hard tail or full s...
 

[Closed] hard tail or full sus? Which one do you take to the trail?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hey,

sure a lot of you guys have both bikes so was wondering how you make the decision on what bike to take?

Black runs = full sus?
Red/blu = hardtail?

Love my all mountain full sus but sometimes it just numbs the riding on flatter stuff. Thoughts?


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:50 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

full sus to the mountains
hardtail to the hills is my rule of thumb


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

good call!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hardtail for work out (also sharpen up your bike handling)

fullsus for fun (jumps/drops)

both get ridden any grade green to black doesn't matter


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Which ever one is working. It just a bike and some hills.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:19 am
 Soup
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SS Ti hardtail, fully rigid every time.

Keeping it real since '92


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

full suss is overcomplicated and energy sapping ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

roundwheels - yes i agree, the hardtail is good for sharpening the skills on less demanding terrain.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

full suss is overcomplicated and energy sapping

lets be honest here its not, its only complicated if your brain is in upside down


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

though, if you ride one of these little rippers:

[url] http://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Eagle-Vista-Suspension-Mountain/dp/B001ASJL6U/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=sports&qid=1236641681&sr=8-1 [/url]

get pro pedal on the case son!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

giddyrob i dont mean jump in at the deep end. start by puting you seat down, it also makes you think about your lines more (looking for the smoother line)then go back to your f/s and you well feel like a god .


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

? seat down? You mean when you are riding the hardtail as a training tool for the full sus.

Don't really ride trails with my seat up though. Save that for xc stuff ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a mood thing. My HT is more of a barge/blunder-tank than the 5" FS which is more zoom, skippity hop. Am thinking of dismantling the HT and rebuilding it on a 15" Brand-X dirt/4x frame - just to practice my handling around town features and the on local dirt/quarries.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:05 am
Posts: 34939
Full Member
 

I only have a hard tail. Makes life easy


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

not if you are on a downhill course ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:14 am
Posts: 34939
Full Member
 

Never come across one I haven't been able to get down yet.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

try nz! Glentress blackrun (love it though i do) is a chicken run compared to some stuff over here.

Why aren't the downhiller's running hardtails if that's all ya need ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Full suss, 2 reasons....

#1 I've got arthritis in my spine (Ankylosing Spondylitis)

#2 I only own one MTB now, had to sell the hardtail & oldskool rigid Scott

I used to ride rigid steel forks & frames BITD, but I simply cannot ride even a hardtail off road without being in major pain for a long time afterwards.

I do use a oldskool roadie ('78 Falcon with Shimano 600 Arabesque) as my beer scooter though....


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"try nz! Glentress blackrun (love it though i do) is a chicken run compared to some stuff over here."

Glentress Black (more like a red) is a chicken run compared to some of the stuff in the UK too

"Why aren't the downhiller's running hardtails if that's all ya need"
Probably because they're wanting to get down as quick as they can. That and marketting hype


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 2:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

point is, there is a point to full sus bikes. Just like there is always room for hardtails.

I like both xc and all mountain stuff so it's good to have a hardtail and a full sus. Though I reckon a cove stiffee would be fun on some of the runs I do.

james - I agree glentress should really be a red run, but it is still ****ing mint for a long blast!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 3:35 am
Posts: 3361
Full Member
 

FS = cracked
LT HT = cracked
XC HT it is then


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 8:50 am
 Taz
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Whichever one I fancy. After several months of HT I am now back on the FS.

Can ride anything on my HT that I ride on my FS but no question the FS is faster (but not necessarily more fun) on something like a DH run.

Riding both gives you different skills that transfer back to the other.

However it just a bike and some hills so I think it best not to over think it ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 8:58 am
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

depends if i own a full suss at the time, i either get bored of havign nothing to do or scare myself shitless with the extra speed.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 10:06 am
Posts: 450
Free Member
 

Varies. Lately taking the Stiffee everywhere. Usually ride FS if it is a long day as it is less tiring on the old body


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 10:10 am
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

Tend to take my FS to trail centres and up on the big hills, and use my HT for things like blatting round the local woods or if there's going to be some tarmac involved.

Then again if I feel like leathering it round a trail centre sans black run I'll take the HT and if i wanna prat about in the woods in bomb holes and on jumps etc I'll use my FS.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 10:34 am
Posts: 2522
Free Member
 

full sussers are not required in the UK - well for uplift days but thats about it


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 10:35 am
Posts: 3573
Free Member
 

i take either, depending on my mood and riding location.
neither's better, just different.....


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 11:58 am
 Olly
Posts: 5260
Full Member
 

ive ridden Hartail on double blacks with no problems, but primary bike is a full suss, and as trail centres tend to allow you to carry more speed, i go with FS now.
zoom zoom
hardtail has now been delegated to Singlespeeding, so it used for especially muddy rides, and rides where i cant be bothered with the cleaning afterwards.
though still fun at a trail centre, as lack of pedalability means you can focu more on keeping your speed, staying off the brakes and riding smooth.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One bike, one gear, one me, one hill.
Just ride!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:19 pm
 GEDA
Posts: 1631
Free Member
 

HT - Cheap, works

FS - Wee hee for big rocks and drops.

