Forum menu
Going back on a hardtail? Yeah and also I just took the rear springs off the car and welded in some steel pipe. The thing looses it's back end all the time so I have to go a lot slower but I love how simple and connected to the ground it feels....
Stand up when you're driving your car do you? Does it jump well? 😉
JCL - MemberGoing back on a hardtail? Yeah and also I just took the rear springs off the car and welded in some steel pipe. The thing looses it's back end all the time so I have to go a lot slower but I love how simple and connected to the ground it feels....
Good comparison. While we were at it, I added an engine to my road bike because it was much slower than my motorbike.
How does it handle?
weeksy - MemberHow does it handle?
Top tube's a wee bit long.
I tried FS for a bit. It was a 120mm xc bike, it climbed amazingly well which was it's main positive attribute. It felt to me like it didn't tame the trail enough on the descents to make the extra maintenance worthwhile. Sold it and went back to a hardtail which just felt so much more playful.
It also gives me a sense of accomplishment to keep up with guys on carbon FS bikes. Not all of you obviously but a good many of you!
rob jackson - Member
david why would you run a bfe at 100mm travel????
Cos its awesome.
But 160mm on a hardtail, only really any use for straight lining stuff downhill (but a full sus is better for this). Not much use anywhere else.
May aswell just use a full sus. You sort of miss the point of a hardtail with 160mm forks.
Errr. 100mm on a jump track etc. 140 for fun
One of each have to say its fun on a hardtail and in the winter it's more simple.
dtalyforth - my lyrics are dual position so 130/160 can therefore spend the majority of time in 130 if I want, the point is I am fed up with bearings, bushes etc and fancy something simple.
Just want it to not be to much of a handicap on the rougher stuff. Tbh can't see that 100mm forks fit with my riding and not what a bfe is designed for.
I know everyone's seen it, but it's always worth another go 😀
You could always stick a 10mm spacer in the Lyrik for 150-120 if it feels too lanky.
I had not seen it, fairly sure I can't quite match them on the skill level though :?.
Can you drop the spacer in the dual position ones.
Neither can I but that doesn't matter! It's inspiring none the less and shows what can be done.
Check out this thread; [url= http://forums.mtbr.com/shocks-suspension/2012-lyrik-solo-air-travel-adjust-150-a-727063.html ]LINK[/url].
The final poster appears to nail it. I've only had a quick look, there's probably more info out there than this alone.
Or you could buy a 110-140 U-Turn Pike 454 off me... 
(I wasn't originally intending to pitch this to you, but it has just occurred to me).
I know it's all cool and DJ style to run short forks but the trails I ride are a lot less smooth than dirt jumps, the negative pumps (ie holes!) that need fork extension benefit from the greater actual sag on a longer fork, and with just that bit more fork length you can ride a fork that's soft enough to track well in corners without having to be really stiff to avoid wallowing or bottoming frequently - like my 2010 Floats - the ramp up of air is good in this context. I've got almost the same travel in my front tyre as in a sagged 100mm fork! dt, what do you know about corners anyway, all straight lines int'north innit? 😉
Another consideration - how much more travel do your legs have than your arms?
You sort of miss the point of a hardtail with 160mm forks.
You also forgot to mention that they handle like a bag of shit with long travel forks.
Herman Shake - Member
Neither can I but that doesn't matter! It's inspiring none the less and shows what can be done.
Just because something CAN be done by someone, doesn't mean the rest of us could or indeed should.
I've seen people swallow swords... doesn't mean i'm showing the bread knife down my throat when i make breakfast later. I've seen people gap jumping the Grand Canyon, but i've not attempted it on my KTM....
etc etc ad infinitum.
But 160mm on a hardtail, only really any use for straight lining stuff downhill (but a full sus is better for this). Not much use anywhere else.May aswell just use a full sus. You sort of miss the point of a hardtail with 160mm forks.
Er what?? Happy with 150/160 HT's nothing to do with straight lining DH stuff it's nippy agile and has a big fork 🙂 My 150/160mm Hardtails are fun in a different way.
kudos as stated several times the lyrics adjust 130 or 160 so should be able to sort the issue of handling just curious about if people regret the change. Assuming the hardtail is set up right.
Herman o thanks for the offer on the pike's but going to stick with what I have.
straight lining DH
Question - apart from some descents in the Lakes and specific DH tracks could someone point out to me WHY anyone really needs a 'rig' for UK riding?
