Forum search & shortcuts

1 x 11 or 1 x 12. R...
 

[Closed] 1 x 11 or 1 x 12. Really?

Posts: 1510
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#11138107]

Having always has 3 x 10 on my MTB I really cannot get my head around a 1 x 11 or 1 x 12 on a 29er hardtail. One minute I might be flying along a piece of tarmac on my way to a trail or climbing up a 25% gradient bit of off road track and I find I use the 22/40 as much as the 40/11

So I am curious that with less gears does a single setup work for that type of riding as I am struggling to understand how it works.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:03 pm
Posts: 1184
Free Member
 

Things like this work really well if you try them out for yourself.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:06 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Yup.

I grew up with 3x.

I'm a big fan of 1x.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:09 pm
Posts: 31134
Full Member
 

Deore 11-46t 10spd cassette and a wide range rear mech… cheap way to find out for yourself.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:10 pm
Posts: 863
Free Member
 

I cannot see myself ever wanting a front derailleur again. Life is so much better with 1x


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:13 pm
Posts: 863
Free Member
 

I cannot see myself ever wanting a front derailleur again. Life is so much better with 1x.
Plus it saves quite a bit of weight. 500g in my case


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:13 pm
Posts: 6761
Free Member
 

Do you really have a triple with a 11-40t cassette?

Work out the gear ratios and restrict your current gears to that and you can work out if it's ok without spending any money at all.

fwiw, I found 11-42 wasn't really enough but pretty happy with 10-50/51 12 speed.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:15 pm
Posts: 1510
Free Member
Topic starter
 

but don't you find that you sacrifice both top and bottom end as a result of the 36 front?


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:15 pm
Posts: 6761
Free Member
 

36-10 is the same as 40-11 isn't it?


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:16 pm
Posts: 1510
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Do you really have a triple with a 11-40t cassette?

Yes. Obviously, I cannot use both extremes.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:16 pm
Posts: 43965
Full Member
 

I get where you are coming from. Personally, I find that 2x with a 11-40 something cassette works well for me. 3x was only really a thing when cassettes were restricted to 32/34T


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:17 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7218
Full Member
 

I remember when the biggest cassette I could get was 28t


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:19 pm
Posts: 812
Free Member
 

Coming from 3x9 then 2x9 and straight to 1x12 i was worried i wouldnt have a crawler gear (or 2) , or the ratios would be badly spaced etc. Gone 1x12. 32t front on shimano 10-51 rear and after a few rides I would never consider going back....


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have a play with this - http://gear-calculator.com/

I went from 3x9 on a 26" to 1x10 on a 29". I reckon I "lost" three ratios. That was before the current crop of wide range cassettes, it would be more like 1.5 - 2 ratios now. On a typical ride in the Dales with 30T up front and 11-40T at the back I'd probably only use the middle eight, the bottom gear might get used once in a while and the top gear if I was on a downhill bit of tarmac.

I've one 11spd bike which is currently 30T with 11-42T but when that wears out I might go 32T and 11-50T.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:27 pm
 mboy
Posts: 12655
Free Member
 

Never used all the gears when I had a bike with 3x10... That was 24/32/42 with 11-36 cassette, which gave me 573% gear range.

At the time, I changed to 2x10 with 24/36 with 11-36, which gave 496% gear range. Very occasionally felt I wanted a slightly taller top gear than 36/11 (but only on a road descent), a change to a 38T ring would have sufficed.

These days I've got 1x12 on both my main MTB's, SRAM X01 Eagle AXS with a 10-50T cassette and 32T ring on my full sus, and Shimano SLX with a 10-51 cassette and 32T ring on my Hardtail. I've got gears for all occasions on both. Occasionally on road, as per with 36/11 top gear with 2x10, I could do with a 2T larger chainring for a bit more speed, but that's about 0.00001% of my riding on either of these bikes. Off road, 32/10 is plenty tall enough, or I'm pumping. That said, on the HT at least which is only about 27lb, I could happily put a 34T ring on instead of the 32 and gain a little more top end speed and still maintain a 0.66:1 bottom gear.

22/40 is absolutely ridiculous! I can't see how you need that low a gear for anything! 🤷🏻‍♂️


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:28 pm
 tomd
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The big problem that 1x10 solved for me was drive chain reliability and durability. I used to always get dodgy shifting and chainsuck after ~500km with a front derailleur.

I can run 1x10 for much, much longer with total neglect and it just seems to keep on going even with the chain massively worn. Yes there's less range but I'm OK with spinning out the odd time or having to work a bit harder uphill.

If 3x10 work well for your riding and it doesn't give you any bother then crack on.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:31 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

I strongly suspect that 12sp Shimano will convert you.

Personally I now realise I could have stayed 11sp, but the 12sp stuff is very very nice.

The setup suggested by Kelvin would be fine as well.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 8:36 pm
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

Couple of 1x11 setups, MTB: 32t 10-42 the Gravel bike: 42t 11-42.

Neither needs more range on them, I’ve recently bought a second hand road bike which is 2x10 and realised how much I despise front mechs! My tandem is 3x9, but I’m often in the granny ring on that beast!


