Dialled Bikes PA 29
 

[Closed] Dialled Bikes PA 29

Posts: 3722
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just seen the photo on The Bike Chain's facebook page. Just a PSA for you 29er types, that's all.


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 8:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

PS - it's actually a 30.9 seatpost!


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 8:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

linky


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 8:44 pm
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

'proper' BB shell? What's an improper one?


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 8:46 pm
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

That's a brilliant product photo. Love it. Well done.

WHAT'S THE CHAINSTAY LENGTH?


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 8:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ace, Ti version?


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 8:56 pm
Posts: 510
Free Member
 

Geo?


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 8:57 pm
Posts: 41786
Free Member
 

WHAT'S THE CHAINSTAY LENGTH?

pffffftttttt, everyone know knows 29er handling is defined by ratio of headtube length to BB width.


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 9:05 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Yep it's a 30.9 seat post. My eyes need re-calibrated.

Normal BB shell = one where you are not forced to use a plastic one that fails in Scotland prematurely. This lets you select your own system. We like this.

Chainstays, no idea. Useless measurement taken on its own so best let Mike publish the geo tables in due course.


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 9:11 pm
Posts: 24436
Full Member
 

WHATS THE CHAINSTAY LENGTH

email from Mike
It's based on a 100mm fork with 71/74 angles and 445mm stays. 120mm will work fine too and slacken things off a little.

It will also take 30.9mm dropper posts.

was hoping for shorter stays ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 9:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is just a prototype. I'm massively behind schedule on all things Dialled at the moment as I've been focussing on getting Factory Team Bikes up and running.

Stays are 445mm, Brant.


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 9:22 pm
 timc
Posts: 2509
Free Member
 

rOcKeTdOg - Member
was hoping for shorter stays

How much shorter?


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 3358
Free Member
 

I'm so glad it isn't a crappy press fit BB. They're terrible


 
Posted : 04/12/2012 11:12 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Agreed zerocool. Regardless of what manufacturers seem to think and say, they just do not last long enough.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 10:57 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

Id love to see EBB sized BBs on more frames to make SSing a vertical drop out frame easier. Also wouldnt the increased surface area of the shell improve the stiffness of the BB area or even allow for flared tubes?


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 11:02 am
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

The thing is, it's not like anyone is making bendy bikes with normal style shells.

Sure, the manufacturers keep making out that there is tons more stiffness but is it really noticeable in every day use? Hard to say when there is 'control' sample to test against.

And this stiffness seems to come at the expense of practical everyday function like BB's that last more than 3 months. No use having a stiff bike if the BB doesn't go round.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 11:09 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

true - noddliness isnt everywhere.
How much to EBB adaptors cost anyway?


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 11:11 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

EBBs are A Good Thing.

Dialled know how to make them too, my Love/Hate works well.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Press fit BBs, not for me thanks.

Had them on BMX bikes for decades and they were a pain in the ass. What's wrong with the current threaded external BB systems?


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 4:28 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

Any plans for a love/hate 29er?


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 4:47 pm
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Still the nicest dropouts in the bizzniss.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 4:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Still the nicest dropouts in the bizzniss

I guess it's a marmite thing... personally the only reason I wouldn't buy a PA is the dropouts are so fugly...


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 5:01 pm
 LoCo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't need another hardtail, however..


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 5:09 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

going to add, that when i heard it was going to be brown and a raw one i really wanted raw. However, the brown is realll nice.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 5:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like the dropouts, but beyond the looks (I appreciate other dropouts might look prettier), they actually have a practical purpose. They do away with needed to weld disc mounts to the seat stay and the reinforcing brace between the SS and CS on the brake side (which I don't like the look of). Never had a CS or a SS crack/break due to breaking forces (which I've seen happen on other frames), so the fugly dropouts seem to be doing their job.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 6:38 pm
Posts: 648
Free Member
 

I really like the drop outs, maybe it's cause I don't like marmite.
TheBikeChain you should stick to the raw finish.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 6:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was in TBC today picking something up and that brown finish is lovely.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 6:49 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

AntM was in at closing time and we have renamed it Cortina Brown.


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 7:46 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Alpine 29er please


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 8:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the fugly dropouts seem to be doing their job

Fair enough Mike - function over fashion is the way it should be.

