Soops – as LabWormy stated both his/hers and my algebraic solution are correct – they will both give the same answer.
I can see it is a little confusing as one solution is taking the SQRT of 2/3 of something and another the SQRT of 3/2 of something.
My previous post attempted to explain the difference in the approaches by graphical illustration. If the rectangle has sides of length a and b respectively, where b is greater than a.
Then my approach is equivalent to shrinking the rectangle to a square with sides of length a. This would require a reduction in area by two thirds (2/3) in the OPs example. Whereas LabWormy approach is equivalent to extending the rectangle to create a square with sides of length b. This would require an increase in area of one and a half (3/2).
As LabWormy stated several posts ago. I solved for the shorter side a; whereas he/she solved for the longer side b.
You say "tomato I say tomato"