Forum menu
HOPE / Shimano brak...
 

[Closed] HOPE / Shimano brakes...advice for a friend.

Posts: 12
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#6894413]

General opinion seems to go against my experience.

I thought the general consensus was that HOPEs needed fettling to keep working but had excellent power / modulation and the constant fettling didn't matter as the customer service was so good, whereas Shimano brakes were fit and forget but didn't have the performance. If something did break, you threw them away and bought new brakes.

But...

My HOPE Mono M4s have had new pads once in 8 years (and have had plenty of use). Never been bled. Never needed anything doing to them. They felt almost identical to my friend's new M4 Evo brakes. Excellent modulation, look blingy but surprising little power for 4 pot and 203mm discs.

The Shimanos (M785) have needed to be bled twice in 6 months and 2nd set of pads already (actually third, but I contaminated one set). However, with TLC, they outperform any other brakes I've used. Insanely powerful (true one-finger braking) yet controllable.

It's a topsy-turvy world!

Back on topic. My friend's torn between Tech 3 X2 and XT. To go on a Trance. He weighs 75kg at a guess. For general, all purpose riding.

Which would you chose? Money isn't [i]really[/i] a factor if the HOPEs are worth it.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 5:23 am
 cp
Posts: 8970
Full Member
 

Funnily enough, I have found the same - hope fit and forget and pads last ages.

Both my sets of 785 need regular bleeds to keep them going...


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 5:49 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Just to confuse matters, the message seems to be that SRAM Guide RSCs are now non-shit also.

A substantial proportion of hydraulic brakes suffer from demonic possession. This is a more important factor than any other in whether or not they're annoying.

🙂


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 5:57 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Just to confuse matters, the message seems to be that SRAM Guide RSCs are now non-shit also.

Far too soon to tell.

Just given my 4 year old Tech M4's a quick bleed, feel spot on (comparing with 2014 XT's) Prefer the hopes


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:16 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Far too soon to tell.

Fair...


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:19 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bike Radar gave them 4.5/5 after 6 months. That's soon enough to tell, isn't it? I'll still be sure to mention them though.

I know I'd get M785 and put up with (the easy) bleeding. I think he's looking for justification for HOPE.

Thanks for replies


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:25 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I think he's looking for justification for HOPE.

"Available in anodised red for 2015"?


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:35 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Bike Radar gave them 4.5/5 after 6 months. That's soon enough to tell, isn't it? I'll still be sure to mention them though.

Was working with my mate in the LBS this week, you just have to say Avid Bleed to make steam come out of his ears... The biggest problem is how random the are it's either no need to do anything or useless and impossible to get bled. So 1 set on one demo bike doesn't make me convinced. But if you want to increase the Beta testing group be my guest.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:38 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Avid Bleed

I don't want to get into shilling for SRAM, but the [url= http://enduromag.com.au/site/bike-news/on-review-sram-guide-rsc-hydraulic-disc-brakes/ ]Enduro test[/url] notes that the old "Taperbore" has gone and that:

SRAM have reworked the internals to make it much easier for their factory and the home user to achieve a proper bleed. In fact, they admitted that a perfect bleed was nearly impossible to achieve with the old Taperbore design, which is why a lot of Avid brakes have a slightly spongey feel as the pads engage.

As you say, early to tell, but it doesn't seem 100% obvious that these are necessarily as bad. Although I'm sure their sales managers are delighted that the Avid name has been dropped!

🙂


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:45 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

I think they had to drop the Avid name, the guides are coming on a lot of bikes so we will know soon.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've had Hope and Shimano, and [b]I'm happy[/b] paying twice the price for a brake that isn't twice as powerful. I've always felt Shimano brakes lacked the feel you get with Hope and the quality isn't up there. Shimano's work for a few years and then the non serviceable callipers start to leak and you have to buy new. The whole brake units can be had for so cheap that you just buy a complete new set and after two years you have spent as much on brakes as if you had got the Hope in the first place.

It's more about the feel and adjustability for me though, I can get down [b]very[/b] steep descents in complete control whilst my riding pals are locking up and skidding all over the place.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 8:10 am
Posts: 2082
Full Member
 

I thought the general consensus was that HOPEs needed fettling to keep working but had excellent power / modulation

In my experience Hope brakes need setting up & once done (properly) perform faultlessly. I'm wondering how many folks who do the constant fettling have watched the Hope video on Youtube & taken the time to follow the simple instructions.

D.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 8:15 am
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

money no object, i would have the Hope over the Shimano at any level.

