• This topic has 46 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by TiRed.
Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 47 total)
  • Rear light consensus – Flashing or constant?
  • swillybey
    Free Member

    New to road riding, do people tend to have rear lights flashing or constant for (generally country lane) road rides at night? Exposure TraceR if makes any difference.
    Cheers now.

    whitestone
    Free Member

    Both

    simondbarnes
    Full Member

    One of each.

    davidtaylforth
    Free Member

    Couple of flashers on my bike and I’ve not been knocked off yet.

    angeldust
    Free Member

    Yep, one of each. Hedge your bets.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    one of each. Make sure they have large lenses. Pinpoint ones are harder to see than ones a couple of inches across. Don’t forget reflective tape on the bike especially the pedals

    jkomo
    Full Member

    Tracer flash is a combo shirley- it doesn’t go off but it pulses.

    joshvegas
    Free Member

    Flashing light on its own is hardwork to track if there are other lights about i find.

    One of each.

    benp1
    Full Member

    Both here too

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Its no longer a legal requirement to have a constant light is it? Do people think a constant one helps? I have two fladhing on the bike and one flashing on helmet. Not been killed yet.

    dovebiker
    Full Member

    Both – flashing light better at attracting attention, but fixed light makes it easier to judge distance. 2x lights in case one stops working.

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    Country lane stuff in actual darkness, usually one of each and they don’t even need to be particularly bright.

    Urban stuff in busy environments with lots of streetlights, car lights, shopfront lighting etc, the biggest brightest flashy thing possible.

    ads678
    Full Member

    Yep one of each here too.

    joshvegas
    Free Member

    Do people think a constant one helps?

    Yes see two posts above you.

    chipster
    Full Member

    Both.

    Rubber_Buccaneer
    Full Member

    I like my exposure rear light because it pulses rather than flashes. Very effective (well, I thought other peoples were so I bought one)

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Both. As a driver, I spot flashing faster but I find solid more helpful for position and distance.

    (I have a flasher and a solid one on the bike, a flashing one on my helmet and a solid one on my rucksack, partly because it can’t hurt and partly because I kind of like it)

    stevenmenmuir
    Free Member

    Don’t ride with just one on a flashing mode that has a 2-3 second period of darkness between flashes. Still I suppose it’s better than the large number of people riding at 5pm tonight with no lights on.

    bramblesummer
    Free Member

    Pulse mode as above. It has a constant low level with high power pluses every few seconds. Means it’s always on and flashing at the same time. I followed one in a car recently and it’s remarkably effective (hope District plus was the light)

    nixie
    Full Member

    Both and a third spare. Fibre flare on constant, flashing twin led and a old dinnotte 100lmn job to illuminate a huge section of road behind me.

    fudge9202
    Free Member

    Both. A flashing pdw on my mudguard and a solid moon light under my saddle oh and a flashing one on the rear of my helmet. As above as a driver I spot a flashing light first in the distance

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    as noted both for the reasons stated

    My lord we may have actual found a consensus position!

    My constant on i have is fairly large = old lummi thing but still very very bright – and a cheap but decent two LED flashing things

    I also have a low level glow stick thing for MTB as its fine on the dark lane and wont dazzle any rider behind me when off road.

    jonba
    Free Member

    Assume you are riding solo? Most winter chain gangs round me would insist on a constant light as flashing is distracting when you are riding behind someone for an hour.

    cp
    Full Member

    both. I have two flashing and one constant.

    steezysix
    Free Member

    I have my dynamo rear light mounted low down on the chainstay, above the dropout. This way it illuminates the road behind my bike and gives drivers a much better point of reference than a bright light “floating” in the air. Sometimes I’ll run a flasher on the back of my helmet if it’s foggy/raining but most of the time I think wearing reflective vest and ankle wraps is more effective. I am still alive so it must work.

    lunge
    Full Member

    Yep, both. Neither overly expensive either.
    I also have a flashing light on my helmet too.

    mrblobby
    Free Member

    My lord we may have actual found a consensus position!

    🙂

    Both here too. Combination works best for visibility, and you have a backup in case on fails.

    fifeandy
    Free Member

    Just because no-one has said it already:
    Both!

    Speshpaul
    Full Member

    Wot Lunge said, one on your helmet, gets it above hedge level

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    On MTB rides I just use one and turn it off when off-road.

    On road rides I use 2x lights, one magicshine light plugged into my main battery which pulses, and one normal rear light on constant. 2x is better than one pulsing light, for the simple reason light’s fall off and go flat and you’d never know until you (hopefully) got home!

    Wot Lunge said, one on your helmet, gets it above hedge level

    +1,

    One of these clipped into the rear vent of my helmet. Like pedal reflectors, one of these bobbing around at head level makes it obvious you’re a person/cyclist.

    Mister-P
    Free Member

    I set mine on pulse rather than flash and aim it sightly down so it lights up a large patch of road. As a driver I dislike massively bright flashing lights aimed high. I also have reflective tape on my mudguards and bright yellow overshoes with reflective accents to make it obvious I am a cyclist.

    brakes
    Free Member

    I have a TracerR and have it on pulse, but not on full strength as that can be blinding.
    It’s more than sufficient to be seen.

    Gary_M
    Free Member

    Flashing fibreflare on my helmet, constant moon something on seatpack, cateye ‘holy hand grenade’ on seatpost – one row on flashing and one on constant.

    I would never ride with only one light nor one on flashing only.

    shermer75
    Free Member

    Constant

    shifter
    Free Member

    Cateye 600, only ever flashing.

    timb34
    Free Member

    Daytime : one powerful flashing light on the seatpost
    Nighttime : powerful constant on the seatpost, small flasher on back of rucksack

    Still alive, but I don’t ride on particularly busy/fast roads

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Both.

    Riding up the cycle path through Hyde Park from the arch at night is a good demo. Most people have flashing only lights, and what should be an obvious line of cyclists is just a sea of blinking lights. You’ve got no idea what’s in front of you.

    Quite hard to track a moving red light amongst many moving red lights when it’s invisible for half the time. My flasher is on a fast flicker (Cateye) which is flickery enough to be very noticeable but on enough to track its movement. Lezyne on the other hand make their flash so slow as to be dangerously useless IMO.

    shermer75
    Free Member

    and what should be an obvious line of cyclists is just a sea of blinking lights. 

    This is how I feel about it too. Blinky lights might be ok if you’re a lone cyclist, but when it get’s busy it’s all a bit of a mess. This is probably why cars and motorcycles don’t have them!! Constant ftw

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    The new Daybright feature on Exposure lights is very good. I’ve just got a TraceR and a mate commented the other day how good it is. It’s got a built in brake light, works off an accelerometer.

    My commuter has that light and an older TraceR and I just switch mode depending on time of day. Night-time, the newer one is on a constant beam, daytime, I put it on Daybright. The older one I just leave on pulse mode all the time.

    jameso
    Full Member

    generally country lane

    Constant.

    No need for flashing mode when it’s generally dark and few other lights around. Easier to judge closing speed / bike position from a car with a constant rear light imo, partic if there’s a second constant light a foot or so away or a good stationary reflective area.

    If it was urban use I’d say constant for the main light and a higher-up flashing light as an option.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 47 total)

The topic ‘Rear light consensus – Flashing or constant?’ is closed to new replies.