[Closed] Cyclist / cycle lane / "road rage" video

He was pulled over for riding dangerously, which he seems incapable of understanding, seemed abit of an arse to me.

Lucky to have been stopped by Michael Caine. 🙂

His move didn't seem [i]that[/i] bad to me, but from the camera angle it's hard to know what's going on to his side and how much of a shoulder check and indication he gave.

If it wasn't much then I can see why he was pulled.

The officer needs one of these...

[img] [/img]

Also shouldn't this be in the Bike Forum? Someone call a mod.

Don't think either come out of that looking great!!

Typical twonk who just rides where he wants with no consideration for others. Weve got the best cycle paths between Dorking and Leatherhead, but you still get these weapons riding on the dual carrigeways....boils my piss! 👿

His move didn't seem that bad to me,

That's partly why I posted it. I couldn't work out what the copper was objecting to so strongly, whilst managing to ignore both the drag-racing scooters at the lights and the blue van that pulled out into the path of the cyclists causing them all to brake hard. I wondered if it was just me being blind / the camera viewpoint.

The copper's behaviour was deplorable though, clearly trying to intimidate him. Asking his name, then backpedalling when he realised the cyclist knew he didn't have to tell him unless he was being detained. And was all the horn blasting the copper as well? Reckon I'd have been a bit "what's your problem" in that situation too.

Pretty embarrassing for the copper all round, I reckon.

London is shite.

He can ride the road if he wants (isn't it rec that you "should" if you're doing over 15 mph or something ?)

he did seem to swing over as the copper was alongside him, though, which is shit riding

one-all

Also shouldn't this be in the Bike Forum? Someone call a mod.

I considered it, but I don't go in there very often. I should probably move it I suppose.

Weve got the best cycle paths between Dorking and Leatherhead, but you still get these weapons riding on the dual carrigeways....boils my piss!

Why? Would you object to someone driving in the second lane of a two-lane road when there's a perfectly good first lane everyone should all be crammed into? It's exactly the same situation.

Interesting one.

He wasn't stopped for not using the cycle superhighway, he was stopped because the copper wanted to warn him that his riding was potentially dangerous.

You can't tell whether he checked or signalled before he pulled out into the traffic, or whether it was safe to do so. You could infer from the coppers reaction that he hadn't done so and shouldn't have done so. He should certainly have heard the copper telling him to pull over before the blue lights went on, and that is always going to piss off a copper. The police car was there for long enough that I would have made sure my riding was squeaky clean, the same way I'm extra careful driving near a Police car.

He certainly seemed more intent on "making progress" than being careful and considerate to other cyclists and road users - he seemed to squeeze past the other cyclist as he went through the first set of lights.

Seems to me that an entitled attitude and a need for speed have had their noses put out by a copper offering a word of advice.* I wouldn't have posted that for all to see, I'd not expect much sympathy.

*There's a few car drivers who could do with the same treatment, just so long as we are all equal in the eyes of the law.

Watch the video again - the actual incident that starts this is earlier than you expect and it's not really his failing to join the lane that the Police objects to.

This starts at 1.33 - another cyclist overtakes as the lights change and the Police gives them the horn. The cyclist who gets pulled over gives him a 'Calm down mate'.

It wasn't an appropriate use of the horn - people in cars forget how loud a car horn is. At c1m out of the car it's damned unpleasant.

HelmetCam then doesn't join the off road section but you can already hear the Police giving him verbal by then (which is probably why he misses the 'on ramp' to the off road cycleway which is pretty short and easy to do there if you're worrying about someone too close on your right side)

The impatience here is the driver of that Police car - he's the one who needed to leave some space for the junction to clear of cyclists before pulling off.

I think you're on the money there.

[i]He wasn't stopped for not using the cycle superhighway, he was stopped because the copper wanted to warn him that his riding was potentially dangerous.[/i]

I think - that's what the copper [i]said[/i] , but in truth he's stopped him because he [i]objected to a cyclist getting in his way.[/i] Like so many other dicks in cars do.

simons_nicolai-uk +1

The first blast of the horn was unnecessary but aimed at the rider in front who did make a bit of a daft move.

Maybe the officer got confused and thought the guy he stopped was that first rider?

