Forum menu
Summary:
- Bloke drives like a twunt and attracts verbal criticism from cyclist.
- Driver and cyclist argue.
- Driver gets mates and assaults cyclist.
- Driver confirms twunt status.
- Coppers seek twunt.
Where was the "drives like a twunt" bit in the article ?
That's the norm in this scenario. Ok, twunt argues with cyclist (who may also be a twunt) etc
Not really the pertinent bit of the story pies. Admittedly cyclist could have been riding like a twunt, car driver abused him for it, arguments ensued.... but I reckon that's much less likely than car driver was a twunt and being called out on it was taken as an affront on his masculinity or car occupants abused cyclist for no reason and arguments ensued etc.
That aside, the important bit is twunt in golf after some verbals got his mates and beat up another person.
That was my interpretation of it d0nk to be fair.
The fact that anyone thinks it's okay to get a group of mates to beat someone up makes them pretty low in the order of knuckle-dragging inbreds.
The fact that anyone thinks it's okay to get a group of mates to beat someone up makes them pretty low in the order of knuckle-dragging inbreds.
Surely not, it's the default in any consumer rights thread on STW;
*first response mentions SOGA,
*second is the small claims court,
*and by post 3 "turn up at his shop on a busy Saturday with 2 of your biggest mates" is the only solution.
Ha ha yeah there is a pattern
Yeah, but the posters on here are keyboard warriors