Sign up to Singletrack Premier

Singletrack Mountain Bike Magazine

  • Home
  • News
  • MagArchive
  • Forums
  • Reviews
  • Trail Guide
  • Blogs
  • Shop
  • Subscribe
  • Advanced Search
  • Overview
  • Bike Forum
  • Chat Forum
  • For Sale
  • Wanted
  • Forum Help
  • Classified Rules

Chat Forum

[closed]

It's global cooling, not warming!

  • 1330 posts & 87 voices | Started 2 years ago by Spongebob | Latest reply from molgrips

Tags:

  • arrogance
  • burn the unbelievers
  • Church of Climatology
  • denial of facts
  • Edukator_Troll
  • Fanatics
  • Flat earthers
  • getting boring
  • hainey pwnd
  • HOT AIR
  • Interminable!
  • it's not science
  • it's politics
  • Left Wing Terrorists
  • Permanently Bewildered
  • Pirates
  • Self-appointed Sages
  • Straw Man
  • The Secret Scientist
  • This Is Interesting
  • thought police
  • very taxing
  • Zulu is unbelieveable
Pages: « Previous123…38Next »
  1. ernie_lynch - Member

    The simple fact is that no one really knows or can prove either way. The sad fact is that all governments around the world are using it as an excuse to extract more money from us. If they were going to do anything useful then they would tax Beef a lot more, farming for beef is a far bigger contributor than everything else put together.

    So what you are saying is that all the governments around the world actually know that climate change isn't happening ? !

    The proof is in the fact that governments around the world won't tax beef, which is the number one contributor of climate change [which isn't happening] ?

    This is terrible ........... I simply had no idea that this conspiracy was so widespread and all embracing.

    Surely, there must be something we can do to fight back against this global conspiracy ?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. GaryLake - Member

    I thought they said we [the UK] were in for warmer, wetter winters?

    It's just another theory as to what could happen.

    I love how we have to wait and see for sure before doing something about it. Was sent a cartoon strip the other day: A man despairs at hearing that climate change was a hoax and states "oh no, and we built a better world for nothing!"

    Summed it up for me really.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. Spongebob - Member

    I remain unconvinced that our CO2 production has, or is having a significant effect on global warm,,, sorry, climate change. I do not dispute that the planet is warming, but with reference to winter times, there have been many more milder winters in the past. Back then, people spoke about the planet warming up. Now that it's bloody freezing, they are saying this is due to a sine wave and it's still global warming. Talk about destroying your own credibility! Utter tosh! I agree, a 3 year timescale is an irrelevance, infact 100 years is irrelevant if you want to be scientific about the matter. I was listening to teachers in the 1970's telling us about the problem. If we'd believed the reports about Amazonian deforestation, there would be no rain forest by now. This isn't a new problem, so why has it taken 40 years for governments to act on climate change?

    Our ability to detect weather/climate has become far better in just the past decade or so, with the emergence of new technologies and the ease at which information is distributed to us. I also think the way news can travel so far and so quickly has had an impact on how we perceive the world. We now get in an instant, in full graphic detail, information about what the weather is doing to people all over the world.

    I reckon so called extreme weather has actually been occurring for a very long time, but seeing as we have improved the ability to see more in recent years, it feels like the problem is getting worse. We can also be certain that the increase is due to the subject being on the political agenda! As any mathemetician will tell you, if you lookat a big enough sample, there will always be identifiable patterns. There is no doubt that there is political agenda and I cannot trust any internet article whose url ends with "dot gov"!! Scientists are not agreed on whether it's man who is causing the problem, only the ones receiving government grants do.

    Climate change is cyclical and global warming has happend thousands of years before we had the capability to burn and waste so much precious fossil fuel. I DO NOT advocate pointless waste, I believe in conserving as much energy as possible. It's not difficult to get your consumption down if you put vanity to one side, and act smart in your home, with your movements and when you shop. Having no job and no money makes the task a great deal easier as reducing all consumption and travel comes with the territory (if you are smart enough to live by your means).

    Listening to scientific programmes, one detects plenty of evidence that we are in a cycle over which we have very little control. Throughout my life I have heard how only 300 years ago, the climate was much warmer in Britain, some 100-150 years before the industrial revolution. One programme I listened to talked about how, thousands of years ago due to a warmer climate, sea levels were 6-7m higher than they are now. 6-7m???

    My advice, continue to conserve energy, but don't buy into this climate change political meddling, it's just another source of stealth taxation!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. mudshark - Member

    that shouldn't excuse abusing the world we live (points at China)

    Why them? The US are the worst polluters by far right? In terms of per capita China have nothing to be ashamed of.

