Guaranteed Death......
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Guaranteed Death.......

54 Posts
39 Users
0 Reactions
118 Views
Posts: 1310
Free Member
Topic starter
 

.....and/or facial disfigurement, now available direct to you from ebay.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/161557565342


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 8:55 am
Posts: 10953
Free Member
 

Death is our only certainty.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 8:56 am
Posts: 10953
Free Member
 

Which on further investigation, seems likely to be premature!

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 8:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FFS.....


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 8:58 am
Posts: 1460
Full Member
 

I can't think what reason anyone would have to do that... fatbike mod?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:01 am
Posts: 7556
Full Member
 

C'mon lets not been unfair. I mean whats the worst that could happen?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:06 am
Posts: 28550
Free Member
 

are immaculate accept a scratch next to crown

Oh yes. They looks perfect.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:06 am
Posts: 436
Free Member
 

good grief. Perfect working order you say?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wouldn't recommend doing enduro with them cus marzocchi standard bomber forks are meant for freerid only

Rampage only, obviously.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:10 am
Posts: 14654
Free Member
 

**** me £85 bid? I'm sure I'd be lucky to get that for my unmodded Shermans (any takers?)


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:11 am
Posts: 436
Free Member
 

I think the mod adds value?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:13 am
Posts: 28550
Free Member
 

I think the mod adds value?

<Gets lump hammer and drill, heads to garage>


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:15 am
Posts: 6926
Free Member
 

When asked what the plate and bolts are for I got this reply

The upper crown of marzocchi are usually much wider like boxer forks and love the effect it gives therefore the titanium plate let's it have a wider angle
😯
Looks like aluminium to me..


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

chambord - Member

I can't think what reason anyone would have to do that... fatbike mod?

Somewhere on the listing he mentions Manitou - being that that bridge doesn't have the 'M' of a Marz bridge I'm going to say the following thought process happened...

"Oh shit, I've destroyed the lowers on my Marz forks"

"but it's okay, because I have a set of Manitou lowers in the shed"

"Oh dear, they don't appear to be wide enough"

"Vera!!! have you seen my hacksaw?"


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:49 am
Posts: 7556
Full Member
 

So the extra holes?

Are they:

A: A really clever way to save weight
B: A indication that he made more than one attempt at bolting the fork together
C: A way of guaranteeing the lowers will fail catastrophically


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:53 am
Posts: 28550
Free Member
 

Somewhere on the listing he mentions Manitou

Also note the scraped-off decal on the lowers.

Stanchions look to be in excellent nick though, so well worth it.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:57 am
Posts: 13405
Full Member
 

P-Jay, this is my conclusion as well, a brilliantly engineered solution I'm sure all will agree.

Richmtb, B with a side of C included.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:57 am
Posts: 43572
Full Member
 

[quote=richmtb ]So the extra holes?
Are they:
A: A really clever way to save weight
B: A indication that he made more than one attempt at bolting the fork together
C: A way of guaranteeing the lowers will fail catastrophically
D: Couldn't afford enough "titanium" to make the plate as wide as he first thought.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:58 am
Posts: 10340
Free Member
 

Love the fact that it's not even mentioned in the condition or description.
Good old ebay.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 9:59 am
Posts: 1310
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Maybe he saw [url= http://singletrackworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/magura-engineers-diy-fatbike-fork/ ]this[/url] and thought he could do something similar but with [s]a much lower level of[/s] no expertise.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:02 am
Posts: 54
Free Member
 

this is why I love STW, always something here to put a smile on my face


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:02 am
Posts: 1048
Free Member
 

I'm intrigued by the tyre rub on the inside of the arch. "Flexy" springs to mind.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:02 am
Posts: 28550
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Nah. I think there may be a slight dish problem in his wheel. In fact, that's some impressive clearance his mod has left him. 🙂


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:05 am
Posts: 1048
Free Member
 

Nah. I think there may be a slight dish problem in his wheel.
Wow.

I don't know why, but despite the quality engineering, the word "stiction" is now springing to mind.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:08 am
 Drac
Posts: 50457
 

I think the mod adds value?

It's got nothing to do with us.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:10 am
 iolo
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

At least he says they're not for Enduro.
Freeride only on these forks.
Perfect for some North Shore 10ft to flat or even the next Red Bull Rampage.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:10 am
Posts: 1310
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Not sure that frame he's had them on is meant to have that much travel either.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:16 am
Posts: 1048
Free Member
 

I wouldn't worry northernmatt, he's probably sawed the frame in half and spaced it out somehow.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hypothetical question; what if someone with no knowledge of bikes or forks bought them and seriously injured themselves?
Considering that the seller is stating that they're original and safe, and suitable for freeride; could he be liable?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:24 am
Posts: 3610
Full Member
 

apart from my first impression of WT actual F, where did the 'zocchi thing even come from?