But if you seen someone do something daft in front of you then you don't just blast your horn at them. I don't know why the officer thought the cyclist needed to be aware of his presence unlessf "being aware" means "get out of my way".

I can't see from the video what the rider has done wrong there. He may have been impatient, but he didn't appear to endanger himself or anyone else.

The cop's attitude of "one of these days you're going to..." really has no relevance to what's taken place in that film. That the guy is heading for an accident at some unseen point in the future may well be his opinion, but I'm not sure that's a sound basis for pulling him over and then trying to intimidate him by fetching his notebook. Fair play to the guy for politely standing his ground.

Don't like the whole "you should be in the cycle lane" attitude, least of all from the police who should know better.

Hard to tell.

If the cyclist moved into his lane with little or no indication or shoulder check (as I think the video suggests) then I can perfectly understand the copper being a bit miffed at him appearing from nowhere on his nearside, in a position with limited visibility, when there are plenty of other things happening on the road to concentrate on.

Bearing in mind that copper may have scraped up one of more ex-cyclists in his time I can also understand him being a bit hostile to someone who doesn't seem to take is warning seriously.

If the cyclist moved into his lane with little or no indication or shoulder check (as I think the video suggests)

But then he would say that...

If he did one then it must have been a pretty quick glance.

Personally if I spotted a police car on my outside then I wouldn't pull out just in front of it, well inside its stopping distance, and expect the driver to brake for me without some comment.

It seems to me that the rider took to the road because he needed Lane 3 to go straight on at the junction. Perfectly legal and legitimate.

I don't know what he did that was dangerous.

I'm still shocked they were all stopping at red lights !

Can't see what he did that warranted getting pulled over by the police, unless he pulled out without looking?

He's in a hurry for sure, but it's London rush hour and everyones in a hurry no matter what form of transport they are using.

It seems to me that the rider took to the road because he needed Lane 3 to go straight on at the junction.

He didn't need to do that - the Superhighway went straight on as well.

I'm still shocked they were all stopping at red lights !

I used to ride that route 2-3 times a week before the new CSH went in. Contrary to popular belief/made-up nonsense, those red lights are very widely respected at that point and rarely jumped. You'd be jumping into pretty heavy traffic coming up from Camberwell...

The Policeman needs to spend some time riding in London before he goes around passing out advice - riding on the highway is entirely legal and there's no requirement to be in the cycle lane... I watched the cycling bit but not the 'having a chat' bit and I couldn't see what was wrong with the cyclist's riding at all. Once he was out of the CSH he couldn't get back in - there's a raised kerb all the way along... he'd have had to stop dead in the moving traffic to lift his bike over, which is dangerous.

Police need to have a word with the SUV driver who pulled right out into moving traffic if they want to make the roads safer...

Well that was a bit shocking to be honest, calling a blue stripe with buses, cars and pedestrians crossing over it randomly a superhighway is a bit bollocks. I think superhighways should be high speed and uninterrupted, and capacity for loads of people to use it simultaneously like the Information Superhighway. That blue stripe is more Cycle Dialup, it's not even Cycle Broadband.

Broess - if you had watched the chat bit you would have discovered that the policeman didn't say he couldn't use the road - the title is misleading.

I think superhighways should be high speed and uninterrupted, and capacity for loads of people to use it simultaneously

Give it time. This junction used to be a complete lottery, heart in mouth moment (taking the route this cyclist ended up taking on the road). It's massively better now - you join that first section of off road cycleway and the adrenaline levels immediately start to fall. It's not perfect but it's lovely.

Look at Steinsky's recent posts on Twitter - some of the new stuff is really pretty good. In time it will join up.

https://twitter.com/steinsky/status/722890259243995136/photo/1

https://twitter.com/steinsky/status/722884819101716480/photo/1

https://twitter.com/steinsky/status/722879150739079168/photo/1

Broess - if you had watched the chat bit you would have discovered that the policeman didn't say he couldn't use the road - the title is misleading.

This is STW - the opinion comes before the typing 🙂

I'm not going to watch it, the copper will be wrong, theyre all nobheads in my experience.

At 1:40 he basically cuts the corner, veering from inside to middle of the lane, with the cop car already alongside him. Obviously we don't know if he shoulder-checked and signalled, but can't imagine the copper would be that impressed by that manoeuvre, cycle lane or no cycle lane.