    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/env_pol_car_dio_per_cap-pollution-carbon-dioxide-per-capita

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. Spongebob - Member

    What we should be worrying about is the continuing EXPLOSION in the world's population!!

    To my knowledge, the only contry that has done anything about the problem is China. The Chinese government's "one child per couple" policy remains to this day. I know China have many human rights issues, but this is one that is for the good for the country and for the planet. Here in the developed world, the cost of living has kept population increase reasonably at bay.

    Conversely, you have Bill Gates and Warren Buffett spending a huge sum of money attempting to erradicate Malaria in developing countries. I wholeheartedly understand the innate human desire to preserve life, however in this programme to really help these poor people, there should be a simultaneous education programme to get these people to change their cultural habit of having as many children as they possibly can!

    We are definitely going to run out of food and fresh water before climate change wipes us out.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. AdamW - Member

    Spongebob:

    You seem to think that governments want us to believe that climate change is believing to they can tax us?

    Get a grip - when has any government worried about taxing us? After the financial meltdown we're in they will tax anything and everything without having to put up some form of screen of 'ooh, green taxes'!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. Scienceofficer - Member

    The simple fact that CO2 captures and re-radiates energy is proven and indisputable.

    More energy is a system creates more turbulence and greater un-predictability, which in turn is harder to model.

    It only takes a bit of cold weather to show how many people can't differentiate weather and climate.

    As has already been discussed here, the Earth's climate has always fluctuated between warmer and colder periods. The issue is one of magnitude and speed, and how much the extra energy in the system, put there by anthropogenic sources, will push the natural cycle to one extreme or the other.

    Monte-carlo simulations on some of the worlds most powerful super computers appear to suggest that we're facing a period of unprecedented and RAPID warming.

    The RAPID bit is the important part, since its predicted to be so rapid that adaptation by the worlds habitats and species may be difficult or impossible - end result - extinctions and a massive impact to our traditional food production practices within decades rather than centuries.

    The speed of the change will change weather patterns and affect water supplies so fast that we will see mass starvation, Climate refugee migration on a mass scale and food supply problems.

    Its not going to be a problem for 'life' but it will be a problem for life and civilisation as we know it. If it goes the way the models suggest, the world in 100 years will be a rather different place from the one we know know, but isn't that always the case?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. bonj - Member

    Yeah because some people on a car forum obviously know more than the majority of the world's climate scientists.

    I wish people would just be honest enough to say that they don't really give a shit about climate change and whether man is having an impact on it, rather than claiming they know something about it.

    I think with most people it's not that they don't give a shit about it, but just that they don't see how any decisions they make are going to affect it, or how it's going to affect them, their children, or their children's children.
    As such they're quite willing to do things like get energy efficient lightbulbs instead of normals when it's convenient to do so, but don't rightly see how putting themselves out by a considerable degree in the name of climate change is anything but a completely thankless exercise.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. anagallis_arvensis - Member

    **** me some people who can seemingly manage to write in a coherant manner are actually completete retards with astounding levels of arrogance in thinking they understand more about something than people who have dedicated their lives to studying it.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  10. Spongebob - Member

    Get a grip - when has any government worried about taxing us?

    When a general election is looming??

    Posted 2 years ago #
  11. Scienceofficer - Member

    We'll all feel rightly put out when the cost of wheat triples and the cost of feeding ourselves consumes all our disposable incomes.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  12. grumm - Member

    I think with most people it's not that they don't give a shit about it, but just that they don't see how any decisions they make are going to affect it, or how it's going to affect them, their children, or their children's children.

    Yeah fair enough but why does no-one ever say that either? Instead they come up with the same rehashed and discredited arguments about ice ages and global conspiracies.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  13. Spongebob - Member

    Get a grip - when has any government worried about taxing us?

    Stealth tax = a tax they hope we won't notice, or one that we can see, but don't think will affect us much.

    It's a form of deception IMHO and if they weren't worried about taxing us, stealth taxation would not exist.

    I have a grip thank you very much AdamW!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  14. 5thElefant - Member

    **** me some people who can seemingly manage to write in a coherant manner are actually completete retards with astounding levels of arrogance in thinking they understand more about something than people who have dedicated their lives to studying it.

    Work in any industry for a few years and you'll realise the industry experts are all bluffers and fucktards. The climate industry won't be any different.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  15. Spongebob - Member

    anagallis_arvensis - Member

    **** me some people who can seemingly manage to write in a coherant manner are actually completete retards with astounding levels of arrogance in thinking they understand more about something than people who have dedicated their lives to studying it.

