[Closed] Fuel ex question

As long as you stay within pretty much the same travel it should be ok.
I was thinking of replacing trek ex 8's stock fox 32series drcv forks with revs rct3 but probably need to shorten it's travel as 150mm would ruin the bike's geometry.

No, fork offset is normal.

150mm revs is what I was going to put on it 🙁

What year frame?

Fuel ex has standard fork. It's their 29ers that have larger offset fork.

someone correct me please, but I think if you put 150mm forks that will raise the front end and change the angle and the geometry of the frame(fuel ex normally comes with 120 or 130mm forks). however I have done it on other bikes like stumpjumper fsr or trek hardtail and never had any issues.

Running a 110/140 Talas on mine with no issues...but think 150mm maybe a step too far.

ran mine with 120/150 talas without issue. In fact I really likes the way it slackened it...

Thanks for the replies guys its a 2010 frame.
M1llhouse , what's it like in 150mm mode, my revs are dual position 120-150mm .

Cheers

Isn't it their G2 geometry that uses an unusual fork offset? i.e. the bikes that used to be under the Gary Fisher banner (Super fly, Rumble Fish etc)

Yey its the Fisher branded treks that have the offset, all the others are standard.

Why not just get a Remedy frame instead?

Would love a remedy but can't find one second hand in my price range .

Well they work great at 120mm, so you could keep it at that length all the time if you didn't like it at 150mm.

hambl90 - Member

Thanks for the replies guys its a 2010 frame.
M1llhouse , what's it like in 150mm mode, my revs are dual position 120-150mm .

I really likes it. but rapidly came to the conclusion that i "needed" a bigger bike as it became a bit unbalanced (front was controlled lovely but rear became a bit wayward getting outside of it's {my} comfort zone) so bought a 2013 spicy 516.