Bought current edition to read on a journey. Last couple I saw haven't been too bad.
Buit of a return to usual (poor) form now though, with three or four "First ride" (that bit is important) reports on interesting bikes - which they appear to have ridden at a trade show.
Each of these is a full page at least, with pics of them riding the bikes in question. But while the copy is full of information about frame angles and tube shapes, there is literally only half a sentence (or nothing) about how they actually ride.
Why do they do this? Did you actually ride the bikes or just sit on them for photos Paul Burwell? Why don't you rename the feature "first techobabble"? Don't you have an editor to tell you to say what the bikes are actually like to ride?
OK, I should have known what I was letting myself in for, but my goat is well and truly got anyway.