    Are you referring to yourself anagalliss_arvensis?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  16. El-bent - Member

    **** me some people who can seemingly manage to write in a coherant manner are actually completete retards with astounding levels of arrogance in thinking they understand more about something than people who have dedicated their lives to studying it.

    They only hear want to the stuff that doesn't affect their selfish little lives I'm afraid.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  17. GrahamS - Member

    > Get a grip - when has any government worried about taxing us?

    When a general election is looming??

    So in your considered opinion the vast majoirty of the world's climate scientists and the world governments have agreed to this global deception because the UK is going to have an election soon and folk might not like taxes much???

    It's a form of deception IMHO and if they weren't worried about taxing us, stealth taxation would not exist.

    It doesn't does it? What taxes am I paying that I know nothing about?
    Calling a tax that everyone knows about a "stealth tax" seems a bit odd to me.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  18. ernie_lynch - Member

    Spongebob - Member

    "Get a grip - when has any government worried about taxing us?"

    When a general election is looming??

    How true. But what I don't understand, is why China is going along with this climate change nonsense. Because obviously they don't need to "worry about a general election looming".

    Any clues Spongebob ?

    China vows climate change action

    Posted 2 years ago #
  19. PJM1974 - Member

    If politicians take Climate Change so seriously, why is only 5% of green tax revenues then reinvested in renewable energy projects?

    Why is the cost of public transport continuing to increase?

    Why are governments unwilling to legislate against high CO2 emitting cars and air travel beyond simply adding more Green Taxes?

    Why does Stanstead need another runway?

    Why isn't the Severn Estuary being tapped for tidal energy?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  20. 5thElefant - Member

    How true. But what I don't understand, is why China is going along with this climate change nonsense. Because obviously they don't need to "worry about a general election looming".

    International politics. Just another part of the game.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  21. uplink - Member

    I don't really follow this sort of stuff too closely but at the Copenhagen conference there was a commitment [or talk] of restricting global temp rise to less than 2C over n years
    How exactly can that be managed?

    What I mean is, is it as easy as saying "we're warming up a bit fast, we'll ease back for a while"
    Can we really see an effect of our actions that quickly?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  22. Spongebob - Member

    Yes Ernie! China are going along with it because of international pressure (the countries that buy their goods are leaning on them), but it's only political rhetoric. I can't imagine they will really make significant changes.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  23. grumm - Member

    PJM1974 - yes governments are no doubt using MMCC cynically, but that doesn't mean it's not happening.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  24. El-bent - Member

    Why is the cost of public transport continuing to increase?

    Privatised, have to make profit?

    Why are governments unwilling to legislate against high CO2 emitting cars and air travel beyond simply adding more Green Taxes?

    Because voters drive cars like that, and use air travel?

    Why does Stanstead need another runway?

    Because we want to travel by air a lot more and any climate issue goes out the window when business is involved(see Copenhagen for details)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  25. ernie_lynch - Member

    China are going along with it because of international pressure.

    Rightio ........ they are just doing what they being told to do. It's good to know that they are so sensitive to outside pressure - I had no idea.

    And presumably so keen to help Western governments get re-elected.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  26. Spongebob - Member

    Graham S

    So in your considered opinion the vast majoirty of the world's climate scientists and the world governments have agreed to this global deception because the UK is going to have an election soon and folk might not like taxes much???

    I didn't even suggest that! You are twisting what I wrote.

    Now Ernie, give me an actual figure for this "vast" majority of scientists. Do you have a figure for all the scientists who don't subscribe to this and who are scared they would loose their research budgets?

    You must also bear in mind that politicians all round the globe are like ours. For one they aren't scientists! Many of them have no expertise, but rely on paid, so called "experts". Politicans mostly lie and cheat their way to power and then continue this once in office. Their arrogance knows no bounds and the longer they are there, the worse they get! In my life I have seen plenty of evidence to support this. They are self serving egotists who are arrogant enough to think we should bother to listen to them. They will act on the advice they receive, but frequently come up with solutions to problems that clearly demonstrates that they haven't understood the problem! In most cases however, they seem clever enough to raise money from their schemes. OH what a cynic I am!!!

    Posted 2 years ago #
  27. colande - Member

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8299079.stm

    For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

    a decade isn't really a good timescale to measure things,
    but the doom and gloom hasn't materialised like many said
    interesting though, it does seem that none of the scientists can agree on what is happening out there

    Posted 2 years ago #
  28. Spongebob - Member

    If politicians REALLY wanted to get us to significantly reduce our CO2 emissions, they would ban wasteful activities, not just tax them more!

    They won't do this in a hurry because it affects economies and in turn, tax receipts.

