Doesnt sound any different to ST!
In fairness MBR is rubbish, so what were you doing subscribing? I'd rather buy a guidebook and map every two months!
MBUK I quite like, mainly because its pitched at about the right skill level for most of us. I.e. its aspirational, but atainable riding.
ST I hate, sorry lads, but the church newsletter layout, and the fact that the best photographs are the ones sent in for the gallery? I think gave up arround the time you did a feature on routes you could get to by train, one looked like a cyclepath arround Edinburgh! Come on, it must be the most out of the way place to get to for most of us unless your already local, and thats the best? The learnign to wheelie feature was a bit pants too, a)why wheelie when manualings more suefull? b)it never actualy told you how to wheelie, just about your day out trying! There was a mega peaks route years ago, with a teo page spread of a picture of a rider on a track taken form the other side of the valey, at least i think it was a rider, the image was so out of focus and grainy my mum takes better pic on her cameraphone! And breathe………..
The only article ive ever re-read was "its all about plan C", that was actualy quite good.
Dirt I like, good photography, interesting layouts (ok, so its easy to complain about them, but at least you dont expect them to end with the minutes of the parish council meeting), interesting articles (I quite like reading other peoples waffel, even if it has no real point), aspirational (I'll never set a sub minute 1:04), atainable (theres always someone on a bet up hardtail), and ammeturish enough to be good fun (they do have atendancy not to follow stuff up though, like bike build reviews etc). If ST was more like Dirt for XC riders, id buy it again, but its not, so I wont.