SRAM will have to do a lot more than
a. admit we were all right, that avids are f***in awful and only suitable for rotting in the parts bin
b. rename, rebrand, remarket
ive still not forgiven them for the rubbish return spring in the x9 rear mech.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 8:53 am
Posts: 2811
Full Member
 

SRAM have burnt through their brake credibility.

can't go wrong with shimano or hope. shimano trail a bit more on off, but hope you can keep the wheel moving at the point of traction.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:01 am
 jedi
Posts: 10249
Full Member
 

my zee brakes work better than any of my old hopes


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Hopes (Tech 3's V4's) work better than my XT's. If moneys no issue Hope every time over Shimano


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:31 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I have both
My Shimano need bleeding and i am avoiding it as it is such a pain

as I always say ion this issue there is little difference in performance out the box and the issue is longevity

if you want a brake to work today get shimano as they are cheaper

if you want a brake to be working in 10 years tome get a hope because you can get spares if required.
In operation I dont mind which I use tbh


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Guide RSC on the back is great, more modulation than the SLX or XT I've used previously and similar amounts of overall power.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:41 am
Posts: 943
Free Member
 

Hope everytime for me.
As been said ^ build quality, spares, looks but the big reason is the control you get that ABS feel and keep the wheels just on the edge of skidding even on steep wet leaf mulch slopes etc


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:45 am
Posts: 10535
Full Member
 

I've been using a set of Avid Elixir R's for about 5 or 6 years and they've been faultless. Only now do they need bleeding and I've had a bleed kit waiting all this time and never had to use it, but all the horror stories just make me want to buy new brakes rather than bleed them!!

I'll probably go with SLX's as I can't afford Hope at the moment. Although my birthday is in April..........


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:45 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

SLX for your pal's needs.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OP, how you managed to just use one set of pads in eight years is beyond me. I used one set on just one race.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have this dilemma myself now as the avid front failed, leading to a Tactical Dismount. When they worked they worked well, but were intermittent at best.

I would like to try Mineral oil Brakes, so looks like it's going to be Shimano, Anyone know if hope plan to bring out Mineral oil Brakes?

J


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 10:03 am
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

I have always had hopes and I still have hopes. However I now run Shimano SLX on the bike I use most. I'm sad to say Shimano have overtaken hope in terms of performance. That said I still think hope win out in terms of build quality and aesthetics and I still run them on my pretty bike 🙂 Hope brakes are a thing of beauty and are a much nicer thing to own - also they will last for ever but only because you can replace every single part very easily.

Shimano don't exhibit the same quality or attention to detail - but then they are a lot cheaper and still very good for the price. You have to have xtr to get a 1 piece caliper for example. but there is no getting away from the fact that the cam mechanism in the lever is just a very, very, very good idea... and easily outstrips the competition in terms of power.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 10:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Use V brakes. No bleeding nonsense needed there.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 10:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm in the Shimano camp.

I gave up on any Hope brakes after the brakes with the Mini lever....useless things. All my mates used to rip the piss out of my Hayes brakes but when we went to Morzine, I'm were the only ones that didn't need tweaking.

The Shimano brakes that I've had have been great; original Saints, XT, Deore and Zee. I think the cheaper brakes like Deore and Zee feel better than the posher brakes...lack of servo wave? I don't like the way Hope bakes look either; the levers always look huge and clumpy. The Shimano ones aren't pretty but they're small.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 10:12 am
Posts: 2579
Full Member
 

I've previously run elixirs with no issues, I found bleeding them was straight forward. (I guess the bike shop mechanics which complain are the same ones that struggle with internal cable routing)

I now run hopes, as the elixirs were getting on a bit and wanted a bit more power, but not the on/off feel of shimano's. Since fitting them to both the dh bike last May and the trail bike last August, I've had zero issues. Plenty of power and modulation.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 10:36 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I know it's not relevant, but I've had Avid Juicy 5s on a bike for yonks, never needed to touch em. They're white, so maybe that's why.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 11:00 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

IME I'm very surprised at how good my new XT brakes are. They're extremely powerful, full of feel and the lever shape is perfect.

They're only on my XC full suss and not my AM bike because they're lighter than my Tech M4s currently fitted to my AM bike...and that my AM bike is my bling showcase bike too.

That said, a properly bled and maintained set of Hopes aren't far behind XT in terms of power and feel and will be a far better long term bet for spares and support.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 11:41 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks all.

Sounds like HOPE are still preferred overall... But Shimano take the win for power, sacrificing modulation and build quality.

@darrenpink - I have no idea either. 2nd set of pads but still looking at 4 years a set. I do bed in my new pads and disc cleaner in part of every post ride clean.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have experience of both Hope Mono/Tech X2/V4 and SLX/XT. It seems a few people out there confuse power with modulation. Shimano XT are no more powerful than Hope on a like for like, In fact I'd reckon, set up correctly, they're about the same. In my experience though XT are way more grabby and for that I much prefer the 'squeeze' of a Hope brake. I feel like I'm more in control. I can also put a Hope lever more inboard on the controls.

Hope also, for me, outshine the Shimano for serviceability and parts and customer service.

