“i think the general consensus is they’re not far off being strong as flows when built properly, but lighter with a narrower ID”
“I am trying to decide between crests and flows”
etc
Has nobody come across the arch (And arch EX)?
Stans/ZTR website has some use descriptions and cross sections here:
http://www.notubes.com/ZTR-Rims-C18.aspx
(if you click on each rim they have some other descrition)
JustRidingAlong also have some descriptions on each rim
Bear in mind the 21mmID 400g Arch EX is on its way to replace the 19mmID 420g Arch which should sit better between the 21mmID 340g Crest and the (perhaps? due a revamp for 2013?*) 22.6ID 470g Flow
I’m waiting on the Arch EX’s (currently on Mavic XM719, hoping the little extra width should be spot on for me (width being my only real niggle with the mavics)
My interpretation (on trying to decide which to get) was that:
Crests are fine for wheels on the ground stuff and light jumps and/or light riders
(So long as you’re not tw*tting them into everything)
Arch(/Arch EX should) have extra stiffness due to ‘braced’ cross section, will take some abuse
Flow more stiffness, will take plenty more abuse. Extra internal diameter for really fat tyres (less ‘needed’ for many perhaps? now Arch EX is going upto same width as Easton Haven for eg)
*Purely guessing going by alpine, crest, arch EX all coming out to replace others