In response to the comments about my Maverick, well beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and to me she ain't no fat lass… 😉
Seriously though, if you've never seen one up close, you won't appreciate all the tiny little design details that really contribute to it's appeal, some improving the way it rides, some just for aesthetics. They are very much a "form follows function" design, but that said, a lot of effort has gone into refining the design of the frame to attempt to make it look a bit more organic. You'll not find a sharp angle or an untidy weld anywhere…
I do understand that they are like marmite, you either love them or hate them, but by the same token, who says that a bike frame should look a particular way, and that the bulges are in the "wrong" places on a Maverick? I'd argue strongly that ANY Marin or Whyte full sus bike is distinctly uglier than any Maverick.
Fair play to the guy with the Kirk Precision though, not only was it made of magnesium, but it was an E-stay design, but also it was bright pink! Nice one…