Can't get on w...
 

[Closed] Can't get on with Nobby Nic's...what to try next?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Been out round Rivington again w/Nobby Nic's...more pinch flats, dispite the tyres being pumped up pretty hard, think I've had enough of them. I like 'em, but I'm sick of pinch flats, what else can I try which are similar, but less prone to pinch flats?


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:44 am
Posts: 13850
Free Member
 

What type of NNs?

I've used the Evo Snakeskins on two bikes (well three, I sold a frame and replaced it) for about four years with hardly any punctures.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:54 am
Posts: 2607
Free Member
 

I'll give you some pounds for 'em... ๐Ÿ˜‰

What size are they? You might be better off getting the 2.4s if yours are smaller.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:55 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

What size tubes are you using? Are they being asked to fill a tyre that bigger than the recommended size for the tube?


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 12:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Think they 2.25's.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 12:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Go tubeless ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 12:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you like expensive tyres, I can recommend Conti Rubber Queens in black chilli, I've found them excellent over everything except tarmac where they're just a shade draggy.

I ditched my NN's earlier in the year. Wish I'd have done it sooner instead of persevering for as long as I did... so many great reviews and yet, I just could not get on with them!


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 8:06 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

Not really a fan of the NN either, at least not at full price, they wear stupidly fast and once the blocks have lost their edges they stop gripping.

Specialized's Eskar is fairly similiar- a little slower, but a little grippier too. Better on the back than the front. And they seem not to wear at all (my original one has more use on it than my Nobby Nic managed in its whole lifespan, yet barely looks used)


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 8:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i had nobby nics last winter.. they didnt last very long ??? i think they are mud collectors too...


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 8:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm an average-to-numpty MTBer - and find the Eskars run tubeless hugely better than the NNs


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 8:20 pm
Posts: 10497
Free Member
 

How strange, I've got a 2.25" NN on the front of my FS and think it's a great tyre.

Run tubeless and flats are non-existent (cue me ripping a big hole in it next time out) run it with a Racing Ralph out back for most of the year, but might need to put a NN back out back soon.

Erm, try Ardents, my mate loves them on his Five


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 8:56 pm
 jedi
Posts: 10247
Full Member
 

i been using rubber queens since going tubeless 2 weeks ago. nice! although i got one to burp air on a drop ๐Ÿ™
need harder tyres for herts


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 8:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Specialized's Eskar is fairly similiar"
I'd have thought (from my armchair) they're more like fat alberts(/2.4" alberts?). The shear size (massive 2.3") could catch you out if dont' have lots of frame clearance (or wide-ish rims)

I'm guessing you've not got 'snakeskin' versions. IIRC Schwalbe only offer snakeskin on Nobby Nics in 2.4"
If you want to go a touch chunkier tread, snakeskin, but not have to go above 2.25, I've got on really well with Schwalbe Alberts this year. On-one hasn't got any of the dual compound ones left somewhat less than RRP.
Having said that I think I'm probably overdue putting mud tyres on (though its only the almost bald rear thats making me think I should - the front has been pretty good for a non mud tyre)


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:03 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

james - Member

(massive 2.3)

Eskars come in just slightly under 2.3. They only seem massive because we're so used to bigger lies ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I realise that. 2.5" maxxis for eg ..

I was thinking about getting some 2.3" eskars to replace my 2.25" advantages (which I thought were big for a 2.25") until I wheeled my bike upto an eskar'd enduro. Way bigger
Admitedly the 2.3" eskars would have been on slightly wider rims but even so


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:19 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

definite marmite tyre, can't get on with them but others rave. running maxxis hr front/crossmark rear tubeless but rear needs something more mud orientated now.

got a nice shiny (well not actually) NN evo tubeless 2.25 if any takers.....


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:22 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I love my 2.25 nobby nic on the front, tubeless and snakeskin and no problems whatsoever. I bought a 2.25 advantage to try on the front but it ain't as big as the nobby nic and has gone on the back for now.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"I love my 2.25 nobby nic on the front, tubeless and snakeskin and no problems whatsoever. I bought a 2.25 advantage to try on the front but it ain't as big as the nobby nic "

Really?
My 2.25" Advantage is noticably bigger than my schwalbe 2.25" albert )I thought schwalbe sizing was pretty consistent? Maybe not then?


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:38 pm
Posts: 13806
Full Member
 

shirley it depends on what rim the tyre is on!

FWIW I like the NN's tubeless.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:43 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

bruneep - Member

shirley it depends on what rim the tyre is on!

Much less than you'd think.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you get a lot of pinch flats perhaps you run pressures too low or the tyre is too flimsy for you and your riding? The Nobby Nic's are only 550g-600g plus tyres right? Like a lot of the Continental tyres e.g. Mountain King?

I love my Prowler SS 2.3 (rear) and Stout 2.3 (front) combo and wish I had bought more of them when CRC had them for silly money. They are heavy at +800g but they rarely ever puncture with my 100 miles (50 of which is commuting) per week and 15 stone bodyweight. I also like my Spesh Eskars, which are light at 700g ish, but the Stout outperforms the Eskar on the front and the Prowler SS wears MUCH slower than an Eskar. Can't believe the Prowler SS never caught on, it's very much like a Kenda Small Block or Larsen TT, but much more mountain bikey....

I prefer a bit of pressure in the rear to be honest. 50-55 psi. When I went too soft, like 35, the bike got slower and I ended up putting the 5.1's a little bit wibbly. Plus I got more pinch punctures. In front I stick in 35 psi.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:48 pm
 SOAP
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've been running a 2.5 (more like a 2.3) single ply Minion DHF and a 2.25 aDvantage R
loads of grip and enough volume to smooth out rocks and take impacts.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 9:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rs 4 Kev. I've tried to email you reference the tyre but your email address doesn't appear to work. How much do you want for the nobby nic


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 10:55 pm