Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 44 total)
  • What size brake discs do you use…
  • freddiest
    Full Member

    …on your trail bike?

    Anyone gone smaller and preferred it or is bigger always better?

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    160 / 160 with mono minis works for me. Smaller is better until you overheat them

    steveh
    Full Member

    203 all round on everything for me apart from my jump bike as I had smaller ones lying around. I’ve only ever been happier with bigger ones.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    203 front/180 rear. But then I am all of the gnaar radness.

    freddiest
    Full Member

    203 / 180 on the five. Bent the rear and had to order a new 1 today 😥

    beanieripper
    Free Member

    could do a flat out 30 mph stoppie on a 185mm front disc on an a/m hardtail, put a 203 on it and whilst power increased, control and modulation suffered. back on a 185…you gotta find the right size for your speed/weight/style…

    racefaceec90
    Full Member

    160’s front and rear xt’s.find them perfect for my riding (anthem x2 bike 🙂

    nonk
    Free Member

    thats what i find beanie.

    Dancake
    Free Member

    160/ 160 for me . Plenty for what I ride.

    momo
    Full Member

    205/180 but I’m a fairly big bloke so do require the extra power unfortunately. Plenty of modulation though so don’t tend to lock wheels up too often.

    valleydaddy
    Free Member

    180/180mm for me on both bikes

    Dibbs
    Free Member

    180fr 160rr works best for me. I had 160/160 on one bike and it always felt a bit weak on the front brake compared to the others.

    sambob
    Free Member

    180/160 for me, but i’d probably be fine with 160/160.

    doughboy
    Full Member

    160/160 Hope and Shimano on my XC orientated bikes. Plenty of stopping power for me @ 13 stone.

    Ming the Merciless
    Free Member

    203F, 160R, for ultimate 1 finger stopping power up front.

    ianpinder
    Free Member

    i run 203/180 on my trail bike, but the new xtr are so powerfull i’m thinking of getting a smaller front rotor

    2hottie
    Free Member

    180/160 for me, works fine.

    _tom_
    Free Member

    160s on my do it all dandyhorse.

    pinches
    Free Member

    160 all round

    BoardinBob
    Full Member

    203 front and back

    Kato
    Full Member

    180/180 Formula
    180/160 XT

    TeaBoyPaul
    Full Member

    180fr 160r with Hope mono minis. Never felt under-braked, although like sambob I would prob be fine with 160 front and back.

    chainslapp
    Free Member

    I don’t use brakes, as this is the new niche to go with my 29er SS. 😆

    Actually 160/160 😳

    saladdodger
    Free Member

    I must be lacking on brakes
    165f & 145r

    very happy with the 145 rear but I am thinking of going up to 185 at the front

    KINGTUT
    Free Member

    160/160

    HansRey
    Full Member

    26” (aka magura hs33) 😆

    otherwise, 180/160 for XC and 203/180 for the mad bike

    RoterStern
    Free Member

    I have 180/160 on my two On-One’s and 160/160 on my ti race bike. I am thinking of putting 180 on the front of that one too as I really notice the difference in stopping power.

    iainc
    Full Member

    180/160 on 2 bikes (5 and Rock Lobster 853, with mono mini’s and servo xt’s respectively). I tried a 180 on the back of the RL but it felt wrong and too powerful. 160’s on new slx’s on the Bad Boy and it is the quickest stopper of the 3, presumably due the rigid fork and stiff setup…..in fact the night I fitted them I went for a wee test ride on the street about 11pm and grabbed a big handful of the front brake and went straight over the bars onto my lawn 😳 luckily no one saw me !!

    rickmeister
    Full Member

    180 f and 140 r both Hope floating with M4 calipers. Work from alpine to local trail centre….

    clubber
    Free Member

    203/180 on my 29er
    183/160 on my 26″

    AD
    Full Member

    180/160 Hayes Stroker Gram/Carbon – ‘trail’ bike
    180/XTR ‘v’ brake – singlespeed

    bigyinn
    Free Member

    203 / 180 on my rigid hardtail. Tried 160 / 160 and it just felt underbraked.
    203 / 180 on the Enduro Pro too.
    Im not particularly slow, but i am 16.5 stone.

    Pieface
    Full Member

    Had 160 Avid Elixir’s at each end. 160 was fine but upgraded to 185 up front and its better

    Lionheart
    Free Member

    I am with Clubber here:
    203 /185 on 29ner
    185/160 on 26″

    smaller ones on a 29ner looks wrong !? 😯 I need the extra disc to stop that extra rotating mass!!? (I am sure a physicist could prove me wrong here) . More thats what we have and they all feel about right.

    seosamh77
    Free Member

    203/180 i’m about 17stone though, so the extra power is needed.

    brooess
    Free Member

    180/180 Hope M4 on FS and HT. Fine in UK and Alps. 12stone. Never had a problem

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Hemlock has 203/160, Mmmbop has 180/160, rigid bike I think has 2 160s but I’m not sure about that.

    I know the 203/160 is weird but I’ve never felt any need for a bigger rear rotor, whereas I quite like the feel of the 203 up front.

    GW
    Free Member

    185/165 but will be switching to 160/160 next week. don’t really use my front brake much 😉

    falkirk-mark
    Full Member

    160/160 on xc bike if you need more just MTFU and pull the brake harder

    hughjayteens
    Free Member

    203/183 on my trail bike and the same on my HT so I can interchange wheels.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 44 total)

The topic ‘What size brake discs do you use…’ is closed to new replies.