FWIW I'm a big Shimano fan but I just can't get on with the brakes.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 2:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My new bike came with SRAM Guides, wasn't 100% sure initially but have given them 3 rides to bed in. They're not bad by any means, but compared to my old Zees I don't have the same confidence in them.
Sadly, that means buying a new rear brake hose (new bike is longer than the old one) and a clamp for the SRAM gear shifter (it screws onto the brakes!) so it ends up costing me about £20 to put my old brakes on a new bike :/


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 2:45 pm
Posts: 8201
Full Member
 

It seems a few people out there confuse power with modulation.

Definitely agree on that point. Just because there isn't an instant snap your head forward bite doesn't mean the power isn't there. I've both hopes and shimano and much prefer the gradual feed in of the hopes of the shimanos (way to grabby)


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 4:26 pm
Posts: 7621
Full Member
 

I've got a box of broken Hope brakes - 3 sets of M4s - stuck pistons mainly.

All my bikes now have Shimano brakes that work flawlessly. Saint M810s are what I use on my main bike and they are absolutely bulletproof.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 4:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I know I'd get M785 and put up with (the easy) bleeding.

+1

But I'd also pay money to ride Hopes as my (admittedly only) pair of old Minis have been as good as gold, albeit not a patch on the power of modern Shimanos.

Personally I run latest model Deores now on both bikes after using XTs in various incarnations for years. In my humble opinion the price/power ratio is currently unbeatable. The lever shape is a thing of beauty too.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a box of broken Hope brakes - 3 sets of M4s - stuck pistons mainly

A quick wipe with silicon lube on the caliber piston will put them right. Or chuck them in a box with my address on them so I can dispose of them safely 🙂


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 4:44 pm
Posts: 6811
Full Member
 

This thread reminded me I needed to price up brakes. The XT's with Ice rotas can be had for just over £150 where as the cheapest Hope are twice that. As much as I love Hope I'll have to go for the XT's.

If money was no object I'd have Hope though and still might get some second hand.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 4:49 pm
Posts: 8201
Full Member
 

I've got a box of broken Hope brakes - 3 sets of M4s - stuck pistons mainly.

Or chuck them this way, I'll repair them, sell them and split the money with you.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the cam mechanism in the lever is just a very, very, very good idea... and easily outstrips the competition in terms of power.

Ironically its the non linearity of the cam mechanism that causes the lack of feel.


 
Posted : 27/02/2015 7:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Failing Hopes in the Alps a few years back blew any trust I had in their brakes. Shimano every time. They just work. Had three sets, no issues over many years. And a damn sight cheaper than Hopes. Yes, yes, yes, 'plenty' spares. But never needed spares with Shimano's. Hope hubs I'll always use, awesome. Brakes, nah, don't trust them and not willing to spend all that money to be proven right/wrong. And I may be alone in this point, but they look gash. Too many graphics and 'over designed' in how they look for my taste. Way too, and hate saying it, 'blingy'.


 
Posted : 28/02/2015 1:44 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

There must be a lot of people with very grabby big powerful hands saying shimano have no modulation. Saint and deore that I run are easy to feather, lock and everything inbetween, you just squeeze less firmly!


 
Posted : 28/02/2015 9:23 am
 FOG
Posts: 3020
Full Member
 

Absolutely glasgowdan. Any brake gets grabby if you are ham fisted!
Shimano has plenty of feel. I have had SLX on two bikes for five years which have been bled but remain working perfectly. SRAM on the other hand never worked from new on my sons bike and despite warranty work never got much better


 
Posted : 28/02/2015 10:08 am
Posts: 1748
Free Member
 

Shimano every time. They just work
For some yes, I've had a lot of sets blow up for me. I'm on Hope E4s now, which I haven't needed to touch once since cutting them about 8 months ago - in that time I probably blew three sets of Shimano.

They're fine as you can just use the warranty to get a new pair each time, but I was getting fed up or not having brakes for a few weeks at a time.

There must be a lot of people with very grabby big powerful hands saying shimano have no modulation.

They're grabby *compared* to Hope or Avid. Which is a wide range of brakes - which all have a very high level of modulation, so putting them in context with those, they're grabby.

Any brake gets grabby if you are ham fisted!

As above, it's not being ham-fisted - it's that in comparison to the other popular brands Shimano brakes are less modulated. It's how they're designed, Shimanos get progressively weaker in power the more you pull, Avid and Hope get progressively stronger the more you pull.

That means the first pull is harder on Shimano, and they don't get much stronger. Hope/Avid generally are weak in the first pull, and get much stronger the harder you pull the lever. That's a pretty good example of low vs high modulation.

There's not a right or a wrong, just a preference. Implying people are idiots and ham-fisted is just plain wrong, it's just physics and mechanics.


 
Posted : 28/02/2015 6:10 pm