You also forgot to mention that they handle like a bag of shit with long travel forks.
+1, can't stand the feeling of a hardtail with long forks. Feels far more balanced with shorter ones. Plus it gets the bb and front end lower 🙂
Weeksy, the world of MTB videos would be a bit bland if they were always within the confines of what the average rider can do. Why should you or anyone else's capability on a bike affect what is available as entertainment? It's just a fun vid and they happen to be on LTHTs, there's no instruction or judgement about whether you should imitate them. And Jinya Nishiwaki's in it and he's cool so there.
Sprocker, no worries.
Herman Shake - Member
Weeksy, the world of MTB videos would be a bit bland if they were always within the confines of what the average rider can do. Why should you or anyone else's capability on a bike affect what is available as entertainment? It's just a fun vid and they happen to be on LTHTs, there's no instruction or judgement about whether you should imitate them. And Jinya Nishiwaki's in it and he's cool so there.
The point i was trying to make was that just becuase an expert CAN do something like this on a HT, doesn't mean that for your average rider the HT is the best or most appropriate tool.
+1, can't stand the feeling of a hardtail with long forks. Feels far more balanced with shorter ones. Plus it gets the bb and front end lower
I've yet to see a bike that can balance itself without a rider on board. 😉 How low a BB and front end do you need? Lower BB = more stable but harder to pop up and less clearance, lower front end = better on flatter stuff, worse on steeper stuff. Everything's a compromise and there are riders and terrain for whom longer forks perform better.
I've been riding my BMX on a mostly offroad commute for some months now - and the bridleway is getting a bit knackered in this weather, with potholes and suchlike appearing. On the rough bits I have to practically manual through them - the rear wheel will roll over most things if my legs drive and pump through but the front wheel will hook up and stop dead on the tiniest things. Make the terrain rougher and the wheels bigger and it's just the same - your legs can drive (not in the pedalling sense) the rear wheel through much rougher stuff than the front wheel will roll through.
It's partly because the legs are acting as suspension and partly because the bike's frame works like trailing arm rear suspension with a rearward axle path, because the rider is much heavier than the bike, so the rider's mass pivots the bike forwards thus lifting the rear wheel. When the front wheel hits a bump the rider's mass still pivots the bike forwards thus pushing the front wheel down, making the bump much worse!
I've yet to see a bike that can balance itself without a rider on board.
I just mean it feels weird if there's a load of suspension on the front whilst the back of the bike is still solid (other than your legs). Dunno, I came to mtb from bmx so I don't like having a wallowy bike. I have to run my suspension hard to keep it feeling "right" to me. Tried various fork lengths on the Blender, BFe and Trailstar and 125ish always feels like the sweet spot. And there are no issues getting a Blender to "pop" whilst still being stable and fast, if you've ever ridden one you'll know how much of a fun bike it is!
Sorry for the on topic post lads, I don't regret moving from my Zesty to a hardtail at all and its been a couple of years now.
Another advocate of long travel hardtails feeling wrong.
For my mountain biking, i wouldn't without a full sus. If i had the choice, i wouldn't be without a hardtail too, but simply can't afford it.
I think if the terrain you ride properly warrants full sus, you'll regret only having a hardtail, if your terrain only warrants a hardtail, it's no fun only having a full sus.
It depends where you ride and what you like.
Which hard tails would you people class as good all rounders then?decent for climbing but not xc race bikes,but also decent when pointing down but not a long travel slack hardcore hard tail.I too am looking for inspiration for a future hardtail purchase but want something that sits nicely in the middle,any ideas ??sorry if this should be a different thread but I thought it was relative.
Are you wanting to stick to 26" wheels?
I don't mind,I'm just wanting recommendations for decent all round hard tails to have a closer look at and test if possible.It would mainly be used for Cannock chase and trail centres ,llandegla and the likes.
Rode my Blender at Cannock on Monday and it was fine, not even bothered by the slightly slack seat angle - looks slack on paper but to actually ride its fine... probably not one to go for if you're tall though.
I ride a blue pig, i get on really well with the long travel/slack angles. but i've been thinking about changing to a full bouncer. But then i keep looking at the slackine, it's a lovely bike.
I have decided to make the change looking at bfe, chromag stylus will be run with 160/130 dual position lyrics, any ideas/alternatives I am missing