Those stantions looks like Manitou (they've got 'Hayes' etched into the top of them) and the sliders are reverse arch like Manitou so what part of them are actually Marzocchi?

And if they're both Manitou why is there such a big gap???

I'm really confused.

😯 😕 😯


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:27 am
Posts: 3610
Full Member
 

Even more confused now - just noticed the 'M' in the crown, so why the Hayes branding on the stantions... 😕 😉


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:29 am
Posts: 28550
Free Member
 

Hypothetical question; what if someone with no knowledge of bikes or forks bought them and seriously injured themselves?

They could own him with [s]half[/s] a third of a bomber, I suppose.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Pinkster - Member
apart from my first impression of WT actual F, where did the 'zocchi thing even come from?

Those stantions looks like Manitou (they've got 'Hayes' etched into the top of them) and the sliders are reverse arch like Manitou so what part of them are actually Marzocchi?

The Hayes thing is a sticker. You can see the edge in one of the pics. Bodes well when everything else looks so pro.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:41 am
 lerk
Posts: 185
Free Member
 

I like the small detail that he uses nyloc nuts, but the screws aren't long enough to meet the nylon!


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:41 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

The Hayes thing is a sticker Shirley. Just like he appears to have a Thomson one on the other leg.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 10:46 am
Posts: 7556
Full Member
 

"perfect working order"

Well that's one way to describe them

I'm also pretty sure those are shill bids


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A Gem.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 1:51 pm
Posts: 17176
Full Member
 

Do you reckon he could convert my 26 forks to 29?
TF need to snap him up before someone else does.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 1:54 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

SNap I see what you did there

As others say WTF goes through someone s mind to both do that then [ considerign the dish and tyre rub] consider it a success and fit for sale


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:00 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

FFS that advert going to take some beating (unlike the forks) so many levels of wrong.


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did he not realise that when he split the lowers the hub of the wheels would not longer fit properly as there would be a gap?


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought it was a Go Pro mount in order to film his own suicide


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:26 pm
Posts: 17371
Full Member
 

I think all it needs is a lower plate. That part is just a fork brace, and it seems to have a through axle.

I rode motorbikes with much less bracing than that on rough roads, and at far higher speeds than that will ever see.

I would do the same, just tidier, and with a stiffer interconnection.

There's nought wrong with his idea, just the execution IMO.

Edit:

Here's one I prepared earlier with no brace at all (when it was hard to buy fatbike forks)

[url= https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4099/4907146688_4bb04b7809_b.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4099/4907146688_4bb04b7809_b.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 2:41 pm
Posts: 1352
Free Member
 

There was a engineer a while back for Marzocchi (iirc) that cut a fork in half and widened the brace to fit on a fat bike. Cannot for the life of me find it now but his solution was a lot more thought out than that one!


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Would duct tape work then? I have no metal plates available... 😆


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 4:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There was a engineer a while back for Marzocchi (iirc) that cut a fork in half and widened the brace to fit on a fat bike. Cannot for the life of me find it now but his solution was a lot more thought out than that one!

just slightly neater

http://singletrackworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/magura-engineers-diy-fatbike-fork/


 
Posted : 14/01/2015 4:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who in their right mind is bidding on these?


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 7:31 am
Posts: 844
Free Member
 

Epicyclo - how did you get those forks to work? Doesn't look to be too much room between the tyre and fork crown. I'm guessing you ran them locked out?


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 7:56 am
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

ha ha
After all this mud slinging it looks as though he's going to get a good price!
Who's laughing now


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 7:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

muddyground - Member
Epicyclo - how did you get those forks to work? Doesn't look to be too much room between the tyre and fork crown. I'm guessing you ran them locked out?

I seem to remember he had a build thread on here for them. The point was that they didn't work at all. You can see the seatpost clamps that hold the cut down lowers in the one position.

Edit: [url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/fatbike-forks-diy-no-welding-from-junk ]here.[/url]


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 8:57 am
Posts: 70
Free Member
 

My 26 er bikes have a future - off to the garage to lengthen the chainstays.
Hacksaw. Tick
Ally plate. Tick
Jubilee clips. Tick. ( for added safety)


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 9:03 am
Posts: 20755
 

zippykona,

Bin Dun

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/heckler-conversion-to-29er-o


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 1:20 pm
Posts: 3380
Full Member
 

[i]For the axle hub wich isn't included, distance is about half a cm, it literally can be moved that much to one side, it does not affect or change the look, just has to be a manitou sherman one.
[/i]
Okay cool no worries then, glad you put my mind at ease.


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sheesh.

I can't belive that there are bids up to £85 on these - I struggled to get there for some mint Shermans a couple of years ago.

As for the execution...Darwin's theory has fallen down here!


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 2:14 pm
Posts: 17371
Full Member
 

muddyground - Member
Epicyclo - how did you get those forks to work?

I built them to be rigid. It let me experiment with HAs and offsets.


 
Posted : 15/01/2015 7:11 pm