So, just after some opinion here...
My brother went away for the weekend, and asked our niece and her boyfriend to come house sit to look after the cat. They kindly agreed as they live at home with their parents and wanted some space.
Now, without sounding prejudice - the boyfriend is a lazy sod, hasn't held down a job for longer than a week, spends all day smoking 'da weed and playing PS3. We've lent him money before to pay off police fines when he gets pulled for possession etc. And we only do that so the niece doesn't have to find the money out of her small salary she earns from working all hours at a local petrol station.
So - they stay over the weekend, and apparently boyfriend has one of his mates over (he hangs out with some dodgy chavs). Although initially denying they had anyone over, a neighbour told my brother he'd seen a couple of 'shifty' lads around the house.
When my brother gets home at 1.30pm he finds the backdoor wide open, with the keys in the OUTSIDE, and the only thing taken from the house was £60 he kept in his cupboard in his bedroom - despite leaving his laptop, iPod and PS3 around the house (none of these were touched). According to my brother only he knew that money was there - and you'd have to be fairly specific to come in the house and go straight to the bedroom to find it. Again, nothing else was touched - no drawers pulled out etc.
So, my niece and her bf say they left the house at 12.30pm - and it must have been an opportunist who let himself in and took the money, which leaves a few questions - how did the opportunist get the keys? how did he know where the money was? why did he take nothing else?
My brother and I both suspect the bf - he would of had ample opportunity to go through my brothers stuff, discover the money and potentially give the keys to his mate to come in after they left to go grab it.
Is it me, or does this all sound too shifty to be an 'opportunist'?

