Forum menu
By way of balance that bit of "trail" (if it's at the top)is in a residential area and locals may well have asked for it to be "sanitised" to make it more pedestrian/child/buggy/rambler friendly so they can access the road.Let's see what response you get as to the reason this work was carried out.
As for the bottom section everytime I've ridden it in daytime I have encountered walkers, on one occasion an elderly couple actually remarked they were now struggling on some sections because so much had been washed away.Don't they have a right to use the path too?
The quality/suitability of any repair is a different matter and that needs MTBers input but it's not just our path.
Maybe someone complained about the procession of MTBers flying down the trail trying to get KOMs 🙂
The two houses below that are within metres/access to Hep'- I wonder if they had a say (or pushed for this?).
I quite like CTC and not just because they namechecked SingletrAction loads in a recent article ([url] http://www.ctc.org.uk/file/public/201305046-feature-making-tracks.pdf [/url])
I suspect they're probably the best bet for a co-ordinated MTB advocacy group at national level. AS well as them doing stuff it's also about people finding a bit of stuff that they can do and then doing it. I quite liked Chipps recent editorial about "there's no them to do trail tidying (or much else really) on behlaf of riders. Was a good point well made.
The lack of familiarity, confidence, expertise, perception issues, glacial pace of certain organisations etc all conspire to dampen the enthusiasm of the young-bucks (or even old) salts when it comes to trail or PROW issues. An inability to compromise or see matters from numerous perspectives, not just your own, are also obstacles to getting more trail done.
Don't know how it all gets solved but just keep beavering away at bits and pieces as do mugboo, unkle, Paul and many others.
Of course, bloody volunteers falling out amongst themselves is a bit of a bugger as well 😉
As for the bottom section everytime I've ridden it in daytime I have encountered walkers, on one occasion an elderly couple actually remarked they were now struggling on some sections because so much had been washed away.Don't they have a right to use the path too?
How would dumping a load of loose gravel on a steep path help them to use it though?
How would dumping a load of loose gravel on a steep path help them to use it though?
2 issues,
First wasting tax payers money on repairs that tick a box but achieve nothing except for overtime for the lads doing it.
Secondly making ROW's usable for all
ThePinkster - your no doubt right about joining the CTC
BadlyWiredDog - thanks for the info on the Ramblers, etc.
I know the threads about the Blue Pig but surely this one trail is a red herring compared with the big picture? How do we move forward?
If the CTC are capable of being the body & SingletrAction, PMBA, etc are already affiliated, is it just a matter of joining them on mass and aiming our letters in their direction?
One other point.
Following this issue and the peak district one. I am drowning in sea of acronyms and associations! Is there a simple and definitive answer as to who to vent your spleen/point your carefully worded letter at?
slightly off topic to this but of concern to me is the maintenance/conservation of all the ancient pack horse trails around Calderdale.
I see them as 8th wonder of the world.
IMO these should be given some protection status just in case a heavy handed council says they need 'improving'/made safe as they are bound to do for public bridleways.
Surely the increased speeds now achievable on that path will make it far more difficult to brake in a controlled manner 😈
Add some mother nature and a few 'longest skid' contests and I think character could be restored?
I agree totally with the OP's sentiments though. What next, running a road to the top of Snowdon so people don't have to get out of their cars to get up there?
Or a train..
😆
It's already possible to drive up Snowdon.
If you don't mind prison food 🙂
There's a suggestion that the [url= http://www.walkandridefestival.co.uk ]South Pennine Walk and Ride Festival[/url] coordinate a couple of days of trail maintenance in the area as part of the Festival - 7-22 September, with the excellent Bill Brady.
The idea is to get out and fix trails properly before the gravel-it-over brigade get to them.
Could be a very nice weekend for anyone who wants to come along - a day of riding and a day of digging!
2 issues,
First wasting tax payers money on repairs that tick a box but achieve nothing except for overtime for the lads doing it.
Secondly making ROW's usable for all
As above, any campaign must be based around these two issues, and there is a risk that it just sounds like MTBers moaning about de-teching sections otherwise. Has anyone approached the local bridelway assocation about this? Aside from the weatherproofing issues (don't they need rain bars with gravel on any kind of slope?) I can't imagine loose grave on a slope on a nag would be much fun.