While we are asking questions I have another: is there a functional reason why the seat stays join the seat tube above the top tube junction rather than in line with it? Or is it just a visual thing? Seems like quite a few bikes seem to have that style these days.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 3:49 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

increased standover whilst still keeping a nice big (and stiff) rear triangle, I thought.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldn't have thought it would make a noticeable difference to rear end stiffness would it?


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 4:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't need another hardtail, however..

Same here...

Glad post is 30.9 - the 31.6 on my current HT is a little harsh after a few hours.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
 

is there a functional reason why the seat stays join the seat tube above the top tube junction rather than in line with it? Or is it just a visual thing? Seems like quite a few bikes seem to have that style these days.

Its something I've never been keen on. I'm sure it is strong enough, but it doesn't look right from a load-distribution point of view.

increased standover whilst still keeping a nice big (and stiff) rear triangle,

hmmm, how much increase in standover? half an inch? Solved by wearing tighter pants.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 4:19 pm
Posts: 8839
Full Member
 

How small is that whiteboard?!

Oh, 29er...


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 4:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think the seat stays higher than top tube concept originated in Canada and were dubbed "Bomber style stays".

On my frames they're only about 19mm higher, but I've seem them higher on other frames. Only real functional/practical advantage is that the welds aren't as close together as they would be if the TT and SS were at the same level. Nothing to do with how the frame rides or handles.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 4:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mike, will you be offering an EBB on a 29er?


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Will have to see how things go. If the PA29 does alright, I might expand the 29er range.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 5:21 pm
 Rik
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

You not making the Ti PA 26" then that the bike chain had proto's of?


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 7:46 pm
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

Nah - far too much money to put into production at the scale the factories want.

Nice project though.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 7:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do you have any pics with a bike built up, and when will you be taking orders?


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 9:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lovely.

Can we have a 650B Alpine also please Mike?


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rik, The Bike Chain prototypes were titanium Alpines, and no, production isn't going ahead. Not enough interest.

What's wrong with a 26" Alpine, Adrian?

Rewski, will probably start taking orders on PA29 in Jan.


 
Posted : 08/12/2012 3:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good question; I'm 6'2" and the biggest Alpine is a bit small for my liking... I'm running a Love/Hate at the minute with 100mm stem and a setback post.... wouldn't want any less reach even for the different riding style of an Alpine. Figure a 650b "hardcore hard tail" would be spot on for folks my size.


 
Posted : 08/12/2012 7:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mike, thanks, sent you a mail via info@dialled.


 
Posted : 09/12/2012 10:45 am
Posts: 40
Free Member
 

Now if you can make a version with a 142x12 flavour rear end.....


 
Posted : 09/12/2012 11:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Any news on when/if the PA29 is arriving?


 
Posted : 19/03/2013 12:57 pm
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

bump


 
Posted : 31/03/2013 9:35 am
Posts: 3032
Free Member
 

So how will it stand up against the solaris or the skookum?

And do they do it in anything else other that Austin Allegro Metallic brown?


 
Posted : 31/03/2013 10:50 am
Posts: 920
Free Member
 

So how will it stand up against the solaris or the skookum?

Dno but I do know I prefer the ride of my Love/Hate, which I've kept, to my Mk2 Soul, which I didn't. (I think I'll get excommunicated from cotictrackworld.com now).

And do they do it in anything else other that Austin Allegro Metallic brown?

Quite liking the clear coat myself.


 
Posted : 31/03/2013 12:01 pm
 timc
Posts: 2509
Free Member
 

still no news?


 
Posted : 04/04/2013 7:54 pm
Posts: 4056
Full Member
 

Picked this thread up off a google search. Love the colours on dialled website (raw (still going ahead after the Alpine colour debacle?) and metallic coffee) but not overly sure about the 71/74 angles.

Even with a 120mm fork it'll end up being about 70/73, which whilst isn't super steep, I'd like to see a touch slacker at the front.

After having a look at some of the Gnarfriendly 29er HTs, it seems 68/73 angles with 17.1 chainstays seem to be about average.


 
Posted : 14/05/2013 12:13 pm
 timc
Posts: 2509
Free Member
 

no point guessing mate


 
Posted : 14/05/2013 12:21 pm