Forum menu
Enlighten me: whats...
 

[Closed] Enlighten me: whats the difference between a compact and a double chainset?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3790630]

Stupid question I know (if you know the answer), but whats the difference?


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 11:52 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Double: 53/39

Compact: 50/34

Usually, you can get other ratios.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:04 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20124
Full Member
 

They're both double (i.e. two chainrings), but a 'normal' double usually has a 53/39 tooth rings and a compact 50/34. For the average punter a compact is probably more suitable for general riding around.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:04 pm
Posts: 966
Free Member
 

if you live in holland go for a standard 53/39. if you live somewhere with hills, go for compact


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:06 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

My winter bike has a compact, summer has a standard double. Having been on the winter bike and recently changed to the summer I think I prefer the compact, always used to prefer the double.

Just find myself up the top of the block in the big ring, or changing down to the inner and being at the other end of the block. Compact you can just keep it in the big ring 90% of the time.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

so they have different number of teeth/ratios?


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:22 pm
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

Compact is 110mm BCD (bolt circle diameter - same as old MTB), normal road double is 130 BCD.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:23 pm
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

so they have different number of teeth/ratios?

In effect yes - the smallest inner ring you could fit on a normal double (130 BCD) would be 39 tooth, the smallest ring on a compact will be 34 tooth. Usually a compact will have a bigger gap between small and big ring, so give a bigger range of gears, but with less 'continuity' between them.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:26 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20124
Full Member
 

[i]so they have different number of teeth/ratios?[/i]

Yes. Compacts are lower geared than normal doubles, so better for those with normal, rather than racer, leg muscles.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:27 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

In effect yes - the smallest inner ring you could fit on a normal double (130 BCD) would be 39 tooth, the smallest ring on a compact will be 34 tooth

Not quite, you can get a 38t on a 130mm BCD, and a 33t on a 110mm, but yes.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:35 pm
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

Oh yes you're right - I was "top of my head"-ing ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:40 pm
 was
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Double / Triple refers to the number of chainrings (2 or 3)

Compact or non compact refers to the size of the chainrings.

A compact has smaller rings as above.

You can get doubles and triples in both compact and non compact.


 
Posted : 20/03/2012 12:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thread resurrection!!

Right about to pull the trigger on a SRAM Force chainset. And the options are (as stated above):

Double: 53:39
Compact: 50:34

My current road bike has a triple 52:42:30 and i hardly use the small ring, and spend most of the time in the big ring (obviously on the road). I am thinking I could actually go bigger than the 52 as sometimes i feel I need a little more so should I go for a 53:39?

EDIT: I suppose I need to consider what casette I am going to use too?

One thing to consider though is that this is for a cross bike, which I will also use for commuting. So will the 53:39 limit me in any way off road? Not sure what the size of my MTB triple is? prob 22/32/44 or 24/34/44? Spend most of the time in the middle ring on that set up.


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:06 pm
Posts: 17447
Full Member
 

my cx bike has a 34x27 lowest and I have had to get off and push on a few hills that I can ride up on a mtb with a 22x27 granny...


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The other thing you need to think about is that your MTB (probably) has 26" wheels, effectively lowering the gearing.

It's best if you work it out in Gear Inches using a handy calculator

http://sheldonbrown.com/gears/


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Doubles are for men
Compacts are for girls.


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

definitely a girl then,can't you see the breasts....
or are they moobs


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:30 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
 

A double is what I have.

A compact is what I'll be wishing for in the latter half of the Virgin Money Cyclone in June...


 
Posted : 13/04/2012 9:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

so what should I get for a bike that will mainly be my commuter, but I may give it the odd shot offroad?

I am now swaying towards compact but worried that I will need bigger ring up front as my 52 leaves me wanting more on the road, but I guess if I am running cross tyres these will slow me down a bit.

My road bike current has 12-25 cassette, what are typical for crossbikes, and what will give me more power if I drop from a 52 to a 50 upfront?


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 8:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Get a compact with an 11 tooth instead of a 12 tooth cassette.


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 9:08 am
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thats what I built my road bike up as

compact double with 11 tooth cassette, makes sense to me


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 1:42 pm
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

Buy a compact - if you can spin out 50/12 then you should be getting sponsored.


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 1:49 pm
Posts: 20658
Full Member
 

For a CX bike, compact. For a road bike, double.
IMHO


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 2:05 pm
 Goz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You're all wrong! the correct cross configuration is 46 - 38 with a 12 -27, 11 -28 or 11 -25.


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 4:15 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Get a standard, you can ride all day in 39. If the hills are too hard change the cassette to a 27 max.

I never like what 'seems' like a big drop from 50 into 34

My winter bike has a compact, summer has a standard double. Having been on the winter bike and recently changed to the summer I think I prefer the compact, always used to prefer the double.

You say that now, but I think the change is always horrible. I used to swap but bit the bullet and went standard on all bikes.


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 4:28 pm
 Haze
Posts: 5445
Free Member
 

Compact with 11-25 here, works well for me.


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 4:32 pm
Posts: 6678
Free Member
 

Compact for me sportives and racing. I have a 12:27 on the back too. I've never reached the point where I thought I needed higher gears, I'd have to be over 50mph and still trying to accelerate! I find it much easier and faster to spin up hills rather than grind (coming from mtbing).

I'm no where near as strong, fit or as quick as a pro so I'm not sure why I would want the same gearing.

I can keep up on most grop rides riding a cross bike with a 46 at the front. Fine today, even touching 40mph.


 
Posted : 14/04/2012 5:59 pm