Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Quick decide for me, XT or SLX Chainset !
  • tragically1969
    Free Member

    Arrrggghhhh cant decide, its doing me 'ead in !

    For my new black Soul build, XT everything else but XT or SLX chainset, heart says XT eyes say SLX look nicer……..

    alexpalacefan
    Full Member

    SLX, spend the saving on beer!

    APF

    MicArms
    Full Member

    SLX, plus the XT cranks look ****….

    Eggbox
    Free Member

    SLX I reckon

    chakaping
    Free Member

    SLX

    mafiafish
    Free Member

    SLX

    nuke
    Full Member

    Just to be a bit different…XT if going for 3-ring setup, SLX if going for double and bash.

    Surf-Mat
    Free Member

    Hmm – just had SLX and managed to kill it quite quickly. So this time I went for XT – which now also has a steel middle chainring.

    To compare the two…

    XT:

    SLX:

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    SLX, cheaper, just as good and only fractionally heavier, looks better too 😀

    amplebrew
    Full Member

    I run XT but only 'cause I got a package deal with a full groupset.

    IMHO the SLX looks a lot lot nicer, very XTR ish 8)

    When my XT wears out, I'll be replacing it with an SLX

    dave_rudabar
    Free Member

    I bought SLX, they is way betterz.

    BillyBull
    Free Member

    SLX do look better

    chainslapp
    Free Member

    SLX Here.

    guybe
    Free Member

    If everything else is XT spec, it make sense to get XT cranks to complete it.

    stevede
    Free Member

    slx cranks on ribble cycles are £60 minus bb or £8 more for double and bash version. Bargain if you ask me.
    http://www.ribblecycles.co.uk/sp/mtb-bmx-bike/Chainsets-Shimano-SLX-M660-9-Spd-Triple-Chainset-ex-BB/SHIMCHAM300

    dirtbiker100
    Free Member

    slx

    Surf-Mat
    Free Member

    Well I prefer XT and will be sticking to them now! I do have spare SLX crank arms if I ever need them though.

    I wouldn't say SLX is "better" – the only weakness of the XT (alloy middle ring) has now been addressed. Looking at the two side by side, the XT looks better finished. The weight difference is marginal but then I only paid slightly more for my 2010 XT chainset so IMO, it was worth it.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    They're functionally interchangable so SLX as it's cheaper.

    tragically1969
    Free Member

    Cheers all, i just cant help thinking that the Souls here:

    http://www.cotic.co.uk/product/soul

    Would look better with SLX on, performance wise i dont think there is a lot in it and as already mentioned SLX is £60 cheaper than XT at Ribble, its not really about the money but £60 goes a long way.

    dave_rudabar
    Free Member

    Surf-Mat – Member
    Well I prefer XT and will be sticking to them now

    Yeah but you're buff & well ghey! 😆

    Get the SLX and spend the rest on bits that make more difference.

    cheers_drive
    Full Member

    I've had SLX but XT came on my current bike. There is no functional difference so choose on price and looks (so SLX then).

    oscillatewildly
    Free Member

    xt looks alot nicer, slx looks like a cheap and tacky version of xtr, at least the xt has its own look going on 😆 xt all the way!

    MSP
    Full Member

    IMHO the SLX looks a lot lot nicer, very XTR ish

    Get slx if you think a toyota mr2 looks like a ferrari.

    .duncan
    Free Member

    SLX +1

    ratadog
    Full Member

    Had the decision to make recently, went for SLX

    MrGreedy
    Full Member

    Just in case you're having trouble visualising it, here's some SLX on my black Soul:

    To be honest I don't have a strong preference, but went for the SLX mainly on price. Can't fault it for performance or looks so far, too soon to tell about longevity though.

    Zoolander
    Free Member

    SLX FTW

    zaskar
    Free Member

    Heart says XT.

    Brain says SLX.

    naokfreek
    Free Member

    Mark Datz..where are you…???

    slx iz wikd coz itz wll az good az xt's an iz well les buck ad som fevers to mak it wurk be''er, no shit innit….i speekn 4 manwells 2.

    Represent.

    Oh and Slayer rock BTW.

    grtdkad
    Full Member

    deffo XT coz dat naokfreek sez slx innit

    MarkDatz
    Free Member

    Sum dix at skool cant take a jok and got angree all the teechars satrted piking on me and then I had to promiss not to use intarnet but now its kool again

    highclimber
    Free Member

    SLX looks a lot better and we all know that's what counts!

    cullen-bay
    Free Member

    i went for Xt 2 days ago because its lighter and IMO looks better.

    nmdbase
    Free Member

    SLX, XT are gross

    nmdbase
    Free Member

    And SLX are stiffer

    retro83
    Free Member

    xt looks alot nicer, slx looks like a cheap and tacky version of xtr, at least the xt has its own look going on xt all the way!

    true but xt looks like a nicer version of deore:

    B_Leach
    Free Member

    stevede

    slx cranks on ribble cycles are £60 minus bb or £8 more for double and bash version. Bargain if you ask me.
    http://www.ribblecycles.co.uk/sp/mtb-bmx-bike/Chainsets-Shimano-SLX-M660-9-Spd-Triple-Chainset-ex-BB/SHIMCHAM300

    oh and if you use the code "TRIP7" you get an extra 7% off on top, £55 for an SLX crankset, hell at that price i've just bought one!

    BB isn't included though, not that that bothers me, HOPE bb's all the way 😉

    H4RDT41LR1D3R
    Free Member

    I have one of each and there is only 25g difference between right crank arms with 3 rings fitted, Hope this helps.

    Bushwacked
    Free Member

    I've just bought XT but I needed a crank for tomorrow's ride. Had I had time I would have gone SLX.

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)

The topic ‘Quick decide for me, XT or SLX Chainset !’ is closed to new replies.