Andy
If I wasn't down south at a relatives party this weekend, I'd be shoving a pair of Minions on, a rear facing camera and going for the longest skid contest. Enough time between the main street and the gravel starting to pick up enough speed to carry you locked up a long way down there...
And of course this isn't the answer. Question is, in terms of sustainable trail maintenance, the only way to make something thats suitable for walkers, horse people and riders is hardpack dirt. When it erodes, more hardpack dirt. Any kind of rocky armouring isn't going to please anyone...
http://www.iprow.co.uk/gpg/index.php/Steps_and_Stone_Pitching
http://www.snh.org.uk/uplandpathwork/3.4.shtml
Something like this would be perfect around Calderdale - hard-wearing, water-resistant, unobtrusive, plus the local stone is really grippy.
Unfortunately it's a lot more work and potential expense than paying a generic contractor to tip scalpings on it.
Any kind of rocky armouring isn't going to please anyone...
Why not? sounds the ideal solution to me, financially prohibative for the council tho maybe, unless they could bring horse riders/walkers/mtbers all together in a voluntery utopian wheelbarrow push..
Mountain biking, by contrast, is a relatively young [b]sport[/b]. It's not focussed on clubs in the way that older sports are. Many of the participants are relatively young with lots in their lives beyond riding bikes
I think part of the problem of an organised, collective voice for "mountain biking" is that definition. Is it a sport? Is it a pastime? Well it's either and its both. But, looking at the comparison, the Ramblers Association focuses on walking as a pastime. The sports side of walking is run by different people. Now, in mountain biking, what organisation there is seems to be predominantly on the sports (i.e. competitive) side of things, perhaps the access / rights of way stuff is getting missed because we don't have a "ramblers" mountain biking organisation for those of us who want to ride mountain bikes around the countryside, but have no interest in racing people while doing it?
edlong
British Cycling deal with the competative sport side of cycling
CTC would be more like the ramblers
Cheers BA
I thought CTC was more road oriented? (Not done my research, just the impression I have of them) Do they concern themselves with the issues of those of a more knobbly-tyred bent?
I guess they are more road orientated, that makes up probably 90% of their membership. They do represent MTB, but in a small way at the moment. There are a couple of relevant points above, mtber saying they will not join CTC until they are represented, but CTC are going to represent their membership base, chicken and egg etc etc.
there's even a link a few posts above^^ to an article in the lastest CTC members magazine about trail centres and trail building, including quotes from volunteer trail builders and professional trail builders.
What's the Ramblers Association's stance on MTBing? From all the posts you read about militant "red socks" blocking trails one might suppose they'd be anti, but is that just the small minority getting noticed?
It strikes me that on the non-sporting side, the issues MTBers have have got more in common with ramblers than with road cyclists (rights of way, access, shared hatred of hooligans in 4x4s or on MX bikes chewing up the countryside etc.)
Can we get the RA to have a MTB "wing"? The reality is that they (the RA) are the ones who always seem to have their feet under the table when there's "consultation" processes going on.
I vote you write that letter 🙂
Who knows, maybe we all have the wrong impression.
[reply]
Thank you for your kind letter
We've watched your sweary northerners video.
Thanks, but no thanks!
Yours
Red Socks Brigade.
[/reply]
A while ago on the kilder anniversary I and some others engaged with them a bit. Not anti as such, but in no way pro, pretty anti shared use footpaths etc...
RamblersUK follow singletraction's twitter feed... Keep your friends close... 😉
keep your enemy close...., do you mean?
There are shared interests and common ground, but co operation?, not in our lifetime I think, would be nice tho.
Quick thanks to Pook for taking the time and effort to voice his concerns.
Quick thanks to Pook for taking the time and effort to voice his concerns.
Yes
Doh, replace 'anyone' with 'everyone'.
Don't thing horsey types would be too keen on riding on rocky 'trail centre-esque' tracks. Maybe I'm wrong though, I don't drive horses.
Senior bloke in RA was interviewed in a mag some years ago, iirc he wasn't anti bike but he also wasn't shared access.
I think CTC do more MTB stuff than may be obvious. Ian Warby does a lot and is specifically MTB. Think he's been developing a volunteer trail builder training course. Stuff like that should be good. See the article I linked on page 2.
Sure, it's roots are as the cycle touring club but I think MTB might be rather like snowboarding is/was to skiing. The combined usage and big increase in user numbers mean there's really benefits from taking an approach that benefits both.