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 9:00 pm
Posts: 1910
Free Member
 

Loved 1x11 10-42 with 30 up front but every now and then either wanted another gear for pelting downhill and another for really steep stuff. But still overall great, so much more reliable and intuitive to use.
1x12 Shimano 10-51 with 32 up front is all that and with the two things I occasionally wished for at each end, so basically perfect.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 9:23 pm
Posts: 31134
Full Member
 

I used to always get dodgy shifting and chainsuck

Same here, especially chainsuck. Spent a future getting the first XX1 chainset to get their narrow/wide ring to use with Shimano 10 speed. Never ever had chainsuck in all the years since.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 9:32 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

TBH, I can't see why anyone would run 2x or even 3x. I remember all the faff of trying to set up a front mech and the ridiculous overlap of 27 gears. Back in 2006, I went 2x up front which simplified matters a great deal, now 1x drivetrains have more than enough range now that you can get them with larger cassettes than 10-40. I don't miss the front mech, TBH they're a pain in the arse to set up.

Longevity seems to be pretty good, I've an M8000 XT drivetrain with a Sunrace 11-46 cassette that has clocked up three years' usage on one of my bikes. I couldn't do that with old school nine speed.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 9:40 pm
Posts: 6826
Full Member
 

I ran 3x7,8,9 and 3x10 which I was perfectly happy with. Then bought a bike with 1x11 which I’m also happy with. I imagine my next bike at some point will have 1x12.

Meh, pros and cons, not worth getting over excited about as they all work and non are significantly better than the other.


 
Posted : 12/04/2020 11:10 pm
Posts: 16534
Full Member
 

Like all things, it's a compromise.

If I were bike packing round the world id want a 3x whatever.

On my 1x 12 I've biased the gears to help on the ups as I'm a biffer and not that fit. Though improving...

So... I don't mind spinning out on the roads I ride to get to my local, natural trails. At those speeds downhill off road I'll be out of the saddle and pedalling is secondary to not falling off anyway!Lol

So for me the positives outweigh the only negative,a reduction in range.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 12:22 am
Posts: 5048
Full Member
 

My ebike is 1x10, it never really feels like it needs more tbh.
However my surly karate monkey (which i use fully loaded for touring)
Always needs the full range of 2x10.
With that said, i reckon 1x12 could work for me.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 1:22 am
Posts: 7127
Full Member
 

I'd forgotten about chainsuck. Worth it just for that.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 8:34 am
Posts: 17294
Full Member
 

I’ve always hated setting up front mechs and when full of mud and grit they don’t work anyway.

The other benefit of single ring is the rear wheel no longer fills up with mud and now is so easy to clean.

Front mechs are officially dead. Be gone to the pits of hell .

I do however still have the granny ring mounted and if I needed to could shift it by hand.
Never used it.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 8:41 am
Posts: 166
Free Member
 

It’s fine, really!

I’m 10-50 eagle with a 34 front ring and I can get up anything and spin out only on steep road descents where it doesn’t matter.

I really do not miss the rattly, chainsucky mess that was gears from the early 2000s

I do miss properly light cassettes, IMO it’s worth scouting around/spending a bit more for a light cassette. It’s unsprung weigh out there and the difference between cheep and expensive is a lot!


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 8:56 am
Posts: 2887
Full Member
 

I went the 1x route after doing a usual route I ride while staying in the middle ring. It was 45mins to the top of a local fell, with a bit of evrything, tarmac, rooty climbs, rocky bits some downy bits. It was no slower than normal and Didn't feel any worse for it.

Still on a 1 x 10 though on the main bike, with a Sunrace 12-46 cassette. Looking at that nice and cheap Advent X setup from Microshift for my other bike that still has a 3x set-up.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 9:13 am
 Mat
Posts: 874
Full Member
 

1x12 gives you a 500% range comparable to a 3x9 back in the day. I must admit my soul with 2x10 is frustrating, I like the ratio end points but it seems for undulating riding I’m always wanting something in between the big and little ring. Will upgrade to XT 12 speed when I can


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 9:16 am
Posts: 35125
Full Member
 

 One minute I might be flying along a piece of tarmac on my way to a trail or climbing up a 25% gradient bit of off road track and I find I use the 22/40 as much as the 40/11

You'll fly a little slower on the tarmac fo'shure, but tbh you can get up the same gradient in 32/50 that you can in the 22/40. You might not think you'd be able to, but you will.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 9:32 am
Posts: 2652
Free Member
 

Physics says that you can't .


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 9:46 am
Posts: 4185
Full Member
 

I love the simplicity of 1x11 but find the 420% range a touch restrictive.

Currently I have XX1 10-42 cassette + XTR mech and shifter. Am I right in saying there isn't a wider range 11 spd cassette that will work with my 11 spd XTR mech/shifter, and my only option is to go 12 speed?


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 9:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Having used both SRAM & Shimano 11 & 12sp drivetrains, Shimano 12sp is definitely the smoothest and quietest and also the slickest to use.

For MTB I def don’t need more than a 12sp 1x setup. The extra 5t on the cassette between 11sp and 12sp is noticeable and handy for the hills!