    Like killing the golden goose.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  29. ernie_lynch - Member

    Now Ernie, give me an actual figure for this "vast" majority of scientists. Do you have a figure for all the scientists who don't subscribe to this and who are scared they would loose their research budgets?

    It wasn't me what said it.

    I'm well aware that the crafty buggers don't want to lose their research budgets.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  30. finbar - Member

    That means that whilst we're still on our way out of the last ice age (so it's going to get warmer) we may be on a shorter term downward curve.

    Some rentaprof on the news made this mistake the other week as well. Throughout the mid/late Quaternary interglacial periods have lasted ~10 thousand years, separated by much longer glacials of about 100ka. The current interglacial started ~12ka ago, so that would suggest the Earth should start getting colder any time now.

    It appears that anthropogenically-induced climate changes are causing deviation from this pattern though.

    (sorry to buck the trend and cite actual evidence by the way)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  31. mudshark - Member

    If politicians REALLY wanted to get us to significantly reduce our CO2 emissions, they would ban wasteful activities, not just tax them more!

    But banning isn't compatible with our free world....

    Posted 2 years ago #
  32. El-bent - Member

    You must also bear in mind that politicians all round the globe are like ours. For one they aren't scientists! Many of them have no expertise, but rely on paid so called "experts". Politicans mostly lie and cheat their way to power and then continue this. Their arrogance knows no bounds! In my life I have seen plenty of evidence to support this. They are self serving egotists who are arrogant enough to think we should bother to listen to them. They will act on the advice they receive, but frequently come up with solutions to problems, that clearly demonstrate that they haven't understood the problem. In most cases however, they are clever enough to raise money from their schemes. OH what a cynic I am!!!

    You now seem to have moved on from attacking the science of climate change to attacking politicians. So is this little rant of yours about climate change or paying taxes?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  33. uplink - Member

    I don't really follow this sort of stuff too closely but at the Copenhagen conference there was a commitment [or talk] of restricting global temp rise to less than 2C over n years
    How exactly can that be managed?

    What I mean is, is it as easy as saying "we're warming up a bit fast, we'll ease back for a while"
    Can we really see an effect of our actions that quickly?

    anyone?
    Genuinely interested BTW

    Posted 2 years ago #
  34. GrahamS - Member

    I didn't even suggest that! You are twisting what I wrote.

    Are you new here?

    I didn't twist it that much: you said it was an excuse for unstealthy stealth taxes and when asked why the government needed an excuse you suggested general elections.

    The point stands: calling widely publicised taxes that everyone can see, "stealth taxes" is just an emotive attack. Suggesting that governments don't have the power to raise taxes without climate change is also a bit weak.

    If politicians REALLY wanted to get us to significantly reduce our CO2 emissions, they would ban wasteful activities, not just tax them more!

    Banning is hugely ineffective (ever heard of prohibition?). Doing something drastic like banning all car travel for one day a week would make huge impact, but would also cause huge public revolt.

    Taxation is about the psychology of nudges.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  35. finbar - Member

    Nice explanation of current winter conditions & its significance re climate change here:

    http://metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2010/pr20100106b.html

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Pages: « Previous123…38Next »

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Don't miss…

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Blogs
  • It's the weekend
  • SRAM XX1
  • Fresh Goods Friday 168
  • Shimano Singletrack Classic Weekender Rider Profile: Singular Sam
  • Stolen: Continental Team Orange Alpine 160
  • Midweek Mini Movies 100!
  • Maxxis High Roller 2
  • Nukeproof/DT Swiss 29in custom wheel build
  • Cannondale Jekyll 3
  • Bionicon C-Guide V2
  • Review: Charge Bikes Sponge Grips
  • Review: Whyte 146 S
  • Diary of a Megavalanche Virgin Part 3: Win some, lose some...
  • County Contrast
  • Diary of a Megavalanche Virgin Part 2: Skills Time
  • Green's Gravity Enduro: An introduction
  • Diary of a Megavalanche Virgin Part 1: A hill in Wales
  • New Year - New Bike!

Advertisement

Advertisement

road.cc cycling website

Advertisement

Singletrack Magazine
  • Log In

Skip to top


Forgotten your password?

Not got an account?

Register now!

  • Singletrack

  • Magazine Stockists
  • Publication Dates
  • Premier Club
  • Contact Us
  • it’s not easy being green
  • Website & Forums

  • Forum Overview
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Classified Rules
  • Forum Help
  • Website Help
  • Exits

  • road.cc
  • ST on Twitter
  • ST on Facebook
  • ST on Vimeo
  • News Feeds
Issue 73