Then he gets arsey/dismissive with the officer, with predictable results.

At 1:40 he basically cuts the corner, veering from inside to middle of the lane, with the cop car already alongside him

Look at the path the car in front is taking (which is the path all motor vehicles normally take). The paint takes you very wide (sensibly) but there are no marked lanes and the blue isn't bounded by white - it has no status at all. The only reason the Police car is so close to him a few seconds later is because the officer is already giving him hassle.

[img] [/img]

Meh London, who really cares?

That's the problem with the blue area - it's not really wide enough for two abreast unless cars give proper room to the RH rider as they should normally. But because it's a 'cycle lane', the design suggests you can get two lanes of cars passing continuously with no interaction between cyclists and cars, which isn't really the case.

I'm not sure the cop car was giving him hassle at that point - the rider moves out in the middle of 'lane 1' just after this still, with the police car, as you can see, already going for the overtake, and presumably squeezing him further out and/or making him brake.

It's more about changing road position safely than using/not using the superhighway.

I'm a law abiding citizen, robo cop doesn't come out of this very well, seems to have some beef with cyclists imho, the "superhighway" then seems to end a 100m further on, where a bus pulls over, so the cyclist has to move into the traffic anyway meh.

Weve got the best cycle paths between Dorking and Leatherhead

Are you sure about that?

In some places, particularly coming southwards, the surface is terrible, unless they have changed it in the last year.

Having watched the video in full now I'm afraid that copper handled it really badly - if he wasn't a copper, he'd just have been some ill-informed driver with an opinion having a go at someone because he didn't like what they did... he clearly understood nothing about the reality of riding in heavy traffic and that cyclists should ALWAYS be given room as there are always obstacles - potholes, paint, drain covers etc, and you shouldn't pass so close to a cyclist that you may hit them if they need to swerve for any reason.

If Police are going to go around telling cyclists how to ride then they need to be given some training so they have some perspective and pick people up when they're really riding badly, not stuff like this - needing to ride wide like that in London happens several times in a ride out of necessity (pedestrians walking in front of you being a big reason) and Police need to understand that before they start having words with cyclists...

Interesting, copper claims to have been "police driving" for 30 years but still seems to struggle with forward planning and anticipation which are the hallmarks of an advanced driver. Also, like so many drivers, perfectly capable of reaching the horn but unable to apply the brake.

Yes, the cyclists ride might not have been perfect, but clearly from the coppers attitude, he things all cyclists are clueless on the road.

Wonder when the last time was he had a similar conversation with a car driver for a similar manoeuvre.

I'm of the opinion that the lad was only pulled over because he told the copper to 'calm down mate'. First thing he said when he got out of the car was 'I'm not your mate'. He then proceeded to be rather condescending in tone (I'm assuming the cyclist was relatively young). Possible indication that the copper felt a bit stung, then looked for any reason to try and get back at the lad. Seemed a bit of a bullying arse to me. And if he's so concerned about road safety, then he should look at his own behaviour; he didn't bother to check behind his car, before going and opening the door to get his pocket book. That blue truck looked like it had to pull out into the oncoming lane to avoid him (and who as talking about ending up under a lorry? 😆 ). He got rather peeved when the cyclist challenged him on his driving. He's clearly not ridden a bike in heavy traffic. Sounding a horn at someone when there isn't immediate danger, is just stupid. And not allowing cyclists space and time is failing to drive according to the current road conditions.

What was achieved? Absolutely nothing. That 'listen to me sonny' (what his impending retirement has to do with anything I really do not know) speech was pointless; all it would have done is antagonise the cyclist. 30 years driving police cars and he hasn't yet learned how to speak to members of the public. Probably a good thing he's retiring.

I'm struggling to see what the cyclist did wrong there, but I'm not an experienced London cyclist.

Ok he came out of the cycle Lane when he could have slowed, but the copper was performing a dangerous over take, I suppose in mitigation the copper wouldn't expect that... And that's part of the issue with cycle lanes in this scenario, people expect bikes to stay in them.

If the roles were reversed and the cop had cut up the bike would we be defending the cop??!

His ridding fell below the standard. He was requested to stop. He ignored it. Went straight in with the attitude and got read his rights.