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 9:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So I am curious that with less gears does a single setup work

Well there is the root of your difficulty to visualise. The point is with a 1x set up you don’t have fewer gears and ultimately the main thing that matters is what range you have.

With a 3x set up you have so many duplicate gears that the number of different gears you actually have is probably around 11 or 12 and your overall range is very similar. So for roughly the same range and number of gears with a 1x you’re dropping the weight and complexity and other downsides of the 3x.

Sure you won’t be able to map 100% the gearing and you might need to decide on which end you want to make the compromises by chainring size choice - the top end or bottom end. But once you’ve done that 99% of the time you’ll have all the gears you need and the gains far outweigh the loss of the 1%.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:04 am
Posts: 46133
Full Member
 

Most of the household is running 1x11 or 1x10 on MTBs.

I like how simple and light it is. We never drop chains. It lasts well.

That said, it is not quite as fast sometimes on the road (I can deal with that). More of an issue is that on big climbs I'm often wanting another few teeth lower...

Mrs_oab is about to go 'back' to 2x - she wanted the lower gears again for climbs. I'm tempted to join her...

I'm using 2x on our tourer/gravel bikes. I've added a bigger cassette up to limit of the mech. It's spot on, as the extra variation of gears gets speed on road and climbing ability.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:11 am
Posts: 12344
Full Member
 

I've got very recent relevant experience here having gone from a Lapierre Zesty 3x10 to A LLS Whyte 629 with 1x12 just last week. I was thinking it might be a retrograde step too, but in reality there was no getting accustomed to it or difference really.

Like the 10 speed, there's a small gap in the middle of the range where you think you could do with an inbetween ratio, but that's common for me when I hit a sweet spot of speed and cadence on the flat.

The LLS geometry doesn't feel odd either, which I'm well chuffed with.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:30 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

If you genuinely have stuff you can't ride without 22/40, then you won't find that gear on a 1x setting, although a 28t chainring gets you close.

A 10-51 Shimano setup would be closest, with either a 28t or 30t, depending on which end of the range is the most important.

This site is great for visualising your setup.

https://ritzelrechner.de/


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:33 am
Posts: 6855
Full Member
 

The other benefit of single ring is the rear wheel no longer fills up with mud and now is so easy to clean.

Curious about this. Are you saying a larger cassette clogs less?


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:35 am
Posts: 43965
Full Member
 

At least some folk have been honest enough to admit they like 1x because they can't set up a front mech. Whenever I suggest that as a reason, everyone goes on the defensive.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@timmys - you can get a Sunrace 11-50T 11spd cassette. From CRC reviews it seems that it works with SLX and XT medium cage mechs but not seen anything about XTR.

There are 11-46T cassettes, both Shimano (M8000) and Sunrace do them.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:46 am
Posts: 41886
Free Member
 

I've gone from 1x10 11-36 to 12s 10-50.

TBH after years of singlespeeds I dont really appreciate it 🤣

I did wonder if I'd get on with a really small chainring (like a 24t) and 10s cassette. Same spinny low gear, and still a higher top gear than a normal 52" singlespeed.

My main issue with 12s is the weight right over the rear axle, again singlespeed makes you appreciate how much effect weight there has.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:54 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

I can set front mechs up good enough, I just prefer not to.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 10:55 am
Posts: 7935
Free Member
 

Depends on your priorities IMO.

If range is important 1x12 is just the ticket. If you want to closely match your ratios and cadence a la roadie style, go for 2x.

1x11 doesn't have the range or the gear steps to match your cadence as well. No real difference from 1x10. Perfectly fine to use, but offers none of the advantages.

My priority is range, but I'm exclusively a trail hacker and am neither a warp speed flow rider or a tarmac user, I do like a rooty technical climb, so I bias my 1x12 downwards by using a 28t chain ring on the HT and a 30t on the FS.

As TINAS says, these big old 12 SPD cassettes and mechs have some serious unsprung mass to them though. Less of an issue on the HT, more so on the FS.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 11:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The unsprung mass isn't as much as you think if you have something like SRAM with their lighter XD drive, or Shimano's new micro spline, and the more expensive machine from solid cassettes. Again, there is not any single domineering factor...its a net result of everything and not everything is done for ultimate performance...the convenience of 1x is something you will benefit from far more than anything you might notice from a slight increase in unsprung weight. Nobody worries about unsprung weight when going to a larger tyre...it is generally accepted the benefit the tyre brings, which you will notice, outweighs the increase in unsprung weight, which you don't really notice. We're not talking KG's here...just a handful of grams.

Also I find cassette wear is far better on 1x...usually you're driving a larger sprocket for a given ratio meaning more teeth engaged and lower stress on the cassette. Also I've never broken a chain since going 1x...chain wear is alot better...those chainring shifts take their toll on chain wear and abuse especially when clogged with grinding paste like mud.


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 11:39 am
Posts: 1510
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So do people find the gaps between gears too wide with the 10/51? I use my 29er for bikepacking as well so it needs to work for that.

Other question I have is regarding chain line and how smooth it feels when on the 10 or 51 sprocket?


 
Posted : 13/04/2020 11:41 am
Page 1 / 2