Have 29ers finally ...
 

[Closed] Have 29ers finally won the wheel size war ?

Posts: 23322
Free Member
 

3” gazzaloddis probably had the same diameter...


 
Posted : 15/06/2018 9:39 pm
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

Sounds awesome Raybanwomble, enjoy!


 
Posted : 15/06/2018 10:24 pm
Posts: 16449
Full Member
 

29ers have won the war for me due to what I ride and my height etc but that doesn't mean they need to win the war for everybody else out there. 😉


 
Posted : 16/06/2018 2:46 pm
Posts: 3382
Full Member
 

raybanwomble Member

Anyway, the new bike is **** awesome – but I’m not posting it because I don’t want you arseholes recognising me.

Is it a Cotic?


 
Posted : 18/06/2018 10:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Damn straight, just look at it

https://imgur.com/j0w1XM8


 
Posted : 18/06/2018 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TL;TR - short answer - no.

Look around average trail centre or weekend warrior area (Peaslake good example). Count the 29ers vs 650b. It's not the former, and the latter is selling big time.

Getting more popular in the AM/Enduro events though. XCer night group I ride with, mostly 29ers. There's definitely a growing market for it. I can't see the industry and retailers are ready to bin 650b when they've only just got over the switch from 26.

And as said, some of us are short-arses. As amazing as a 29er may be, they're too big for me. It's also a step too far on the low acceleration scale. 650b is already noticeably slower for me accelerating, but once up to speed it flies. I miss 26 at times though for acceleration (except when I ride my old 26er 😀 )


 
Posted : 18/06/2018 10:43 am
Posts: 6745
Free Member
 

Does it really make a noticeable difference for acceleration? Has anyone run the numbers on this? surely the weight difference is tiny in comparison to weight of rider + bike, rotating weight or not.


 
Posted : 18/06/2018 12:50 pm
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

Does it really make a noticeable difference for acceleration? Has anyone run the numbers on this? surely the weight difference is tiny in comparison to weight of rider + bike, rotating weight or not.

For the likes of us, yes, I agree, it's really negligible if anything. I recall Minaar saying last year that they didn't think the 29er was the be all and end all, as the 650B accelerated quicker anyway, seemed to pretty much be down to him having a bike that fitted him better.


 
Posted : 18/06/2018 1:45 pm
Posts: 20944
 

Does it really make a noticeable difference for acceleration?

Sure. If you want it to.


 
Posted : 18/06/2018 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The weight difference between a modern 26" and 29" bike is negligible. As I posted earlier: Cotic Soul - 12kg, Cotic Solaris - 12.5kg.

I don't have a 26" wheeled bike so can't compare (the Soul is my wife's) that but if I put 650b+ wheels/tyres on the Solaris then it is sluggish in comparison when accelerating but once up to speed then there's sod all difference, if anything the plus tyres "feel" faster as they then have the momentum. I haven't done any empirical tests though.

The rider height/size point is valid - not everyone is 6ft tall. If the bike fits and you like it, does it really matter what wheel size it is?


 
Posted : 18/06/2018 2:03 pm
Page 2 / 2