You're on your bike, you're an ambassador, set the standard.

"You're on your bike, you're an ambassador"

No you're not; you're just you, on your bike. Nothing else.

"His ridding fell below the standard"

Unless you have access to information the rest of us don't, how do you know this?

"Went straight in with the attitude and got read his rights."

Who, the copper?

There was an interesting comment in the (car) dashcam thread about how dashcams made their owners drive more carefully because they were aware of how things could look on film. The opposite seems to be true for cyclists with cameras - it appears to make people act like entitled tossers.

In this case, the rider joined the road in the police car's blind spot, effectively forcing plod to either swerve or brake. If cyclists want to campaign for drivers leaving a car-sized patch of road when overtaking cyclists (and we should all want this), you can't force your way into a 24" gap in someone else's lane.

If I were the copper, I'd have cited 'cycling furiously' as a reason to take his name down.

If Police are going to go around telling cyclists how to ride then they need to be given some training so they have some perspective and pick people up when they're really riding badly, not stuff like this

THIS

Not that above.

the rider joined the road in the police car's blind spot

I'm failing to see how this would be a problem to someone who had been a police driver for 30 years and was driving past a good number of cyclists. The cyclist wasn't perfect sure, but not anticipating that is shitty driving.

I'd have hung back and let them all go, cycle lane or no, then passed when it was safe to do so. I sure as hell wouldn't have done it through a junction.

the rider joined the road in the police car's blind spot

Have you ever ridden much in London? You spend most of your time passing static traffic - passing from blind spot to blind spot...

And to my point above - if the Policeman were properly trained about what is best practice cycling technique (Bikeability) and the way that cyclists will ride to keep themselves safe, then he would have also known that 'cycling furiously' wouldn't have stuck as a charge as all the cyclist was doing was riding along the carriageway, which isn't 'cycling furiously'

As far as I could tell from the video, the cyclist is parallel to the Police car when he chooses to move to the right and into the main road - essentially changing lanes.

Clearly the fat policeman is a clown who reached for the horn instead of the brake, but the cyclist doesn't have the moral high ground here either. The Policeman didn't pull him up for cycling badly (as above, he will have seen plenty of worse cyclist moves that day) he pulled him up for being gobby.

No you're not; you're just you, on your bike. Nothing else.

Yes you are. If you like it or not, your represent cyclist just by being on a bike on the road. How you behave on your bike directly influences how other road users see cyclist. Try not to ride like a nob.

Unless you have access to information the rest of us don't, how do you know this?

Who, the copper?

Is it your video clodhopper?

Car must be in the right here according to you clodhopper.

 

Weve got the best cycle paths between Dorking and Leatherhead, but you still get these weapons riding on the dual carrigeways....boils my piss!

Like a few others I can't let that slide! They're pretty shit. Loads of debris, bad surface, road crossings. Ok Spring/summer, but in winter it's one giant puddle, and in Autumn it's buried in leaves which can be lethal! I'll use the road if I damn well want!

This thread highlights a major downside to cycle lanes. Even some cyclists think you have to use one if it is there. If you want to ride at 20mph then the best place is not a cycle lane, it is on the road.

Most drivers probably think you are breaking the law by cycling on their road but you would hope most cyclists wouldn't...

Not commenting on this video directly, but I had an encounter with a poorly educated copper on Cable Street in East London recently.

on an evening CS3 (cycle lane) was very busy with cyclists riding very fast (too fast considering the width and number of other riders), a good number without lights, some on the wrong side of the dual lane at times or doing dangerous overtakes causing oncoming riders to brake or swerve.

I decided to ride on Cable Street which runs parallel to CS3, as I felt the cycle lane was unsafe.

Coming up to a junction (I am doing 20km/h) a copper yells at me "Oi! Green hat, come here" (I was wearing a green Giro helmet), so I slow down and stop.

Then proceeds to tell me I have no business riding on the road. As a cycle lane has been provided. I politely tell him what the highway code states, that I have considered CS3 dangerous, and I have a right of way to cycle on the highway.

He is having none of this, and continues to press his "case", I ask him why he is not stopping cyclists riding at night without lights (passing right next to him), he says nothing about that. He also fails to stop a motorist who has turned across the cycle path as we are talking...