HT is all that is needed for 'fun' in the Peaks for all but a few downhills. (With a good pair of big volume tyres and good forks).Even going around Innerleithen XC track the other day and I thought it would be more fun on the HT.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

double blacks where? in the UK then fair enough but in Canada then I am impressed, some of the single blacks I couldn't see how you would walk down them, let alone the double blacks (30 ft gap jumps anyone)


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:20 pm
 Olly
Posts: 5260
Full Member
 

UK im afraid, never been abroad ๐Ÿ™
i think the grading system is a bit vague anyway.
Llandegla black for instance is only as black as you make it.
i think its more an indication of how much speed you can carry around there, theres nothing "hard" as such...

whereas, yep, some runs come up as reds and seem to comprise soley angular rocks spattered in blood....
i hate rock gardens ๐Ÿ™ no flow, no fun.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

LoL Olly, UK blacks are Canada blues so you really don't need a FS for any I've ridden over here. Mind you Stainburn and Laggan blacks (which I haven't ridden yet) are supposed to be almost black worthy trails.

Last year I was in Nelson looking at some of the trails and laughing, as it looked like you would need ropes to get down some of the stuff ๐Ÿ˜‰

nb: and I am a very average rider ( ie: shit )


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:37 pm
Posts: 941
Free Member
 

[i]sharki - Member
One bike, one gear, one me, one hill.
Just ride!
[/i]

There's a t-shirt slogan and some money in there somewhere Sharki ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:11 pm
 duir
Posts: 1176
Free Member
 

Hardtail for everything UK except Downhill courses. Even then sometimes use the hardtail for downhill.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:24 pm
 Olly
Posts: 5260
Full Member
 

meh meh
use what you want to use i say.
theres no NEED to even get out the car in the first place

horses for courses, and all that guff.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

at the moment Im running a hardtail for everthing..

but thats because I havent got the pennies to get a full susser yet


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[b]me:full suss is overcomplicated and energy sapping[/b]

lets be honest here its not, its only complicated if your brain is in upside down

I meant 'prone to failure'. On my Intense, the shock eye bush would last about 10 weeks before it started knocking, and I'd have to replace numerous small cartridge bearings every year and dismantle the air shock to grease the insides etc. And all this effort to make the ride over rocks less exciting ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"either get bored of havign nothing to do or scare myself shitless with the extra speed"

Yeah, I've noticed that! I really like my FS as a do-it-all bike, speed, pop, etc but I can't get over the feeling that a really good, 25lb HT is the best fun for 2-4 blasts on typical trails around here.

Fancy a Whyte 19 now!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:35 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

FS as i cant be bothered with fully rigid beating me up all the time.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

'prone to failure'. On my Intense

this i have to agree with you on this simon i have/had the same problem with my 5.5 changing bushes(x2) and replacing shock bolts (X3)but when she working she great


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

:oops:excuse the cave man talk


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 1:59 pm
Posts: 23322
Free Member
 

changing shock bushing is a five minute job, if that. hardly a major price to pay.

i ride what I have, hardtails can be fun but bounce is funner.

depends if you just grind/plod along or like to play around...


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 2:02 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]full sussers are not required in the UK - well for uplift days but thats about it [/i]

LOL! There had to be one! ๐Ÿ˜†

[i]Black runs/Red/blu[/i] - what are these?


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 2:05 pm
Posts: 3573
Free Member
 

richc - laggan black is perfectly manageable on a LT HT with decent tyres, and a good 130mm+ fork.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 2:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wonder whether I could manage the black route at Laggan on my FS. Don't think I'd contemplate it on my HT!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 2:38 pm
Posts: 2522
Free Member
 

[i]LOL! There had to be one! [/i]

I was hoping for much more of an attack than that ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 4:17 pm
Posts: 20598
Full Member
 

Either/or, doesn't bother me. Neither one is better, just different. If I know the trails are going to be muddy then usually the HT, fewer moving parts to wear out.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 45993
Free Member
 

I have one bike, so that one gets taken out for a ride.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oringsta

I can sympathise with you on your back condition,I also suffer with back pain,but not as bad as you,I can get away with a Hardtail but I do prefer my meta 5.2 (2007) for its comfort factor.

I use the Full sus for the mountains,and am trying to be selective! on the hilly/rocky stuff with the Hardtail (Hummer)Great on the trail centres though,and I think thats where I will be using it the most.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 5:37 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

More often than not, I ride my FS because it means I can go faster than I can on my HT.
There are some places that I ride where I prefer my HT though.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 5:41 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Whichever one I fancy riding or haven't dismantled.

You can ride most stuff on most bikes, you just have to ride it differently.

And that's the fun of it.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 7:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

the hardtail is locked up in the shed back in the uk so no chance of getting on that till I come back in the summer. Shame as some of the trails in NZ are through native bush where there is literally just enough room for the bars, which are a hell of a lot wider on the fs.

Interesting thoughts though guys, just need to buy a vehicle big enough for both so I can choose when I get to the trails. Whatever the weather I will be removing that shimano xt tat from the rear of the hardtail and getting the sram x9 bobbed on!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 10:34 pm