Anyone still using ...
 

[Closed] Anyone still using square taper bottom brackets? (Middleburn content)

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Its time for new cranks. Already have the chainrings so I'm a little reluctant to pay for another set. The Middleburn RS7 and 8 keep catching my eye, especially the RS7 with the lifetime guarantee. Is anyone still using square taper cranks and bottom brackets? Is getting new bottom brackets a problem?


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:00 pm
Posts: 9057
Free Member
 

Yes, and I wouldn't change.
Did once and went back.

Even managed to find a brand new XTR UN91 on fleabay for £13!


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes. The 'new' UN54 is OK. The plastic NDS cup is more brittle than of old, and the cartridge is a different diameter, so you can't use an old decent plastic/alloy NDS cup from a UN53/73/93, or for that matter, from an octalink BB. But they're OK.

Old RF or proper bling Royce etc sq taper BBs are still ace.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rs7s are awesome - as far as bb's go, you can fork out for a phil wood square taper with awesome changeable bearings, or have numerous un54s for £11 each

rjc x-treme for the best price


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:03 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

yes - RS7 on UN72 (found a NOS). Have one more UN72 which I've pencilled in for 2020 to 2040.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:04 pm
Posts: 76
Free Member
 

Currently using UN54 BB with no problems. About £13 to 16 at the moment.
Obviously if you want to spend more you could go for royce or phil wood etc.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 8373
Full Member
 

I run one on my winter off road commuter. UN54 weighs a bit but is dead cheap and lasts 2 to 3 years used daily in wet and muddy conditions.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:09 pm
Posts: 6293
Full Member
 

Yup- and as mentioned above, get a high end BB and replace the bearings as and when (if!) needed.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh yes, one RS8 on a UN73, and another on a Phil Wood Mag/Ti BB.

Trouble is that I get a alu/titanium creak that I can't quite kill off 🙁


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My son pinched my XT one for his bike (the third bike it's been on in the ten years I've owns it). Still running as well as the day I bought it for about £20.

All my bikes are octalink at the mo, but when those BBs fail I'll be going to square taper: fitted properly, can't be beaten IMHO.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yeah rs8 on un54 here, lovely

have always had square taper


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:34 pm
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

RS7 on cheapie ST BB here - no problems.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:37 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

UN54 seems fine, still going strong in our commuters. Wouldn't personally put Middleburn on a bike but there's nothing wrong with squaretaper in principle.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:47 pm
Posts: 9
Full Member
 

Another RS8 with UN5? here. I also use a square taper TA Axix steel BB on the fixed road bike - Very nice unit, not silly money and most importantly - standard cartridge bearings mean it's a doddle to replace worn out bearings, with whatever grade of bearing takes your fancy/fits your budget. Worth a look IMO [url= http://www.specialites-ta.com/produits/boitiers_gb.htm ]http://www.specialites-ta.com/produits/boitiers_gb.htm[/url]


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 4:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

there's a lot right with square taper as well - a decent interference-fit, unlink some of the later interfaces.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 5:16 pm
 OCB
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, I've got a nice Dura-Ace crankset and a couple of Sugino cranksets running on probably UN5[i]n[/i] BB's. They've been in there so long I can't confidently say what they are!

(... and I [i]very[/i] lightly grease the tapers on mine too 😈 )


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 5:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

there's a lot right with square taper as well

I think the only thing wrong is people not fitting them correctly (i.e. too loose), and that it isn't the ideal system if you want to keep uninstalling and reinstalling the same cranks. I've seen arguments about strength and rigidity, but as I've never had an issue there (and I weight 16 stone) so it's all a bit academic really.

(... and I very lightly grease the tapers on mine too )

Yup, me too.


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 5:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

17 stone on a single speed and no problems in two years, used two or three times a week, and thats just a £16 shimano bb , 🙂


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 6:30 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

Yep UN54, Race Face Turbines on SS, UN54, old Bonty cranks on commuter. Thought about getting a Phil Wood to replace the one on the SS that just wore out but for the cost of the fitting tool (nevermind the BB) I could get a new UN54!


 
Posted : 06/07/2011 6:36 pm