He gets aggressive, starts calling me "Geez.."

I ask him for his badge number and station address, at that point he asks me to go about my business 😉

I think the problem is that the Police basically do what the daily mail reading, LBC listening idiots tell them to do, even when the thing they are complaining about is perfectly legal.

HH's point is why we should all be taking the PCC elections more seriously. They are potentially a chance to force roads policing higher up police priority list. Idealistic yes..but with UKIP putting up PCC candidates in some areas........

If the roles were reversed and the cop had cut up the bike would we be defending the cop??!

His ridding fell below the standard. He was requested to stop. He ignored it. Went straight in with the attitude and got read his rights.

You're on your bike, you're an ambassador, set the standard.

Is this a troll? I would guess he has never ridden a bicycle, I always swerve to miss potholes, pedestrians you name it, Car drivers have to anticipate this and the highway code makes provision for this by allowing us this room, I do not have the benefit of a rear view mirror on my bike, and am not about to put one on just to appease dumb car drivers.
That copper is what is wrong with the Met police. An ambassador I think was the term fourbanger used.
Does fourbanger refer to a car engine I wonder?

Yes you are. If you like it or not, your represent cyclist just by being on a bike on the road. How you behave on your bike directly influences how other road users see cyclist. Try not to ride like a nob.

No, No thrice no. Every time you go out as a woman how you behave directly influences how other people see women. Are you going to stand by that statement?

http://beyondthekerb.org.uk/2013/10/11/the-most-basic-respect/

Have you never heard a member of the public, colleague, associate, random on YouTube talk about "cyclists"?

You've literally just posted an article supporting my argument. Just because it's not how it should be and you don't like it, doesn't mean it isn't the case.

How you behave on your bike directly influences how other road users see cyclist.

TBH if we all rode like saints some car drivers would still hate us

Yes there are bad cyclist but lets not pretend all the hatred is just die to how we cycle. Car driving standards, cannot say for london, are far worse than any cycling I see and FAR more dangerous to other road users.

what do ya want mate?" Straight in with the attitude

With eight million arseholes in one toilet youre gonna get a lot of shit.

Copper's already got a monk on about the first guy then when laddo cuts him up (which he does) that's his excuse to get righteous

gummikuh, not trolling, just wondered if we watched the same video. I saw a cyclist give a copper some attitude, cut him up, fail to stop, then get what was coming. Copper could have handled it better. Cyclist could have avoided it altogether.

I cycled Waterloo to London Bridge yesterday. Managed to do it without jumping any red lights, cutting anyone up or causing any agro, so yeah I cycle.

Does fourbanger refer to a car engine I wonder?

Cougar - Moderator

the rider joined the road in the police car's blind spot

I'm failing to see how this would be a problem to someone who had been a police driver for 30 years and was driving past a good number of cyclists. The cyclist wasn't perfect sure, but not anticipating that is shitty driving.

It wasn't a problem for the police driver, hence why he didn't squash him. But as the officer pointed out to the cyclist, riding like that might end him up under someone elses wheel (the lorry). If you change lanes you should only do so if there is space.

Pulling out to overtake a slower cyclist into the path of an accelerating car (it was also pulling away from the lights) is a stupid move that cyclists in London seem to love doing.

Stand outside Kings cross on a visit to London and every phase of lights is filled with cyclists pulling stupid moves trying to overtake each other by diving out in front of the cars also trying to pull away. Given how much everyone says cabbies in London hate cyclists im amazed there isn't a fight every 5 minutes outside that place.

Yes one can hardly be more disrespectful to a copper than ask them why they stopped you.
Probably amongst the worst ways he has ever been spoken to by anyone.

If you want to pretend that the way he spoke wasn't confrontational that's fine. If I'd just swerved from lane to lane, cutting up a police car, it wouldn't be my opening line. Swerving into the police car's lane was confrontational and how he spoke was confrontational. All the other cyclist managed to hold their lane. He wanted confrontation and he got it.

Fourbanger; I think you are putting 2 and 2 together, and making 5, 6, 7 or whatever suits your own particular argument. Several other people see things differently. And we disagree with you. You are of course entitled to your point of view, as are we to ours.

