Forum menu
Fed up of remote tr...
 

[Closed] Fed up of remote trail centres

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

globalti - Member

I have never understood the attraction of trial centres

1) corners
2) jumps
3) consistent level of challenge - my wife hates 'natural' trails as they're often either boring, or too difficult. Bridleways/footpaths/cheeky trails are rarely fun AND easy. A trail centre offers XXkm of consistently challenging fun.

there's no point arguing, because you'll be arguing with my wife, so you'll be wrong as soon as you start.

even the peak district, held up as an example of the best of mountain biking, has very few bridleways. and very few of them are any good, and linking up the good bits without too many road miles is almost impossible.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 11:53 am
Posts: 31100
Full Member
 

[i]=[/i] [b]:[/b]87[b])[/b]


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 12:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OP wants to think himself lucky he doesn't surf.

Nearest break to me is two hours drive away, imagine the frustration of getting there and it's flat!!!!! ๐Ÿ˜ˆ


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 41869
Free Member
 

ahwiles +1

'natural' stuff is good
'trail center' stuff is also good

The difference is TC stuff is consistenty good, not a good bit at the end of a 10mile hike a bike accross a bog, up a hillside, ride down the tarmac road to apreciate a 100meter section of singletrack nirvana.

I have never experienced type 2 or 3 fun (google it) at a trail center, whereas a natural ride isn't complete without some!


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 12:14 pm
 Del
Posts: 8282
Full Member
 

Some observations:
1) The FC have built trails for us to ride with little or no cost to us ( other than as taxpayers and CP fees ). Their own studies show that riders who look for more technical stuff, red or above, are a very small minority of their visitors. frankly i'm amazed that red or above stuff gets built any more. study was linked off here ages ago. i don't know why the FC are to blame for the situation the OP is unhappy about really. surely if you want stuff built local to town/cities then it's the council who will have the most available land nearby?
2) how often do you see kids playing in the street, let alone out on their bikes? when i were a kid ( and all this fields, etc. ) there were gangs of us marauding about the place all year round. in many ways it's easy for parents to have their kids sat in front of the tv or games console of their choice. at least they're not the victims of the apparently ubiquitous peado. ๐Ÿ™„ ( sorry - legitimate concerns in some respects I know ).
3) i did have a computer at home and still got out on my bike.
4) a lot of kids you see going to and from school under their own steam seem to have those stupid scooter things. every time i see one i want to shout 'stop wasting your time and get a fracking bike!', but this sort of behaviour is frowned upon, i'm told. scooters and bikes appear ( anecdotally ) to have similar levels of popularity. go figure. ๐Ÿ™„ if your mates aren't in to it, you're not likely to be in to it either.
5) our local trail centre, haldon, is accessible from the centre of exeter in ~ 40mins via cycle path and relatively quiet country lanes. i can only guess at the numbers who ride up there, but i'd be surprised if it was more than 20-30 people a week.
6) the tow path along the canal/estuary is irritatingly busy during the summer. not so in winter, but still a fair ( and growing ) number of commuters. maybe there just aren't many cyclists in the frozen wastelands of scotland? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's cheaper to live in the countryside in NE Scotland. I choose to live next to Bennachie and Pitfichie and I now have a 45 minute commute to Dyce. The alternative is paying 40% more in rent and being nowhere near the trails.
Move to a nice cheap rented cottage in the Grantown area and commute into Inverness for work.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 1:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There's loads of good local stuff in and around the area. Easy enough to find the trails on strava.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 2:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

5thElefant - Member
Move?

The trails?


