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

andrewh - Member
Legally a tomato is a vegatable.
I'm not convinced that tomatoes have a legal status...but they are fruits, not vegetables.


 
Posted : 16/09/2011 3:11 pm
Posts: 1751
Free Member
 

It is if you try to book a ferry crossing without a car. On the Stena site, it is classed as a vehicle.


 
Posted : 16/09/2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Eyes of the law really, especially as in 'no vehicles'

The classic UK "Evel Knievel" road sign:
[img] [/img]

means no [u]motor[/u] vehicles if that helps.


 
Posted : 16/09/2011 3:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 9057
Free Member
 

Biologically and botanically a tomato is a fruit.
Legally it a vegetable and must be sold as such.


 
Posted : 17/09/2011 11:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
wisdom is knowing not to use it in a fruit salad.


 
Posted : 17/09/2011 11:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is that because it goes hard when it's stale?


 
Posted : 17/09/2011 11:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜ณ oops, sorry, that's Jaffa cakes...


 
Posted : 17/09/2011 11:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

steezysix - Member

Not only is it a vehicle, it's the best vehicle.

Only if it's an Orange 5...


 
Posted : 17/09/2011 11:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends who's asking. From a strict factual point of view it's a vehicle, however most legal use of the term "vehicle" (especially "no vehicles") is a shorthand for motor vehicles (or more strictly mechanically propelled vehicles), in which case a bike isn't.


 
Posted : 17/09/2011 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is a horse a vehicle? It's because it does the same as a car..

Carries passengers, doesn't like people overtaking them, consumes a LOT of fuel, releases a massive amount of crap into the atmosphere (and onto the roads) etc etc?

I also think horse riders should pay road tax. Think of all the turd that the council has to clean up! ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 18/09/2011 12:02 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

YES.

It's a machine designed to transport people and things. Classic definition of a vehicle.

So if you're looking to justify an argument about road signs that state 'give way to vehicle' or some other elated item, then yes, it's just as valid as a car.


 
Posted : 18/09/2011 12:42 am