Forum menu
27.2 seatposts
 

[Closed] 27.2 seatposts

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

was told today by my LBS that a carbon seatpost in 27.2 was'nt a could idea due to possible failure , is this true as I thought it would flex abit for my hardtail ?


 
Posted : 27/03/2010 8:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Please, pleeeeease tell us who your LBS is


 
Posted : 27/03/2010 8:56 pm
 CHB
Posts: 3234
Full Member
 

ignore them unless you are doing crazy jumps. I am 14st and have a fairly long carbon post on my bike, and two kids to prove that (so far) no damage!!).


 
Posted : 27/03/2010 8:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I thought so lol I had my wallet out to buy one but got turned away do they flex that much ? whats a good one ???


 
Posted : 27/03/2010 9:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what tosh.

yes they have a bit more flex, but do gain strength from generally having a slightly thicker wall thickness.

I like 27.2 due to the flex, but you're just as likely to snap an ally one.

The bike industry seem to be the only people left in the world who think Ally is stronger/safer than carbon


 
Posted : 27/03/2010 9:45 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

I didnt like the flex so swapped for a Thomson. Never crossed my mind that it would fail. Work in engineering so can appreciate how strong the stuff is. I dont think I'd ever ride an alloy rigid fork, have given carbon forks some good hammering but wouldnt feel safe on a rigid alloy.


 
Posted : 27/03/2010 9:53 pm
 CHB
Posts: 3234
Full Member
 

The flex is the best bit about a good carbon (or Ti) post. It really takes the buzz out of the trail, much comfier on a hardtail. I don't have ANY Aluminium posts on my bikes appart from a Thomson on my FS.


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 2:35 pm
Posts: 3775
Free Member
 

had a 27.2mm carbon Kore IBeam post on both my HT and Full suss for 18 months with no issues. On the HT its almost ran at full height (and its a 400mm post)


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As soon as I've got the cash I'm getting a carbon post for the commuter, alu one is a bit harsh


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm still waiting to hear which LBS this was ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 3775
Free Member
 

also run a 26.6mm carbon post on commuter x bike with no issues - that does go offroad


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 4:50 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

takisawa2 - Member
I didnt like the flex so swapped for a Thomson. Never crossed my mind that it would fail. Work in engineering so can appreciate how strong the stuff is. I dont think I'd ever ride an alloy rigid fork, have given carbon forks some good hammering but wouldnt feel safe on a rigid alloy.

what's the difference between forks and seatposts that makes this decision for you?


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 5:07 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

i have snapped two carbon posts and have never snapped a alloy one yet.When they let go there is a pretty loud crack


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 5:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rigid alloy forks are fine on my crosser


 
Posted : 28/03/2010 5:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Carbon fibre (the high modulus stuff at least) is stiffer than steel, aluminium and titanium. Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic CFRP
http://aluminium.matter.org.uk/content/html/eng/default.asp?catid=89&pageid=2144417038


 
Posted : 29/03/2010 12:55 pm