"Yes you are. If you like it or not, your represent cyclist just by being on a bike on the road. How you behave on your bike directly influences how other road users see cyclist. Try not to ride like a nob."

Again; repeating this doesn't make it any more correct. It's just your own opinion. Personally, I represent nobody but myself, just as one Black/Jewish/Muslim/Gay/whatever person doesn't represent anyone else whatever group you may choose to put them in. A person on a bike is nothing more than an individual human being, and to see them as otherwise is to act with prejudice.

His ridding fell below the standard. He was requested to stop. He ignored it. Went straight in with the attitude and got read his rights.

Did we watch the same video?

The copper didn't "request him to stop," he leant on his horn and shouted some twaddle about cycle lanes, as far as I can tell primarily as a result of [i]someone else[/i] swerving out of the cycle lane. As soon as he fired up the blues and twos the cyclist stopped as soon as was (arguably) safe to do so. Big man in a big car hurling abuse, I'd have ignored him too. I've no time for bullies.

The copper then didn't read him anything, he went on a tirade of whataboutery and tried to intimidate the cyclist with threats about taking his name (which you're not obliged to comply with unless being detained). As soon as the policeman realised the rider wasn't about to bend over he sodded off.

And what "riding standard" exactly constituted him breaking the law?

Yes one can hardly be more disrespectful to a copper than ask them why they stopped you.

Seems a perfectly reasonable request to me, given that the evidence he'd provided to that point was "you're not in the cycle lane" which is pish (and the subsequent explanation was based on clairvoyance).

Don't like the whole "you should be in the cycle lane" attitude, least of all from the police who should know better.

Getting more of this now that some of the cycle lanes in central London are opening, I've already had some 'that's your bit and this is ours' comments while commuting. Some of the cycle traffic lights take ages to change and it's quicker to use the proper road.

As for the copper, some are great and some deserve the pig title, same as any other cross section of society.

PS; telling a traffic cop to 'lose the attitude mate' does not go down well, I know this 😀

Again; repeating this doesn't make it any more correct. It's just your own opinion. Personally, I represent nobody but myself, just as one Black/Jewish/Muslim/Gay/whatever person doesn't represent anyone else whatever group you may choose to put them in. A person on a bike is nothing more than an individual human being, and to see them as otherwise is to act with prejudice.

You make a valid point there. No one in the history of the world has ever been prejudice.... Apart from, to a greater or lesser extent, just about every human to have ever existed.

You may not like the fact that people are prejudice against all sorts of different groups with common traits, but they are.

You may see yourself as an individual who rides a bike, fantastic! Many people will see you as just another cyclist. If you chose to or not, if they meet you, you represent cyclists. This isn't something you get a choice in. This is the real world. How you behave on a bike has an influence on how people view and treat cyclists.

[i]Did we watch the same video?

The copper didn't "request him to stop," he leant on his horn and shouted some twaddle about cycle lanes, as far as I can tell primarily as a result of someone else swerving out of the cycle lane. As soon as he fired up the blues and twos the cyclist stopped as soon as was (arguably) safe to do so. Big man in a big car hurling abuse, I'd have ignored him too. I've no time for bullies.

The copper then didn't read him anything, he went on a tirade of whataboutery and tried to intimidate the cyclist with threats about taking his name (which you're not obliged to comply with unless being detained). As soon as the policeman realised the rider wasn't about to bend over he sodded off.

And what "riding standard" exactly constituted him breaking the law?[/i]

This.

The guy with the camera was in the cycle lane until after the police car sounded his horn. He seemed to move out of his lane as a result of the conversation with the copper. I thought the copper was sounding his horn at the other guy.

Dont call me mate

They are not his mate , thay are going to cost the poor guy points and pounds or crush his car, not the sort of actions a mate would do.

This copper is a ****, beeping his horn , then the two tones as a bike gets near his car , well welcome to London.

As for the ' There is abike lane , you must use it attitude ' get lost , its full of fat knackers on Decathlon hybrids doing 12mph

You may see yourself as an individual who rides a bike, fantastic! Many people will see you as just another cyclist. If you chose to or not, if they meet you, you represent cyclists. This isn't something you get a choice in. This is the real world. How you behave on a bike has an influence on how people view and treat cyclists.

