Armstrong just keeps on pulling the wool over numpties’ eyes.
That’s what I mean!
You’re convinced that he’s a doper, that he’s guilty. Yet in any court of law Armstrong is INNOCENT. Yes, there have been claims & counter claims, former teammates have been found to have doped etc but that does NOT make him guilty!
All the stories out there weave some kind of tangled intricate web and say that because so-and-so doped Armstrong must have done as well or because a former employee saw a vial in his bathroom cabinet, it must have been EPO. Trying to make circumstantial evidence into something concrete.
Different cyclists get treated differently as well. Look at Richard Virenque who is still feted as a hero in France in spite of being a known persistent doper. Tommy Simpson is still regarded as being one of the greatest British cyclists in spite of dying of drugs/dehydration during the Tour (admittedly in a time when EVERYONE doped!). Pantani was regarded as a worthy winner of the Tour, his record breaking ascent of Alpe d’Huez still an official time. Bjarne Riis, Mr 60%, is directeur sportif of a TdF team in spite of being a known doper for years. Yet other cyclists get almost publically humiliated, reviled, talked down for years afterwards. Any interview with Millar now, it’s drugs this cheating that, his past constantly dredged up.
Until there is ONE laboratory following ONE set of protocols that is scrupulously clean and rigourously vetted, ONE anti drugs agency, a unified international standard of how to deal with it then the problem will persist. Having one set of rules in one country, a dodgy individual in one lab, an anti-doping chief with his own agenda (get Armstrong no matter what) then it’s not going to work.