Fox Shock - Needle ...
 

[Closed] Fox Shock - Needle bearing upgrade

 kevj
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Has anyone any experience with the needle bearing upgrade offred by BETD?

I need a new DU bushing for my RP32 anyway and looking at the blurb, the bearing seems to do this job at the same time??

[url= http://www.mountainbikecomponents.co.uk/items.asp?CategoryID=231&Name=Fox+Needle+Roller+Bearing ]Or am I wrong ??[/url]


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:20 am
Posts: 5941
Full Member
 

Mine fell to bits after 6 months winter riding. Replaced it with a TF Strong bush.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:27 am
 gazc
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mine also fell to bits... ๐Ÿ™ got hula hoops and their strong bushes now with no problems


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:29 am
 sv
Posts: 2815
Full Member
 

+1 for the strong bush.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:30 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Pointless, don't bother. No noticable difference on a BOS shock switching between needle bearings & normal bushes, other than with normal bushes I didn't have almost immediate play in the back end.

Almost as much of a gimmick as these spring bearings doing the rounds at the moment.

I'm sure someone will be along in a minute to tell you they are the best thing ever & they could feel a 0.687% improvement in rear end suppleness whilst mincing round Peaslake though.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:37 am
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

Seemed bizzarely popular on turners last time the question poped up.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 with using the strong bush and hula hoops, get the fitting tool at same time.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:39 am
Posts: 5941
Full Member
 

Mine was on a turner. Like I said, fell to bits.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:40 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Better off with a polymer eyelet bush TBH


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:45 am
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

It's not pointless. Really immediately noticeable, much much less stiction. Small bumps go from being dulled to being completely erased. Think this depends how much bushing rotation there is on your bike though.

THe only arse ache is that you need to get one that fits properly as often the eyelets aren't perfectly sized on the shock.

(Mine was from [url= http://www.enduroforkseals.com/id275.html ]Real WOrld Cycles/Enduro[/url] and had decent rubber seals which I don;t think the BETD ones do).

Not sure how it could fall to bits TBH. If there's play it means either it is the wrong size, or it was fitted badly.

I personally think it's only worthwhile doing if you need to improve small bump performance.

LoCo - Member

Better off with a polymer eyelet bush TBH

Do they perform better than normal bushings or just last longer?


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 11:53 am
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Slighlty lower 'stiction' and better life span, supplier quotes 'up to 4 times as long' as the standard eyelet bushings.
Use by the Loco BM Endurance team confirms them to last considerably longer than standard in 'real world' conditions. ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 12:07 pm
Posts: 1748
Free Member
 

Yep - I can confirm this ๐Ÿ™‚ I seem to batter my bushings, but the ones LoCo put on my race bike have stood up to a proper hammering. (in perspective, 15 - 18 hours a week usually).


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 21633
Full Member
 

Is it just me or does putting one on a Turner seem a bit ironic? One bike that stands out for making a jornal bearing work well instead of a rolling element bearing and then people put one of these on.

Tickles me a little.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Onzadog - Member
Is it just me or does putting one on a Turner seem a bit ironic? One bike that stands out for making a jornal bearing work well instead of a rolling element bearing and then people put one of these on.

Tickles me a little.

I run a RWC needle bearing on my 5 Spot.
It has been on for the 7 months I have owned the frame, it came with it, so I guess it would have had plenty of use when Toons owned it.
The only benefit I seem to get is as retro83 says, small bump compliance and less stiction.
The Turner does run journal bearings, but they are greased via the fitted zerks, so in theory the point of highest resistance is the shock eyelets, being a friction fit.
Having a grease packed needle bearing with less contact area than the bush can only give less resistance, so an improvement.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 4:40 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

The only benefit I seem to get is as retro83 says, small bump compliance and less stiction.

It has been on for the 7 months I have owned the frame, it came with it


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 4:42 pm
Posts: 21633
Full Member
 

I've got a HL 6 Pack myself. I can see the advantage. I just find it slightly amusing that these seem to be used by Turnewr riders more than anyone else. The best exection of jornal bearings on a bike I've ever seen.


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon - Member

The only benefit I seem to get is as retro83 says, small bump compliance and less stiction.

It has been on for the 7 months I have owned the frame, it came with it

Have I been owned by the grammar police?


 
Posted : 30/06/2011 4:52 pm