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Meaning the "unofficial" trails of course ... ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 3:16 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Having just encountered this thread for the first time, im quite frankly staggered at how lazy and selfish the OPs post seems.
Ive never been to a tail centre, although Im quite happy to go at some point and can completely understand their existance.
However, MTB (for me) is about getting out and exploring, finding those nuggets of local trails and getting out there. To complain that purpose built facilities aren't on peoples doorsteps highlights the fact that people expect the moon on a stick these days to participate in any sort of activity.
However you dont NEED to go to trail centre to ride an MTB. To think otherwise is quite saddening.
Yes we should be grateful that trail centres exist, but moreso that we are able to ride outside of such locations without serious restrictions.
Im really lucky to be in the countryside within 10 minutes of riding on the road, but if I want to go to a trail centre, I've got a ferry trip to contend with before I can even start my drive to the nearest one.
Much like cars, trail centres are a luxury, not a right. They're certainly NOT a necessity.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 3:21 pm
Posts: 6131
Full Member
 

Plus the kids we need to be getting out there simply never get the opportunity to ride these places.

No different to any other sport, needs parents to get them out and about.
My son raced bmx and rowed for a number of years, we were on the road most weekends taking him and his team mates to events.
Having helped start a now defunct kids bike club I have found too many parents just want(need)to dump their kids so that they can go shopping, to the gym, pool etc. The club folded partly due to lack of volunteers ie parents!!


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 4:33 pm
Posts: 4066
Full Member
 

I have a few thoughts on the points raised in this thread...
[u]
1) There aren't enough "Trail centres" close to town(s)[/u]
More trail centres are better right? Well..Yes and No.
Yes - Trail Centres are accesible as they provide a gateway into Mountain Biking (ie riding a bike offroad). This is a good thing. The more places there are to ride bikes in relative close proximity to town the better. Also learning to Mountain Bike in environment where there probably isn't a Rooty Drop of Death (tm) is likely to increase confidence and progression. Nothing like being dragged down some techfest natural trail to scare off the beginner.
Also not everyone wants to slog across 10 miles of moorland to get to the sublime mile of singletrack.

No - The more trail centres there are the more likely it is that Rights of Way will be restructured to exclude Mountain Bikes from existing ROWs. Unlikely but possibly worth keeping in mind.

[u]2) When I were a lad...[/u]
Yes, yes, you disappeared into the woods for hours or days on end to ride your bike. Kids still do this. However The culture of fear and the nanny state-ism of present day certainly reduces the numbers of kids allowed to experience this type of freedom.
Also getting the Xbox generation off their bum is hard enough but the promise of pies/cake/coke at the end of the ride (that is clearly defined and FUN) will help.

[u]3) OS Maps [/u]
Yep - lovely things, bloody useful, I can read one but many can't should lack of Nav skills be an impediment to learning to Mountain Bike? I don't think so.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 4:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Having helped start a now defunct kids bike club I have found too many parents just want(need)to dump their kids so that they can go shopping, to the gym, pool etc. The club folded partly due to lack of volunteers ie parents!!

This is quite interesting. Is the ratio of "staff" to kids so high now that setting up and running new clubs is harder, simply because it needs more people? I used to get involved in all sorts, from Scouts to fencing to hockey to orchestras etc. I don't recall there being that many adults required to look after the kids. Maybe times have changed.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 5:02 pm
Posts: 4066
Full Member
 

I think insurance (and you will be wanting insurance) dictates a minimum Kid to Parent Ratio.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 5:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If the op feels so very strongly about having facilities on his doorstep perhaps it is time for him to pull his finger out and do something about it...

I agree with this to a point.

I've been involved to some level (one a lot, another minimal) with two trail centres, and it's incredibly rewarding to see something grow and get used. [i]However[/i], the paperwork, money, politics and other related ball-aches are hard work, no two ways about it. You'll be dealing with land-owners, the rich public, the poor public, passionate riders and downright facking idiots, and they'll all have an opinion which they sincerely believe is right. I have banged heads more times than I care to remember, and I'm not a confrontational person.

This is before getting into the long, hard work of making sustainable trails - very different to making a cheeky trail in the woods, and keeping a motivated dig team is a mission in itself.

Definitely do it - it's utterly brilliant - but don't expect to see results quickly.


 
Posted : 10/12/2013 5:25 pm
Page 3 / 3