Think anyone can apply to be a CTC rep. More riders who have some MTB about them the better it'll be for all of us in the end.
I'm no horsist either, but it's been claimed on here that they are more than capable off road and could easily out perform most numpties on a bike on techy terrain, only impeded by the ability or willingness of their jockey. I think there is a strong cost v benefit v rider ability analysis for most horse owners which trends them towards flat and easy. Vets and Blacksmiths are bloody expensive!.
Fantastic news for me this as it was too lumpy bumpy for me and will be a lot safer for us
What grade would it be suited to now a nice blue route?
Try riding a horse on anything but flat. You also have to balance/adjust as the horse moves alot.
Would you ride a horse on Pecketwell? I wouldn't. It isn't really safe for a horse IMO.
[img] http://www.eponashoe.com/images/Tevis2006.jpg [/img][img] http://www.freewebs.com/bridleways/3steep%20alpine%20paths.jp g" target="_blank">
http://www.eponashoe.com/images/Tevis2006.jpg [/img][img] http://www.freewebs.com/bridleways/3steep%20alpine%20paths.jp g"/> [/img]
Don't thing horsey types would be too keen on riding on rocky 'trail centre-esque' tracks. Maybe I'm wrong though, I don't drive horses.
I haven't seen anything at a trail centre, apart from the biggest drops to steep downhills, that I wouldn't ride a horse down and I'm not even a good rider. Techy rocky ascents/descents are fun on horses. Gravel is boring. Steep Tarmac is dangerous.
Try riding a horse on anything but flat. You also have to balance/adjust as the horse moves alot.
OMG, that sounds impossible, like trying to ride a bicycle off road in the wet! How could anyone do that?
Would you ride a horse on Pecketwell? I wouldn't. It isn't really safe for a horse IMO.
What does this Pecketwell look like?
Mikewsmith thats like posting Leogang DH and comparing it to what all posters on here can actually ride.
When I say ride I dont mean wearing the gear and brake dragging either 😉
Yep Hora it's like making blanket sweeping statements about most things 😉
Thats right. So we should preserve the gnarly just for us. Its ours principly. Right?
Theres a few crying into over Stanage. Oh get over it its access to many users. The only issue with bluepig is its badly done. If it was trail centre compacted riders would still decry the injustice.
If it was made gnarl riders would instantly forget horse/walkers and rave about it no? 😉
Try a horse ride. Its fun. Hurts your legs mind
Try riding a horse on anything but flat. You also have to balance/adjust as the horse moves alot.
Would you ride a horse on Pecketwell? I wouldn't. It isn't really safe for a horse IMO.
Good point. I've written to the council asking them to flatten the hills around Hebden - seeing as horses can only ride on the flat. 🙄
The only time I've ever ridden a horse was in Spain and it was on steep, narrow, rough tracks - it was great fun.
Grim you always twist a post.
Not really, just pointing out the numerous logical fallacies in your posts.
You keep calling me grim when it's not my name.
Please don't let this thread get Hora'ed. 🙁
Here's a comment a Pennines ranger posted on the front page story, in case anyone missed it. If I was local I'd be helping out...
rangerbill said: On April 29, 2013I’m here, covering the Mary Towneley Loop,on my own except one volunteer on a Wednesday.
I’ve got a Landy that seats 5, we’ve got tools. Come and help me please.Ive got a stone pitching job to do at the top of Gorple that I cant afford and I’m trying to put CMBC off graveling over that.
Ive got half of the section between Marsh Lane and Jumble Hole Clough to try and save (the top bit is now the yellow brick road). That just needs some landscaping and IMBA style RGDs
I’ve got a section below Pinnacle lane that needs RGDs putting in because they blasted that with gravel over the evil that is terram.
Theres a section at Boulsworth that needs work before it gets blasted.
Widdop
Salter Rake
Reddyshore Scout.
Ive got Shizzle loads. Put down your laptop and pick up a spade!
(I’ve tried so hard not to swear)william.brady@lancashire.gov.uk
Please don't let this thread get Hora'ed
Why? I'm saying different users all want to use the same trail. This means it'll have to be a compromise to a degree as you want it to be interesting but as open/accessible to as many as possible.
A difficult balancing act.
I wish everywhere had a rangerbill, I wonder who ours is?