You're right. The real world is full of ill-informed prejudiced people making negative, stereotyped judgements.

But where you wrong is whether we have a choice in this. We can't choose not to be the target of someone else's prejudice but we can choose to fight back and correct that prejudice. You may have noticed that the 20th century and esp the last 10 years or so, the fight back against prejudice has made some great progress: Jews, Blacks, Women, Gays, Disabled - all these communities have fought back and made progress...

So you can roll over and say 'some people judge cyclists, deal with it', or you can fight back. Remembering that at it's worst this prejudice has resulted in people being killed and their killers given no real punishment (read Martin Porter's recent piece about biased juries. It's also stopping a lot of people riding as they're too scared because of the poor quality and aggressiveness of driving...

So on the one hand you're right, cyclists get judged. But where we disagree is on whether we should accept that, or fight for positive change. Given the impact more people riding will have on mental health, pollution and obesity I think it's well worth fighting back. Let alone the fact that I just like riding my bike without being abused by idiots who can't cope with change..

And someone needs to have a word with that cop about reciprocity. If he goes around addressing members of the public so aggressively, he's going to get static back. Perhaps if his opening lines were a bit more adult he might get a better response! The cyclist was hardly some hardened criminal committing the crime of the century...

As a pedestrian, mountain biker & car driver in that order, I though the road rider was riding like a total b@llend weaving around like that.

I never suggested not fighting prejudice. I just said set the standard when it comes to how you use the road. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

Neither the cyclist or the policeman came out of that looking good.

The key thing for me, though, is that the policeman was happy to throw the weight of his 'authority' around, then backed off without issuing a fine or a caution, when he realised that he was losing the argument.

(Not helped by his completely unobservant behaviour whilst getting in/out of his own vehicle, and a poor understanding of the law, despite 30 years 'service')

ALL road users need to just wind their necks in - it's getting far to unpleasant out there.

Neither party came out of that well. Cyclist looked to be trying to prove a point to me; his manoeuvre seemed to either deliberately or otherwise take him too close to the police vehicle, which could be interpreted as provocative. Copper displayed typical arrogant copper attitude; they are so used to people either a) sucking up to them, or b) giving them verbal, that they struggle to respond to the middle ground that this was; someone sticking up for himself in a confident but possibly a little too bolshy a way. Neither handled the verbal very well, too much of both parties being convinced of their own correctness, and FAR too little of both parties listening to what the other has got to say. Militant cyclist meets dyed in the wool copper, went probably a little better than could be expected TBH.

1-1

If he cycled out without indicating he deserved to get pulled over. Any other road user would.

If he did, can't see a problem with his riding. Its not how I would personally ride but don't have an issue really with others doing it.

If he cycled out without indicating he deserved to get pulled over. Any other road user would.
If he did, can't see a problem with his riding. Its not how I would personally ride but don't have an issue really with others doing it.

Sort of agree, except the act of indicating is just that; an indication of intentions. It doesn't give the rider/driver an express right to carry out the manoeuvre, just lets other road users know what he/she would like to do.

Fair point as he could have just ridden straight into the path of the copper with or without his arm sticking out.

The only 'attitude' I can see is that of an arsey copper who just wants to throw his weight around for no reason. I do thousands of road miles a year, but commuting by bike in a city like that London just looks so shit that I doubt I'd bother. I'd rather take my chances in the traffic than plod along getting frustrated by all the nodders in the bike lane though.

If he cycled out without indicating he deserved to get pulled over. Any other road user would.

Sarcasm mode on / Oh yes , you see countless BMW's and Audi's getting stopped by the police everyday for not indicating at roundabouts or when lane changing on the motorway // Sarcasm mode off

The only 'attitude' I can see is that of an arsey copper who just wants to throw his weight around for no reason.

Bobby - you cycle like a dick and are going get yourself killed
Cyclist - you think I should be on the cycle path and shouldn't blow your horn at people
Bobby - I sounded my horn as per the Highway Code and have not said you should be on the cycle path, RESPEC' MA AUTHORITAH!
Cyclist - you think I should be on a cycle path and you shouldn't blow your horn at people
Bobby - RESPEC' MA AUTHORITAH!!!

Etc etc.

Both dicks. One more dangerous and should know better than the other, mind you